The follow up post.
Submitted on 2010/03/11 at 3:15pm
Dr. Taitz, I beg you to accept my abject apologies for troubling your house. Please post the following clarification to Mr. Kornhaber’s blog at OCWeekly, which rejects my server.
_____________________________________________
MinutemanCDC_SC writes:
Dear O.C. readers, and Patriots, Christians, Conservatives, Constitutionalists, Countrymen,
I wrote the post which offends some of you, in the context of an abrupt flip-flop by a Patriot, a Conservative, a Marine: U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, for the Central District of California.
I deduce, by observations of out-of-character conduct, that judges are being threatened, even honorable ones, even conservative ones, and even ex-Marines.
Judge Carter, an ex-Marine, originally stated on the record that the court had jurisdiction to hear Dr. Taitz’s case Barnett et al v Obama. He apparently was threatened when Mr. Obama placed Siddarth Velamoor, one of the attorneys from his defense law firm, Perkins Coie, as a law clerk for the judge.
Judge Carter looked very scared, very intimidated by something at the last hearing on October 5th. Thereafter, he decided that the plaintiffs no longer have standing, and his court no longer has jurisdiction.
Far from inciting to violence, my post opposed violence, intimidation, coercion, and obstruction of justice.
My post was not calling for a criminal act by Patriots, Constitutionalists, or Marines, but decrying actions which have already caused dismissals, without any hearings on the merits, of over 100 legitimate lawsuits demanding public verification of Mr. Obama’s eligibility for office, using the original documents, only one of which is the vault hard copy of his supposed Certificate of Live Birth.
My post did not encourage coercing any judge. It merely painted the most plausible scenario of what had obviously already happened, in light of the result. The poster who quoted me here erred by ignoring the cardinal rule of interpretation: CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT. He also confused “reporting” (past) with “inciting” (future). Since you did not include a link to the original post, we are not able to see how out of context the snippet was taken.
MinutemanCDC_SC's post was on the 9th this "clarification" was posted on the 11th. The post of the 9th was the post at Orly's site in its entirety. I remember being floored by it.The post of the 11th is "reflection" or "ass covering".