Posted on 03/12/2010 2:31:12 PM PST by HD1200
What are Democratic leaders saying? If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. Thats one of the arguments Ive been hearing, Stupak says. Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life were talking about. If Obamacare passes, Stupak says, it could signal the end of any meaningful role for pro-life Democrats within their own party. It would be very, very hard for someone who is a right-to-life Democrat to run for office, he says.
(Excerpt) Read more at corner.nationalreview.com ...
We hear it frequently outside the abortion clinic. “We just can’t afford this baby.” May God have mercy on us all.
Satan has always promoted the sacrifice of children.
How Brave New World . . . How utilitarian . . . How repulsive.
The left just disgusts me.
How much more evil can these bastards be?
B T T T
That isn’t the whole of it. These ghouls also intend to not give medical care to whomever they deem undesirable and too old and too expensive to keep alive. Yes, that could be YOU!
“Also theres the fact that illegals have a lot more children than Americans.”
The more children, the more food stamps, the more welfare payments, the more free health care. They don’t have as many children in their native countries. Wonder why that is??
DEPOPULATION, CODEX ALIMNETARIUS, EUGENICS.....thier hope.
Didn’t the Obamination say something that children were a disease or something like that during the campaign???
I'm interested in seeing any links or documentation you may have on that.
I'm not quite sure that that's true. Depending on how the statistics are analyzed, it could be misinterpreted for various reasons, e.g. immigrants tend to be in a rather narrow age-range (heavily weighted toward healthy people in their early reproductive years, very few chronically ill and oldsters in the holds of Caribbean boats or making their way across the Sonoran desert) and that might skew the apparent fertility stats upwards.
Last December, I think it was, the first amendment offered to the Reid Senate bill was sponsored by pro-abortion Sen. Barbara Mikulski, a Maryland Democrat, dealing with federally mandated coverage of "preventive care."
The amendment essentially defines abortion as preventative care and results in mandates to private insurance plans that they define abortion as such and provide coverage of it.
Funny, I don’t recall those of the jackass party ever balking at spending a few extra bucks before.
More children will be born, and therefore it will provide us with millions more taxpayers,
I’v always been pro-baby.
me too
I was being cheeky...
I am life long pro-life...
Thank you for all you do...
:)
This is pure evil from the very same people that don’t believe it exists.
To me a baby isn’t a ‘mistake’ - the wrong answer in math is a mistake ... Obama is an idiot. They always yak about ‘choice’ - what choice does the baby have?
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.