Posted on 03/11/2010 11:23:00 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan
We really, really wanted to take a break from writing about Orly Taitz today. It appears she's trying to get our attention, though. And maybe the police's as well.
The screen-shot posted above is one left on a recent blog post of hers. The judge mentioned is Royce C. Lamberth, who is assigned to her Taitz v. Obama lawsuit in Washington D.C. Taitz didn't write the comment, but her blog is moderated: No comments can be made public unless Taitz okay's them.
It's not like Taitz allows every comment to be made public. There are plenty of Taitz-critical comments left that never see the light of day. So Taitz or someone who works for her made the decision to publish a reader's comment about threatening a judge's grandchildren with murder. This should play well in Taitz's run for office.
Elsewhere on OrlyTaitzEsq.com--which we recommend you don't visit unless you've got some heavy-duty malware blocking software--we have the Laguna Niguel dentist lashing out against local media. Specifically, the local media that you are reading right now:
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.ocweekly.com ...
where is the comment on her website?"
- - - - - - - -
I see no one has answered you.
It appears to have been removed. But I do see the moonbat and crazy Taitz haters are out in force.
That's because he is one.
does Mark Levin ever talk about the b.c. on his show?
But then again, we have posters like you bucky boy lending them a helping hand.
Sums up the one eyed "Texan" perfectly.
“We really, really wanted to take a break from writing about Orly Taitz today.”
ROFLLMAO!!! Suuure you did. hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I think you are just trying to give orly hits on her website. Put that in your crackpipe and toke it!
You think Bucky boy would do that? Nah, not him, the one that voted for Hillary but says he only did it because Rush told him to do it. SUREEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
He accuses Orly of working for the other side...me thinks he projects too much.
Are the posts being moderated by Orly?
Another thing we know is that Orly’s sites have always been targeted by people who mess with her controls and put viruses on.
If this was within Orly’s control then it is totally inappropriate and I hope she will correct it. There is no call for something like this.
Have you ever heard of psy-ops?
Everybody thought the witness in the Vincent Foster case was crazy too - the guy who took a leak at the park and saw that Vince Foster’s car was not there until AFTER he was supposedly dead. He caught the secret service guy who was actually doing the psy-ops on him but that never made it into the news. His testimony was ordered into the final issue of Starr’s report but Starr put it in an appendix and never gave the press the appendix. Funny how that happens, huh?
But there are facts that are more verifiable than Leo’s account, and you can look at those facts to get a better idea of the situation. It’s actually a pretty stark picture, when taken all together. See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
The follow up post.
Submitted on 2010/03/11 at 3:15pm
Dr. Taitz, I beg you to accept my abject apologies for troubling your house. Please post the following clarification to Mr. Kornhaber’s blog at OCWeekly, which rejects my server.
_____________________________________________
MinutemanCDC_SC writes:
Dear O.C. readers, and Patriots, Christians, Conservatives, Constitutionalists, Countrymen,
I wrote the post which offends some of you, in the context of an abrupt flip-flop by a Patriot, a Conservative, a Marine: U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, for the Central District of California.
I deduce, by observations of out-of-character conduct, that judges are being threatened, even honorable ones, even conservative ones, and even ex-Marines.
Judge Carter, an ex-Marine, originally stated on the record that the court had jurisdiction to hear Dr. Taitz’s case Barnett et al v Obama. He apparently was threatened when Mr. Obama placed Siddarth Velamoor, one of the attorneys from his defense law firm, Perkins Coie, as a law clerk for the judge.
Judge Carter looked very scared, very intimidated by something at the last hearing on October 5th. Thereafter, he decided that the plaintiffs no longer have standing, and his court no longer has jurisdiction.
Far from inciting to violence, my post opposed violence, intimidation, coercion, and obstruction of justice.
My post was not calling for a criminal act by Patriots, Constitutionalists, or Marines, but decrying actions which have already caused dismissals, without any hearings on the merits, of over 100 legitimate lawsuits demanding public verification of Mr. Obama’s eligibility for office, using the original documents, only one of which is the vault hard copy of his supposed Certificate of Live Birth.
My post did not encourage coercing any judge. It merely painted the most plausible scenario of what had obviously already happened, in light of the result. The poster who quoted me here erred by ignoring the cardinal rule of interpretation: CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT. He also confused “reporting” (past) with “inciting” (future). Since you did not include a link to the original post, we are not able to see how out of context the snippet was taken.
Yes, but it is the whole message, not an out of context snippet.
It doesn't seem to be there now. Do you have a link to it? It's really too bad, we could see the whole thing, not the snippet.
Well, someone, did post around a hundred posts into the thread.
It was poorly written and taken out of context.
I'm on a computer and a network with every anti-virus, anti malware, anti "bad content", tool known to mankind. It had no problems with the site, just now.
The worst I've ever gotten, and that was some time ago, is an alert saying the *site* was known to have issues, not that there was an issue. I ignored the warning/alert, and again, no problem was actually found.
The trolls are uninterested in the poster’s clarified words...they’re too busy smearing.
MinutemanCDC_SC's post was on the 9th this "clarification" was posted on the 11th. The post of the 9th was the post at Orly's site in its entirety. I remember being floored by it.The post of the 11th is "reflection" or "ass covering".
It doesn’t seem to be there now.
I’m not a computer guru by any imagination. But I thought once something got in cyberspace via the net it was there in some form, cached version, etc. I couldn’t begin to tell you how to find it if it is infact out there.
Also check post #115..........
See post 191 on this thread where the poster clarifies his words.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2468926/posts?page=191#191
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.