Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bunning Accepts Deal Allowing Benefits Bill to Advance
RollCall.com ^ | 3/2/10 | John Stanton

Posted on 03/02/2010 4:05:42 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo

Under increasing pressure from Democrats and members of his own party, Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.) Tuesday night abandoned his one-man filibuster of a one-month extension to unemployment benefits and other programs.

In the end Bunning agreed to a deal allowing him one vote on an amendment to pay for the bill’s $10 billion cost. That proposal was offered by Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) last Thursday at the start of his filibuster, but Bunning rejected it because he feared his amendment would not pass.

Reid has also agreed to give Bunning two votes on amendments to a larger, one-year extension bill that is currently under consideration in the Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at rollcall.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: 111th; benefits; bunning; federalspending; kentucky; obama; politics; reid; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: jz638

No kidding. I may just have to tell my boss what I REALLY think tomorrow morning. I can worry about the repercussions of my actions oh... next year. Unless it gets extended again, of course.


21 posted on 03/02/2010 4:26:08 PM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787
It was NOT a filibuster and this bodes ill for reconciliation in the Senate - if it comes back.
This was a refusal for unanimous consent. Bunning was not conducting a filibuster. Reid could have called for a vote at any time; rather, Reid wanted to score political points.
Reid also wanted to provide cover for his caucus so that they would not have a recorded vote proving that they are violating PAYGO.
The MSM are being deliberately deceitful in calling this a filibuster. It was NOT. And they are going to continue this dirty spin with health care.

This is why I cancelled all my newspapers and get my news here. Yours is a concise and accurate description of what is really going on here. The article incorrectly calls this a fillibuster and makes no mention of 'unanimous consent'

22 posted on 03/02/2010 4:26:34 PM PST by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
The Democrats and Obama are bankrupting America.

Deliberately.

23 posted on 03/02/2010 4:26:40 PM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Under increasing pressure from Democrats and members of his own party, Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.)

This is why I have little hope for this country. The so-called "opposition party" is spineless and acts like an abused housewife - giving in, getting kicked in the teeth, and then coming back for more - all the while telling the voters, "Vote for us, we're different."

24 posted on 03/02/2010 4:27:08 PM PST by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Bunning may have won. He gets to add an amendment that will pay for this extension, most likely out of unused stimulus funds, instead of making it a new expenditure to be added to the deficit.


25 posted on 03/02/2010 4:28:13 PM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

So, 10 billion at about $800/month more or less. That’s over 12 million people who will get an extra month of benefits. Yet, not all 12 million have reached the end of benefits I’m guessing. So, who’s to say that, if by a miracle the economy bounces back and jobs open up, any of the 10 billion will be repealed. (Can you tell I’m in the process of filling out fed tax return and a have major case of the red-a$$?)


26 posted on 03/02/2010 4:31:44 PM PST by tfbcowinafog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

I knew it wouldn’t last.


27 posted on 03/02/2010 4:37:28 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS ... taxes, pain and slow death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

He made his point. Going beyond today may have compromised the Republicans stand against Health Care tomorrow and label them the “party of no”. There are too many of all parties involved in this damn unemploymnet and those folks are not viewing it as a spending priority.


28 posted on 03/02/2010 4:38:34 PM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

A one YEAR extension????

Why stop at one year? How heartless! Why not 5? Or ten?

I can’t find a job that will pay me what I want to be paid! Even though my unemployment insurance was only to cover a certain amount of time..I don’t care! Its the governments job to pay me!!! They paid those evil wall street bankers-Its my turn!


29 posted on 03/02/2010 4:38:54 PM PST by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RVN Airplane Driver

I believe Senator Bunning’s analysis was flawed. He should have stuck to his guns and the pubbies should have rallied to him. This is a tactical and strategic defeat. For example he could have rubbed the Dims nose in all the leftist funding they provide with our tax dollars. Demand they stop that and provide the money to the unemployment legislation. He could have demanded they drill for more oil to spur the economy and put people back to work. Just a couple of tactics he could have slapped the spend, spend, spebd Dims with. Strategically, it hurts the pubbies with their base b/c he stood all alone with no pubbie help. Tending to reinforce the perception, dare I say fact, that the pubbies simply won’t fight. I understand your point, I really do. Recall, a great Chinese general once said, “On death ground, FIGHT! Our nation is on that ground and IMHO it is past time to fight or there will be nothing left to fight for.


30 posted on 03/02/2010 4:39:34 PM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tfbcowinafog

Sounds like you need some road dust! :D)


31 posted on 03/02/2010 4:42:50 PM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kempster

True... I think that part of the problem is that there was no coordination. You get the impression that the GOP was caught off guard.

But the broader point is that if we can’t even hold up this little measure without taking a beating, can you imagine in the future trying to cut healthcare once its law. THAT is the ultimate goal of Obama ramming it through. Once the door is open, they will eventually push it all the way open.


32 posted on 03/02/2010 4:44:15 PM PST by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal; All

Bunning speaking live on the Senate floor on C-SPAN 2.


33 posted on 03/02/2010 4:44:55 PM PST by kristinn (A conspiracy of silence speaks louder than words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Point one: this wasn’t a filibuster, it was a denial of unanimous consent- the Senate’s way of passing massive amounts of legislation without pesky voting records to be used as campaign fodder later. Without unanimous consent there has to be an up or down vote on the measure and, depending on the structure, any accompanying amendments.

Point two: ALL of this could have been avoided. Sen. Reid knew when the unemployment benefits were going to expire. His staff knew. McConnell’s staff knew. The Secretary of the Senate knew. But, they scheduled the passage of the measure for extension under unanimous consent AFTER fighting tooth and nail on the “jobs bill” boondoggle because they thought they could just slip one in- again.

They do this ALL the time. They thought that denying consent would be a political poison pill and no one would try it. They forgot that Bunning doesn’t give a sh** about what people think. He’s following his conscience and making a stand- something we’ve been shouting for our elected officials to do for years!

Point Three: Lots of folks here and on other conservative forums have long decried Republicans being out-maneuvered on the Senate floor. Bunning just forced everyone to go on record voting for specific measures of this extension. We now have the very campaign fodder they tried to deny us. Bunning handed Tea Partiers fiscally damning votes on a silver platter.

Y’all might try saying thanks.


34 posted on 03/02/2010 4:47:42 PM PST by brothers4thID (http://scarlettsays.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
From Politico:

SNIP

Democrats threatened to keep the Senate in the chamber all night to inflict maximum pain on Republicans, and Bunning threatened to block all future nominations.

But both sides backed down, with a vote on a Bunning amendment and vote on final passage of the temporary 30-day extension.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who has avoided the controversy over his home-state colleague, said that he was “pleased that Sen. Bunning will have an opportunity to offer the amendments that he thinks are important and that he has been stressing for the last few days. And I’m glad we were able to work this out and move with the business of the Senate.”

Bunning will get a vote at 8:30 p.m. Tuesday night on his amendment that would require the package to be paid for, and he tossed one final brushback at his Democratic opponents.

“I hope Senate Democrats tonight vote for their own pay-fors and show Americans that they are committed to fiscal discipline,” Bunning said. “I will be watching them closely and checking off the hypocrites one by one.”

35 posted on 03/02/2010 4:47:58 PM PST by kristinn (A conspiracy of silence speaks louder than words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nuc1
Sounds like you need some road dust!

There ain't enough road dust in this country to ease the pain of knowing goobermint got another 50 large from this family.
36 posted on 03/02/2010 4:48:37 PM PST by tfbcowinafog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Media Ignores Bomb Threats at Senator Bunning’s Offices
37 posted on 03/02/2010 4:51:35 PM PST by retrogo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brothers4thID; All

OT.....I don’t have a story link for this breaking news.....

HOWEVER......

“Long-time Congressional Democrat Charlie Rangel to give up chairmanship of powerful House committee as early as tonight - NBC”

http://twitter.com/BreakingNews


38 posted on 03/02/2010 4:52:03 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (Political Correctness Will Get Us All Killed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tfbcowinafog
Their time is coming. Don't let em get ya down.
39 posted on 03/02/2010 4:52:10 PM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: paul544

Mean republicans blocking extended unemployment money! How horrible those people are. /s


40 posted on 03/02/2010 4:52:49 PM PST by bicyclerepair (FR - my online family. From Ft. Lauderdale, Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson