Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/27/2010 11:22:28 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Steelfish
What they really should be concerned with is that the 2+ billion will be flushed down the drain by an endless stream of enviromental studies and lawsuits by the moonbats before a single piece of track is layed.

If California was willing to destroy its agriculture industry because they were told it would endanger a 2 inch fish, imagine what its going to take to implement high speed trains in that state.

2 posted on 02/27/2010 11:28:26 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

The only aspect of this train that will ultimately be successful will be that which leads out of California.


6 posted on 02/28/2010 12:11:00 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
No one will ride the thing and I don't want to subsidize their stagecoach to nowhere!
8 posted on 02/28/2010 12:27:06 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
By all means, piss away another 2 billion on some Socialist scam. Please list any passenger any rail system, world wide, that has been in the black, WITHOUT SUBSIDY, in the last century.

(Hint: the answer is zero.)
The US government had to require, by legislation, the continuation of passenger rail just to get the mail delivered in the 1930's. Freight has paid for itself, and supported passenger service for 100 years.

9 posted on 02/28/2010 12:41:46 AM PST by jonascord (We've got the Constitution to protect us. Why should we worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

The math on this is ridiculous from every perspective.

They are counting on 40 million boarders ? That is 110,000 people taking a high-speed train per day every day of the year. Do that many people really need to travel between San Diego, LA, San Fran, Sacramento ? Daily ?

They are saying they need to charge $105 per fare. Why ? The freight company CSX moves a ton of freight 400 miles by rail for a few dollars according to their commercials.

They need $4B per year to meet operating costs ? That seems like an awful lot.


10 posted on 02/28/2010 12:55:05 AM PST by Kellis91789 (Democrat: Someone who supports killing children, but protests executing convicted murderers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

highspeed rail through earthquake country is about the dumbest thing I can think of to waste more money


13 posted on 02/28/2010 1:49:26 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Here’s a perfect example of something that’s just too expensive to implement.

If it’s $42B for the first 520 miles of an 800 mile system, let’s go ahead and double it to $85B. We know the final price would be higher. And that’s just to build the thing.

Now to borrowing costs. Let’s pretend that there are people or institutions who would buy 30-year CA bonds in the first place. But we can’t pretend as well that they’ll go along with a couple of percent interest. Let’s say the bonds pay eight percent.

Just doing the simple math of $85B at 8% instead of working int out with a loan calculation program gives $6.8B per year in interest needing to be paid. Divide that by the article’s ridership figure of 60M people per year to get a fare of $113 per person as an absolute minimum just to pay the bond interest for what they built.

Oops, excuse me, according to the article, a fare of $105 drops ridership by 1/3, from 60M to 40M, moving that bond-interest-per-ride figure from $113 to $170, which by the same economic reasoning would cut ridership some more, etc. We’re looking at $200 per ticket to break even on interest payments alone.

I leave it to others more familiar with the day to day costs of running a business to offer suggestions as to how much more needs to be added to that $113 fare for the expenses of running the railroad itself — fuel, salaries, advertisements, etc.

NFW can this thing be anything but a complete money pit.


18 posted on 02/28/2010 5:15:24 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Make the politicians pay when the costs soar!
If we required politicians to post a personal guarantee bond, payable to charity, if the costs of projects they supported soared, I bet these boondoggles would never be approved.


19 posted on 02/28/2010 5:21:21 AM PST by CivilWarguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

The some are correct.


21 posted on 02/28/2010 5:28:05 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Some Fear California’s High-Speed Rail Won’t Deliver On Early Promises,

Most Conservatives Know California’s High-Speed Rail Won’t Deliver On Early Promises.


22 posted on 02/28/2010 5:39:26 AM PST by flowerplough ( Pennsylvania today - New New Jersey meets North West Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
I think the biggest problem with high-speed rail--besides the frightening cost of buying right of way and installing and powering up all that overhead wiring!--comes down to this:

JR West Nozomi 500 train passing station at 300 km/h

This is a YouTube video of a JR West Nozomi 500 train passing a train station at 300 km/h (186 mph). Now imagine this at an even higher speed--the 220 mph maximum that the proposed California High-Speed Rail system will use. The noise level would be so intense that unless the State of California is willing to pay to sound-insulate every building within 150 feet of the tracks (like JNR did before they split into JR East and JR West!), high-speed rail is a non-starter.

23 posted on 02/28/2010 5:39:53 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
83% of Americans Think More Money Should Go to High Speed Rail
25 posted on 02/28/2010 6:19:45 AM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish; All

Even if they use the freeways and put the thing in the middle it to reduce right of way costs. Its still going to ccst more than the allocated ammount. Instead of doing all of this here is what a true socialist would have done;
http://www.theusmat.com/natldesksatire.htm. Order traffic guards 24/7 throughout the US at all RR crossings...


26 posted on 02/28/2010 6:25:53 AM PST by mosesdapoet ("There's still no MSM mention of Obama's extravagant life style while millions are unemployed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

As I sat in my car at an LA intersection, I looked over to the east and saw a huge train going by;

10 or 15 passenger cars in the train;

2 or 3 human heads sticking up in the windows.

Daily loss of ....???????????


27 posted on 02/28/2010 7:29:13 AM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

What is it with Liberals and choo choo trains?

Their Euro envy is not enough to explain it.

Not enough toys as kids or what?

Cheers,

knewshound


28 posted on 02/28/2010 7:41:20 AM PST by knews_hound (Credo Quia Absurdium--take nothing seriously unless it is absurd. E. Clampus Vitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson