Posted on 03/11/2010 5:42:36 PM PST by C19fan
Weve done a million posts about this three-way match-up but I dont think weve done one yet about a key swing state. Not what I would have predicted. Floridas the first really important stop on the GOP calendar that weve looked at, and Romneys lead there is overwhelming. He gets 52% to 21% for Huckabee and 18% for Palin. Its closer, but still a double digit advantage, in Colorado. There Romney gets 44% to 25% for Palin and 17% for Huckabee.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Actually I think it’s just generating more interest in her—especially among the undecideds who want to give her a second look. Everytime a rumor spreads, Palin gains a couple of thousand followers on Facebook/Twitter. :)
Another stupid, meaningless push poll.
This is very useful knowledge.
Thanks!
this poll is crap— do yall remember the votes that she got in 08? i can promise you, that it wasnt for john mccain- it was for sarah- with all the unemployment, house forclosures,ect going on with this goober-in-chief, sarah could win easy
Totally agree. If Romney is running against Barry, and someone forces me to the polls at gunpoint, I’d vote for Barry rather than Romney. Or any other RINO, for that matter, but especially Romney.
If I’m going to be stabbed in the back, let it be by a ‘Rat, rather than someone who claims to be a Republican.
No RINOs, no Romney!
i agree 100%— NO MORE ROMNEYS
However I know for a fact that Romney wouldn't stand a chance in ‘12. In order to win in ‘12 we HAVE to have a candidate that was, is, and always has been against government involvement in healthcare.
Romneycare completely disqualifies Romney in my opinion. And nominating someone like him would practically guarantee a zero victory.
Amen brother
An Allahpundit article with a Push Poll.
Typical of this person.
He can have Mitt at 99% and I would laugh even more.
Yeppers! Presidential Material from the head down!
“Put down the LSM Kool-Aid and pick up a copy of “Going Rogue”. You’ll see things a lot more clearly, if you do those two things.”
I agree with you to the extent that we’re appearing to see her in such a fabulous light when we consider the dope that’s in the White House now. I’d just like to have her get more foreign policy experience. But, compared to the jackass in residence, yeah, she’d be super.
That is PDS in Team Romney.
And this on the same day that the known Palin-basher John Ziegler had the audacity to say Palin should run in 2012 because she’d lose.
I see you are back to lying again. Since I know you've been beaten over the head with the facts to no avail, I simply will tell people to go look at the RCP history of polls for the election, to see how false this statement is.
In the ENTIRE ELECTION CYCLE, there was only ONE single Poll that had McCain/Palin up by more than 5 points, a USA Today/Gallup poll RIGHT AFTER THE CONVENTION, a full 58 days before the election, that showed a 10 point lead.
NO RCP-listed poll EVER showed a lead of 8 points, and other than the ONE SINGLE Gallop poll, NO poll showed them up by more than 5 points. And there was only ONE poll that ever showed them up by 5 points, and that was also days after the convention, and again 2 months before the election.
Only 9 polls after McCain chose Palin ever had a lead, and the last lead they had was an outlier on the 25th of september, DOZENS of days before the election.
Only an idiot, or a person with reckless disregard for the truth, would say something so patently false and easily debunked as "McCain/Palin was up 8-10points in some polls days prior to the election".
Of course, your contention that Romney attacked Palin or her kids is also entirely baseless, but your bizarre beliefs about polling is just so much easier to debunk.
But it's important to occasionally remind our fellow freepers how devoid of sense your postings are. For the few that haven't figured it out yet.
I've also listened to Palin's entire discussion of the election, and not once does she support your specious theory. I trust her much more than I would ever believe what you are peddling.
She also explains who on "our side" was attacking her, and why -- you should read her book, you might not come across as such an ignorant peddler of misstatements.
Now, Team Romney attacked Gov. Palin DURING ELECTION 2008.
Now why don't you try to NOT change the subject again.
"Frum ... a critic of Palin (called) her nomination a "huge mistake" October 13 (2008)"
"the Palin Leaker from the McCain Campaign?
... was Nicolle Wallace's husband."
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
*Slick Willard MEGA-Barf Alert*
Exactly what the rest of us are doing in defeating the Socialist con-artist Slick Willard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.