Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA: Space Shuttles Could Fly Longer With Extra Funds...
Space.com ^ | 03/10/2010 | Tariq Malik

Posted on 03/11/2010 1:08:22 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

The chief of NASA's space shuttle program said Tuesday that the agency could technically continue to fly its three aging orbiters beyond their planned 2010 retirement if ordered to do so by President Barack Obama and lawmakers. All it would take would be the extra funding needed to pay for it.

Space shuttle program manager John Shannon said NASA spends about $200 million a month on its space shuttle program. That's about $2.4 billion a year that would be required to keep the shuttle flying beyond their 2010 retirement date, he said.

"I think the real issue that the agency and the nation has to address is the expense," Shannon told reporters in a mission briefing.

NASA currently plans to retire the space shuttle fleet in the fall after flying the last of four final shuttle missions remaining for this year. The next shuttle to fly is Discovery, which is poised to blast off on April 5 to deliver vital supplies and spare parts to the International Space Station.

The fleet's retirement would end more than 29 years of U.S. space shuttle flights and leave NASA without a dedicated American spacecraft for launching astronauts into orbit.

Some U.S. senators and members of Congress have expressed support for extending the shuttle program, with Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) filing a bill last week formally seeking a reprieve for NASA's space shuttle fleet.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: aerospace; nasa; shuttle; shuttleprogram; spaceexploration; spaceshuttle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 03/11/2010 1:08:23 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Bump.


2 posted on 03/11/2010 1:11:04 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

/


3 posted on 03/11/2010 1:16:18 AM PST by happinesswithoutpeace (Midnight! the outpost of advancing day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

21st century NASA produces nothing


4 posted on 03/11/2010 1:19:29 AM PST by element92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Hey!
There are young pregnant girls who need someone to pay their veterinary/breeder fees. Not to mention banks and ratings agencies that need bailouts.

We can’t afford science!


5 posted on 03/11/2010 1:20:28 AM PST by djf (Who says "The stuff of life" is not stuff? Mostly it's people who have the most stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: element92

Bullshit. Those Rovers have been the most spectacular accomplishment since the moon landings.
And I would argue that Hubble is way, way up there as well.

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1996/01/


6 posted on 03/11/2010 1:23:33 AM PST by djf (Who says "The stuff of life" is not stuff? Mostly it's people who have the most stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: djf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mars_Project


7 posted on 03/11/2010 1:34:28 AM PST by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

Even if they did keep the shuttle flying just what is it going to do? After the Hubble repair missions its been pretty much just ISS re-supply trips.


8 posted on 03/11/2010 1:34:38 AM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1
Even if they did keep the shuttle flying just what is it going to do? After the Hubble repair missions its been pretty much just ISS re-supply trips.

I think you just answered your own question.

9 posted on 03/11/2010 1:41:20 AM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

For which we will pay the Russians dearly ... as long as they even let us have access.


10 posted on 03/11/2010 1:42:32 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

Some of what the shuttle does is old tech.

But I saw a PPT presentation of what it takes to prepare it for orbit. Yes, it is a very daunting and expensive proposition. Yes, there are a million things that could go wrong.

Yes. People might die if someone screws up.

But it is one of the finest areas of material and engineering technology/research that we have.

We’ve learned a hell of a lot more from flying the shuttle than some stupid-a** I-Pod!


11 posted on 03/11/2010 1:42:46 AM PST by djf (Who says "The stuff of life" is not stuff? Mostly it's people who have the most stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

After we pay them to take up a satellite and they charge us for it but the satellite is sitting in pieces reverse engineered in Kazakhstan what city do you think they will nuke first?
Just wondering.


12 posted on 03/11/2010 1:48:14 AM PST by djf (Who says "The stuff of life" is not stuff? Mostly it's people who have the most stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: djf

Every dollar for space and Iraq means one less dollar for R E P A R A T I O N S such as 0boma-care


13 posted on 03/11/2010 1:48:46 AM PST by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: djf

Why would they nuke us? Their best course of action would be to wait and see if Obama collapses/surrenders the US first.


14 posted on 03/11/2010 2:06:12 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

In fact I doubt they would nuke us.

They have far more to fear from the Chinese, who sit on their borders and have like ten times the population, and only a quarter as much resources.

But can any patriotic American support us paying the Russians to be our taxi drivers? Why not pay them to captain and run the comm on our nuclear subs?

We’ve lost. Because the number of people who can sit and say “Help me” exceeds by large extent the number of people who say “I can...”

We are beggars, not doers. And will get what we deserve.


15 posted on 03/11/2010 2:17:19 AM PST by djf (Who says "The stuff of life" is not stuff? Mostly it's people who have the most stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
The chief of NASA's space shuttle program said Tuesday that the agency could technically continue to fly its three aging orbiters beyond their planned 2010 retirement if ordered to do so by President Barack Obama and lawmakers.

The same can be said of the Saturn V rocket and the Lunar Lander.

16 posted on 03/11/2010 2:21:19 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Without the Shuttles, can we maintain our satalites?


17 posted on 03/11/2010 2:35:56 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
That's about $2.4 billion a year that would be required to keep the shuttle flying beyond their 2010 retirement date, he said.

0bozo spent $2 billion on cash for clunkers, and has budgeted $4 billion for the criminal ACORN this year, yet he can't find $2.4 billion for the space shuttle?

18 posted on 03/11/2010 3:17:17 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
0bozo spent $2 billion on cash for clunkers, and has budgeted $4 billion for the criminal ACORN this year, yet he can't find $2.4 billion for the space shuttle?

This is the money quote of the year!

19 posted on 03/11/2010 3:58:34 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

It seems like about the only thing NASA is doing is “building” the Space Station, which I thought was going to come down in 6 years anyway. Are they actually using the
station for anything worthwhile?


20 posted on 03/11/2010 4:23:11 AM PST by Red Plank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson