Conservatives can kiss off Hot Air blog

Renew America ^ | Feb 21, 2010 | Bryan Fischer

[freemike]

You’re absolutely right! It’s never been about us invading their freakin bedrooms! If they’d only keep it in their bedrooms there’d be no problem! No, they want to have their sex in the streets, in our schools and in our faces!

[grey_whiskers]

Michelle sold the site to Salem Sodom.

There, all fixed Brokeback.

Cheers!

[grey_whiskers]

or on religious texts descended themselves from more primitive man’s stories and legends

Yeah, you're a lib.

You know, petitio principii and all that.

Cheers!

[GeronL]

lol

[roses of sharon]

Yes, they want their own identity, their own TV shows, their own studies at k-12 and Universities, their own marriages, their own laws, conventions, parades, political groups, until they get some pushback.

Then they head for the privacy of their bedrooms again, where their sex habits should have remained.

[muawiyah]

Thanks. BTW, I've been working over the litany for several years ~ since November 2006 in fact. It gets better and shorter, and eventually I may achieve a soundbyte that everyone can accept as true under all conditions.

You have to roll these things through extraordinary periods of time though. I started with the "Purge the RINOs" deal in 1996 ~ and yet, that expression is not yet complete because sometimes the only guy we can get to run as a Republican is, in fact, a RINO, and in those cases if it means the difference between controlling the legislative agenda for 2 years or 20 years, you sometimes have to go with the RINO.

However, you must never let a RINO insert himself into the inner workings of the Republican party, nor allow him to portray himself as some sort of Moderate Conservatives. We don't want any of them either!

[Skywalk]

I’m a libertarian (domestically) and old-style conservative in foreign policy (which I take to include border policy.)

I’m glad you gave me some allowance at the end there but I’m not a RINO or anything of the sort. If anything, I’m just more radically individualist than you. I go by the typical moral code of non-coercion of others, until they transgress against this code themselves. At least that’s what I’m saying in the simplest form.

And I’m sure you know, the ‘memes’ and ways in which things are expressed is often descended from unfortunate things. any ‘right-wing’ expressions of patriotism descend from that son of a bitch Woodrow Wilson’s ‘progressive’ era fascist reign over the States (he was a nascent fascist, a tyrant and a virulent racist of the worst kind.)

[grey_whiskers]

Ah, yes, carefully avoiding the issue of infiltration of queers into the Church.

If you've been FReeping awhile, you can find re-posted somewhere that famous article from the Congressional Record in 1963 or so, about the goals of the Communist Party in order to effectuate a takedown of the US.

Gay rights, sexualization of children (abolishing all laws on age of consent), etc., etc.

But that's right--it's all due to "loathing" of homosexuals.

In fact -- taking as guidance the near-universal truism that leftists project onto conservatives all of their own sins -- and combining the constant talk of "hate and loathing" towards homosexuals --

it is all but a foregone conclusion that all of the hatred and loathing of homosexuals is SELF-HATRED : which is why something as fundamental as their own sexuality is degraded into a deeply self-destructive, consuming obsession.

Which is another reason homosexuality should be discouraged, and its victims saved from themselves, much as a drug addict or alcoholic should be rescued.

Cheers!

[AliVeritas]

What is your take on Christian love?

[muawiyah]

BTW, the historically minded Conservatives take the Libertarian position on drugs to be the same as proposing we all become like the Chinese of the late 18th century when they decided to abandon one of Earth's great civilizations and retreat to opium dens.

The Brits soon joined them by taking on the difficult task of dealing dope.

Since Conservatives don't care to become Chinese, we are usually mystified about why Libertarians do!

[Bryan24]

Leviticus isn’t the final word. In Romans and 1 Corinthians, homosexuality is clearly and explicitly condemned.

[grey_whiskers]

any ‘right-wing’ expressions of patriotism descend from that son of a bitch Woodrow Wilson’s ‘progressive’ era fascist reign over the States (he was a nascent fascist, a tyrant and a virulent racist of the worst kind.)

Umm, bullshit.

Look up the OLD Maryland State Anthem -- "The despot's heel is on thy shore...Huzzah! She spurns the Northern Scum".

Speaking of Lincoln.

Don't tell me you're going to suggest that the "Right-Wingers" in the Deep South get their identity primarily from Wilson...? /cheap shot>

Cheers!

[jagusafr]

“I have to abhor homosexual human beings to be a ‘conservative.’”

Hunh? What I see, what is scriptural, is, “Love the sinner and hate the sin”. THAT’s what militant homosexuals can’t stand: that Christians can truly do those two things.

Colonel, USAFR

[muawiyah]

You outed her quite quickly.

Boy is Obama gonna' be antry with her at the next Cabinet meeting.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

Haven't had time to really read this yet - but wade in if you're so inclined. The homosexual agenda supporters seem to be in full - swing - as usual. Naturally, they will never address any actual issues.

[Skywalk]

Why are you focused on gays getting into the Church? That was never part of the original content of the discussion and you’ll forgive me if I don’t address every point when I’m doing other things at the same time as posting to you.

I’m not Catholic and that’s their problem. I’m not Anglican but I think it’s foolish for them to embrace practicing homosexuals and I despise leftist religion, which only disguises itself in religious faith but just acts as another arm of leftist ideology.

I didn’t know the various churches issues with homosexual ‘infiltration’ (though I think some fled there thinking it would help them manage their impulses) was something I should worry about. The problem is no different than describing Gramscian infiltration and corruption of any organization or institution. I oppose leftist and collectivist politics, therefore I’d oppose any aspect of such movement. But such tactics are not unique to leftist gays, so I don’t get why I’m supposed to address it.

If your church is having difficulty with it, I have no issue with you standing up against it. People should openly declare their intentions and not try to corrupt an institution in order to further their ends.

Same thing with the Liberation Theology mess. So—what is the point in talking about it, again?

[manc]

when you say gays you mean homosexuals.

I won’t play the left’s or the homoseuxals word game

[manc]

one only has to look at MA to see what homosexuals have done on society so one only has to think that either they can stick their head in the sand or get a grip and stop this crap.

if one thinks that a guy wanting to stick his dick up another mans ass is OK and we have to have that now taught in schools is OK then they are just as bad as those who do it

the conservative platform is traditional marriage and family not some queer Hi Mom In see your in bed with Mom can I go out to play

Of course we have the usual ignorants who say well I know one and they are nice

ARF

maybe they should get to a homo parade and see how they really act

[philetus]

And I’m getting tired of reading on FRepublic how I have to abhor homosexual human beings to be a ‘conservative.

Then why come here.It won’t bother me if you don’t show up again and think how much better you’ll feel.

[manc]

Agreed it is high time for the GOP to say that the platform is for normal marriage and normal families

still even though Jim R state this is not a site for the queers and their friends they still come on here trying to push their agenda

sickening