Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin to turn her hand to making television documentaries
The Times of London ^
| March 5, 2010
| Tim Reid
Posted on 03/04/2010 9:37:34 PM PST by EveningStar
She may have failed to become Americas vice-president but Sarah Palins transformation into a successful public figure has taken a fresh twist, as she tries her hand as a television documentary maker...
Sources close to Mrs Palin yesterday denied initial reports that the putative idea was a reality series featuring her and her family. They said instead that it would be a documentary, which she would produce, about the people, wildlife and geography of the state of which she was governor until quitting abruptly in July last year...
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; burnett; markburnett; palin; reality; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: iopscusa
“Iâm a conservative libertarian”
And I am a Liberal Fundamentalist. /sarc
I wonder if he raises unicorns. They are as common “conservative libertarians”.
There is some overlap between conservatism and libertarianism,(just like there is some similarity between oatmeal and Fruit Loops) but the two philosophies are not compatible.
To: Friendofgeorge
Sarah never said that it was a reality show, one of the media blogs lied about it and even today after it was shown to be a documentary, the left is still calling it a reality show
42
posted on
03/05/2010 5:29:24 AM PST
by
Bigtigermike
(Loose lips sink ships, stay away RINO's)
To: EveningStar
The first 300 pages of her book are more an introduction to Alaska and Alaskans than Sarah. It makes perfect sense to offer a follow up travelogue to the millions who loved her book!
43
posted on
03/05/2010 6:00:03 AM PST
by
BillM
To: BillM
3 million readers and counting...
They’ll lap up the second book, too.
Do the arithmetic.
To: Bigtigermike
Yes thank you, High Tech Redneck said it was, I was only challenging him :)
45
posted on
03/05/2010 7:38:10 AM PST
by
Friendofgeorge
( SARAH PALIN or BUST.)
To: jla
You people
How telling of you!
To: presently no screen name
You should be more appreciative. I could have stated 'you Palin obsessed psychopaths'.
Yet, I chose the high road. :^)
47
posted on
03/05/2010 9:02:55 AM PST
by
jla
To: jla
You People?
Seems as though you are a list keeper.
48
posted on
03/05/2010 9:03:52 AM PST
by
ansel12
(Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
To: ZX12R
No, you keep a list because you're just as irrational and immature as the 'Romneybots' and the 'Paulistas'. You all behave alike.
49
posted on
03/05/2010 9:09:26 AM PST
by
jla
To: jla
I could have stated 'you Palin obsessed psychopaths'.
You know what's pathetic about you - you actually think your Alinsky tactic has value! But pawns are the last to know.
Go Conservative SARAH - Rock on PATRIOT! The LIBS are all wee wee'd up - just by the mention of your name. What POWER even your name has to lib media and their little pawns! With their addiction of you, they p*ss all over themselves when your name is mentioned.
They are like rats to cheese. This comical side show from these commie radicals is just another gift you give to the conservatives.
Hi Sarah. Hi Mom.
To: jla
“THE LIST” has you all wee wee’d up and enables you to reach YOUR highest asset - name calling.
To: EveningStar
You are an idiot................
To: RRTJSP...........
53
posted on
03/05/2010 3:45:06 PM PST
by
EveningStar
(Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
To: ansel12; presently no screen name
My memory of evening star is that she is a Romney/Rudy Giuliani, strongly anti social conservative, pro homosexual libertarian if that helps explain why she trolls against Governor Palin and other conservative subjects. I'm a "he." The rest of your post is nonsense.
54
posted on
03/05/2010 3:50:10 PM PST
by
EveningStar
(Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
To: EveningStar; presently no screen name
No you were definitely pro Rudy Giuliani, you were definitely pro homosexual, you were definitely strongly anti social conservative, you were definitely labeling yourself conservative-libertarian.
You like a more moderate candidate, not a social conservative that limits the GOP in your eyes.
55
posted on
03/05/2010 4:54:15 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
To: ansel12; presently no screen name
you were definitely labeling yourself conservative-libertarian That's the only part of your statement that's true.
56
posted on
03/06/2010 8:35:01 AM PST
by
EveningStar
(Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
To: EveningStar; ansel12
I saw nothing that says ‘conservative’ in your posts. From out of the mouth, the heart speaks.
Conservatives know their own.
To: EveningStar
That story does not exist at the links, or at the Times of London website.
58
posted on
03/06/2010 12:05:33 PM PST
by
3AngelaD
To: 3AngelaD
I just now tried it and it came up for me. You might be having a server problem.
59
posted on
03/06/2010 12:24:09 PM PST
by
EveningStar
(Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson