Skip to comments.
Widow of Austin plane crash victim sues pilot's wife
CNN ^
| 2-24-10
Posted on 02/24/2010 6:31:54 PM PST by cajuncow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 401-403 next last
1
posted on
02/24/2010 6:31:55 PM PST
by
cajuncow
To: cajuncow
Reason #73443948394843562343 why we need tort reform NOW.
2
posted on
02/24/2010 6:34:21 PM PST
by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: cajuncow
3
posted on
02/24/2010 6:34:30 PM PST
by
Doc Savage
(SOBAMP!)
To: cajuncow
Wow, now this is a reach.
4
posted on
02/24/2010 6:35:01 PM PST
by
Marty62
(former Marty60)
To: cajuncow
Let’s remember that the man who was killed served two tours in Vietnam. He is the aggrieved party.
I can’t blame his family.
5
posted on
02/24/2010 6:35:42 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: cajuncow
That sure didn’t take long!
6
posted on
02/24/2010 6:36:10 PM PST
by
iowamark
To: BunnySlippers
Why, will suing the wife bring him back?
7
posted on
02/24/2010 6:36:50 PM PST
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: cajuncow
No case. This will go no where in the court.
8
posted on
02/24/2010 6:37:24 PM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. - H. L. Menken.)
To: cajuncow
...were the 9-11 victim’s families able to sue the Saudis?...I can’t remember.
To: Doc Savage
Should Stack’s wife be able to collect on any insurance policy? O think the victim’s wife should get it.
10
posted on
02/24/2010 6:37:42 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: cajuncow
Lawyers will do all right money-wise with this one. *SIGH*
To: cajuncow
A relative of the Jersey Girls?
To: brytlea
Suing is never about bringing back the dead, silly.
13
posted on
02/24/2010 6:38:23 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: cajuncow
How
could she "know" or "should have known" something like that? Wives are not mind-readers, sorry.
What about a counter-suit? Suppose the victim "had a bad feeling" about going to work that day but didn't heed it and his wife told him to go? Who do you sue then?
To: cajuncow
15
posted on
02/24/2010 6:38:50 PM PST
by
mylife
(Opinions: $1.00 Halfbaked: 50c)
To: pnh102
Reason #73443948394843562343 why we need tort reform NOW.Her husband was killed by this maniac. Have you no mercy?
16
posted on
02/24/2010 6:38:50 PM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: BunnySlippers
True, it’s about filling the pockets of lawyers.
17
posted on
02/24/2010 6:38:56 PM PST
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: cajuncow
“alleging she she knew or should have known that her husband was a threat to others”
And exactly what was she suppose to have done about it? They don’t put crazy people in the loony bin anymore...
18
posted on
02/24/2010 6:39:48 PM PST
by
babygene
(Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
To: BunnySlippers
"I cant blame his family." No, but we can blame the tort pushers that sunk their claws into his family, before their husband's/father's body has been in the ground a week.
Suing the attacker's estate would be the normal and proper course. But, it's clear that won't bear fruit, so the blood-suckers pick another victim.
To: FormerACLUmember
It might, but only if the wife stands to gain money as a result of his death.
Then she should rightly give it up to the victim’s widow.
20
posted on
02/24/2010 6:40:22 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 401-403 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson