[SnakeDoctor]

What a hack. Who is this woman?

>> Dr. Taitz responded on her blog that she’s too busy to look at the filings but will comment when she has a chance to read them.

Blogging about your legal proceedings is always a good idea. Its also a good idea to put in writing that you don’t have time to read your opponent’s motion.

>> Additionally, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied Dr. Taitz’s motion to reinstate her appeal in Cook v. Good, which she filed late and printed double-sided in violation of court rules

Good grief. Completely incompetent. If she actually represented anyone but her self, she should be sued for malpractice.

SnakeDoc

[lucysmom]

Blogging about your legal proceedings is always a good idea. Its also a good idea to put in writing that you don’t have time to read your opponent’s motion.

Add to your list stalking Supreme Court Justices.

[MilspecRob]

Good grief. Completely incompetent. If she actually represented anyone but her self, she should be sued for malpractice.

Major Stefan F. Cook would have a good case.

[tired_old_conservative]

“Good grief. Completely incompetent. If she actually represented anyone but her self, she should be sued for malpractice.”

And what, given her track records, makes you think it is beyond Orly to sue herself? She has clearly caused herself specific harm, and would thus have standing.