Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another new twist in birth certificate story: Hawaii "paper copy was destroyed in a fire"
World Net Daily ^ | March 2, 2010 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 03/03/2010 2:11:25 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

The Hawaii Department of Health claims to have an original copy of Barack Obama's birth certificate, right?

In fact, it is this established "fact" that has persuaded so many people there is nothing to the question of eligibility.

After all, an official in Hawaii has made a public pronouncement that she has inspected the document and declared on her own authority that Obama is a "natural born American" and thus eligible to serve as president.

For many Americans, that settles the question.

However, now a new version of the story is emerging.

The United Kingdom's Sky News reported Saturday: "Authorities in Hawaii have provided an electronic record of Obama's birth because the paper copy was destroyed in a fire which wiped out much of the state's archives."

Which is it?

Does Hawaii actually have an original long-form, paper birth certificate for Obama, or was it destroyed in a fire?

It seems the story is ever-changing.

And that's why it's time for Obama to come clean.

There is little question the heavily Democratic state of Hawaii has no interest in providing any information that would disqualify the first president claiming to be from that state.

If indeed the state has a copy of the original birth certificate, as Director of Health Dr. Chiyome Fukino claims, it should be no problem for Obama to give her permission to release it publicly – and, once and for all, settle the controversy that has resulted in that state being inundated with inquiries from curious American citizens.

Fukino has released two public statements on this matter.(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-368 next last
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Personally, I don’t know why someone just doesn’t get ahold of the airline records that will confirm that Stanley Ann Dunham traveled to kenya at about 8 months along and was too far along to be allowed on the plane when she attempted to return to the U.S. to give birth and, thus, she did not return from Kenya until after Obama’s claimed date of birth.

Airline passenger manifests from 1961? I doubt they exist. How would you know which airline, and just think of how many flights you'd have to check.

Besides, it doesn't matter. If BHO Sr is the father of record, he is not a Natural Born Citizen, even if he popped out on the beach at Waikiki, or on a surfboard on the North Shore.

221 posted on 03/03/2010 9:49:56 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Prove where Stanley Ann Dunham was on Aug. 4, 1961 and by default you also prove where Obama was born.

Only if you can also prove he was born on Aug. 4, 1961.

222 posted on 03/03/2010 9:52:22 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy; ComputerGuy

Lies from Columbia University???

http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=6485


223 posted on 03/03/2010 11:28:30 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Also you would have to prove Stanley was the mother. His grandmother could have been his mother.


224 posted on 03/03/2010 11:29:52 PM PST by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Glad to help. Just combining work of others. — FRegards ....


225 posted on 03/04/2010 3:23:21 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

“Authorities in Hawaii have provided an electronic record of Obama’s birth because the paper copy was destroyed in a fire which wiped out much of the state’s archives.”

Authorities — that’s the same as saying, “anonymous sources/source”.

It could be ‘fubar’, but do you know of any other ‘fubar’ report where WND falsely quoted ‘authorities’ or an anonymous source? They’ve been on the web for a long time. The only “mistake” I’ve personally ever seen is them reporting on foreign superstitious beliefs.


226 posted on 03/04/2010 3:28:04 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: esquirette

I agree. My previous post needs a modification. [No coffee yet.]

They apparently have an anonymous source. This, BTW, is a quote of sky news. So it’s not even up to WND. They simply quoted another source.


227 posted on 03/04/2010 3:30:38 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

“I conclude that the best intelligence agencies in the world - CIA KGB MI5 Mossad etc - all must want Soetero in the White House. Hopefully for different reasons.”

That’s an interesting way of looking at it and worthy of a thoughtful response.

I think the truth is more complicated. First off, the CIA is infiltrated with rats. If you read “American Spy”, you’ll learn how the CIA was skapegoated and neutered after the Pay of Pigs.

That’s probably why Porter Goss had to leave, and why Joe Wilson was able to make so much hay with his tea-sipping investigation of yellow cake. [Amazing how a cup of tea can expose every potential purchase for a hundred miles.]

Regulations hobble law abiding conservatives, but rats are above the law. Pretty sick in every federal agency.

Defectors from foreign countries even tried to bypass the CIA.

We would be more likely to learn something from a Lensner or Craig Livingston than from the CIA.

The KGB is not our friend. I would imagine they adore Putin like most of Russia. And as for the Mossad, they are overworked and probably hobbled by the left wingers in Israel.


228 posted on 03/04/2010 3:42:16 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Brit papers are exposing more scandals than the US papers because some of them have ties to the Mossad, and perhaps MI6 is more truth-oriented than other agencies. God bless the makers of James Bond films.

Did you know that “Mission Impossible” was orchestrated by the CIA for counter-propaganda? That was later made illegal in the US.


229 posted on 03/04/2010 3:46:46 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Bump! [Glad to help.]


230 posted on 03/04/2010 3:47:21 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Regarding the tie between the Sloppy Sock Bandit and Lanny Breuer, a quick browse of google did nothing to make this more clear than what you wrote.

Please let me see if I get this straight:

1. Samuel “Sandy” Berger hired Covington & Burling.

2. Lanny Breuer represented the US Justice Department during the Bush administration.

3. Lanny Breuer failed to prosecute vigorously and then praised Covington & Burling, saying that white collar criminals began saying that they “want a Berger”. [What a toady thing to say!]

4. Lanny Breuer is then rewarded [apparently quid pro quo] with an office in Covington & Burling.

Does that sum it up? Missing anything?


231 posted on 03/04/2010 4:18:21 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

The Clintons had a famous fire that burned up a ton of Whitewater papers. On the other hand, fires do happen. I am “certain” that if there was indeed a fire, then Obama will do his “level best” to compensate for that failing and release medical records, visas, school records, etc.


232 posted on 03/04/2010 4:21:16 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Glad to hear from you, old FRiend. =]

“But seriously, as I’ve said before, none of these “alternatives” are mutually exclusive.”

I agree as post 10 shows. [Nothing new though. I’m sure you’ve read it all before.]

“Is Obama evil or dumb? Well, actually, he’s both. He’s a Communist Muslim America hater determined to destroy the country, but he’s not terribly good at it. Much less competent than Stalin, Mao, or Hitler.”

I will agree that he’s a dictator-wannabe.

Obama admires Hugo Chavez and defended another dictator in, uh, that South-Central American country? [No coffee yet.]

Just as telling, he resents the “negative rights” in the Constitution.

As for the rest you posted, FRiend, please tell me what you REALLY think! [Grin.] I try to be a little more cautious in my own accusations, but everything you say is based on reporting more credible than the alphabet channels.

If there was a fire, he needs to be more forthcoming with other information.

“He’s badly in need of psychological counseling.”

And to resign. If he picks-and-flips in public and claims we are fifty seven states, combined with all the other erroneous statements, then yes — he is mentally unfit. Why? That’s for a treatment center to handle.

Congress once removed a judge from the bench for spitting and swearing. This is worse — clear poor demeanor. It’s their duty to impeach/remove, but they won’t and should pay the political price.

As for his qualification, I believe it’s important for history to remember the DNC’s lousy Annenberg vetting system.

— FRegards ....


233 posted on 03/04/2010 4:41:00 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

ROFL!


234 posted on 03/04/2010 4:46:04 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: bgill

[Grin.]

Seriously, it’s the sworn duty of each congressman to uphold the constitution and warn people if someone has not done enough to prove his/her qualifications. The party chair is also expected to defend his/her party’s dignity.

The desire to sort it out in court after the fact is a sign that something went terribly wrong in the vetting process.


235 posted on 03/04/2010 4:54:42 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

“Airline passenger manifests from 1961? I doubt they exist.”

Good point. I feel like an old geezer now, when sleuths lack an understanding of old fashioned paperwork.

For the record, I don’t think I asked that question. FRegards ...


236 posted on 03/04/2010 5:07:36 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner; DJ MacWoW
Because you can't a get fair shot at Obama in Court. Only the Senate can remove him from office, and then only if the House of Representatives first impeaches him. United States District Courts can't give advisory opinions, and the can't remove Obama from office, so they can't do squat.

What was it that happened in Honduras last year. Was it NOT their high court who ordered the military to remove their President, huh???

237 posted on 03/04/2010 6:19:56 AM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: danamco
What was it that happened in Honduras last year. Was it NOT their high court who ordered the military to remove their President, huh???

If you are unable to comprehend the distinction between the Honduran Constitution, and the United States Constitution, then...

You might be a Birther!

Apologies to Jeff Foxworthy.

238 posted on 03/04/2010 6:39:42 AM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner; DJ MacWoW
Hey beer fellow; you never addressed his post # 202!

As an true "AFTER-BIRTHER" you are, you just changed the subject!!

Which is the hallmarks of every "AFTER-BIRTHERS" including you!!!

239 posted on 03/04/2010 6:40:52 AM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

” What does he have to gain by perpetuating this controversy”

The other stuff that may have to be released if he gives in on this one, even if he’s legit...

He’s hiding something else in other records, school etc, that he doesn’t want us to see.

That’s my best guess...........


240 posted on 03/04/2010 6:44:20 AM PST by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-368 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson