Posted on 03/02/2010 1:15:47 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
U.S. Attorneys with the Department of Justice have moved to dismiss Orly Taitz's Quo Warranto case for lack of jurisdiction. Additionally, the U.S. Attorneys' Office asserts that any judicial or bar sanctions against Dr. Taitz are the consequences of her own actions.
"Although, to Defendant's knowledge, this is Dr. Taitz’s first case in which she serves as Plaintiff, this is not her first bite at the apple, or even her second: she has unsuccessfully represented plaintiffs in at least three judicial districts seeking to raise similar claims. In each of these cases, the United States district courts have declined to find jurisdiction and have denied relief similar to the ultimate relief sought here.
Dr. Taitz's Complaint suffers from exactly the same defects that doomed many of her previous litigation efforts. Simply put, her allegations about the President's citizenship are not a concrete and particularized injury, as required to establish standing under the "case or controversy" requirement of Article III, and the harms that she has suffered from judicial and/or bar sanctions for her conduct in litigation are the consequences of her own actions and not in any way traceable to any legal claim cognizable against Defendant."
As attachments to the Motion to Dismiss, the U.S. Attorneys' Office filed the dockets from Cook v. Good, Barnett v. Obama, and Rhodes v. McDonnell and a citation from Judge Clayton Land’s opinion in Rhodes v. McDonnell as examples of Dr. Taitz's failed litigation and contemptible conduct.
Dr. Taitz responded on her blog that she's too busy to look at the filings but will comment when she has a chance to read them.
Additionally, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied Dr. Taitz's motion to reinstate her appeal in Cook v. Good, which she filed late and printed double-sided in violation of court rules. The docket and the case are now closed.
I was hoping you would do this!!!
Hey, BTW, I have found out there is a Birther Grotto of True Evidence that they are holding back so none of us will tell Eric Holder. ROTFLMAO!!! Like a bunch of clowns, I suspect the Grotto is full of lemon meringue pies and seltzer bottles and at the proper moment, not now of course because its secret, but at the proper time, they will bust out of the Grotto and throw pies at each other and shoot seltzer down each other’s pants.....Too funny......
parsy, who is having way too much fun with their antics....
Keep on keepin’ on, Orly. Doing something and failing is better than doing nothing and maintaining the status quo. This gal is a true American (maybe not natural born, like our Prez) coz’ she never gives up.
Exactly why the court should grant her DISCOVERY.
Secret pies and seltzer and classified clown shoes have far
more influence than the regular kind. You WILL be assimilated.
She's busy filling out forms to run as California Secretary of State. She and Jerry Brown would be great together: Governor Moonbeam and SOS Moonbat.
As I understand quo warranto, the petition is filed in the name of the United States. If the U.S. Attorneys’ office won’t file it, one must ask the court for leave to file it. Only “interested persons” or an interested “third party” may petition the court. Standing is relevant.
I have what I’m sure will be perceived as a stupid question. Why are United States attorneys requesting this be dismissed and not Obama’s lawyers?
What a hack. Who is this woman?
>> Dr. Taitz responded on her blog that she’s too busy to look at the filings but will comment when she has a chance to read them.
Blogging about your legal proceedings is always a good idea. Its also a good idea to put in writing that you don’t have time to read your opponent’s motion.
>> Additionally, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied Dr. Taitz’s motion to reinstate her appeal in Cook v. Good, which she filed late and printed double-sided in violation of court rules
Good grief. Completely incompetent. If she actually represented anyone but her self, she should be sued for malpractice.
SnakeDoc
The DOJ defends the POTUS in any litigation, except in the case of Clinton who was sued for his as Governor of Arkansas. He had to provide his own defense.
Hopefully this will finish her off and we won’t have to hear about this ridiculous garbage any longer
I forgot the H/T to you on this. Thanks for the information.
We’re thinking she’ll turn up on a reality show fixing teeth and giving legal advice.
Add to your list stalking Supreme Court Justices.
I will go down swinging!
parsy, who will Resist!
Or giving legal advice on how to fix teeth.
I have a funny feeling she won’t quit until she is sitting in a cell.
And, appealing to the United Nations for protection!
parsy
Any judicial action against Orly is a direct result of her own actions and not malicious prosecution or persecution. As far as the persecution by Obama supporters, she can’t sue Obama for their actions.
filings.....fillings? Seen one, seen em all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.