Posted on 02/22/2010 4:34:40 AM PST by SJackson
Jerusalem, February 22, 2010 - A section of an ancient city wall of Jerusalem from the tenth century B.C.E. - possibly built by King Solomon -- has been revealed in archaeological excavations directed by Dr. Eilat Mazar and conducted under the auspices of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
The section of the city wall revealed, 70 meters long and six meters high, is located in the area known as the Ophel, between the City of David and the southern wall of the Temple Mount.
Uncovered in the city wall complex are: an inner gatehouse for access into the royal quarter of the city, a royal structure adjacent to the gatehouse, and a corner tower that overlooks a substantial section of the adjacent Kidron valley.
The excavations in the Ophel area were carried out over a three-month period with funding provided by Daniel Mintz and Meredith Berkman, a New York couple interested in Biblical Archeology. The funding supports both completion of the archaeological excavations and processing and analysis of the finds as well as conservation work and preparation of the site for viewing by the public within the Ophel Archaeological Park and the national park around the walls of Jerusalem.
The excavations were carried out in cooperation with the Israel Antiquities Authority, the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, and the Company for the Development of East Jerusalem. Archaeology students from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem as well as volunteer students from the Herbert W. Armstrong College in Edmond, Oklahoma, and hired workers all participated in the excavation work.
"The city wall that has been uncovered testifies to a ruling presence. Its strength and form of construction indicate a high level of engineering", Mazar said. The city wall is at the eastern end of the Ophel area in a high, strategic location atop the western slop of the Kidron valley.
"A comparison of this latest finding with city walls and gates from the period of the First Temple, as well as pottery found at the site, enable us to postulate with a great degree of assurance that the wall that has been revealed is that which was built by King Solomon in Jerusalem in the latter part of the tenth century B.C.E.," said Mazar
"This is the first time that a structure from that time has been found that may correlate with written descriptions of Solomon's building in Jerusalem," she added. "The Bible tells us that Solomon built -- with the assistance of the Phoenicians, who were outstanding builders -- the Temple and his new palace and surrounded them with a city, most probably connected to the more ancient wall of the City of David." Mazar specifically cites the third chapter of the First Books of Kings where it refers to "until he (Solomon) had made an end of building his own house, and the house of the Lord, and the wall of Jerusalem round about."
The six-meter-high gatehouse of the uncovered city wall complex is built in a style typical of those from the period of the First Temple like Megiddo, Beersheva and Ashdod. It has symmetrical plan of four identical small rooms, two on each side of the main passageway. Also there was a large, adjacent tower, covering an area of 24 by 18 meters, which was intended to serve as a watchtower to protect entry to the city. The tower is located today under the nearby road and still needs to be excavated. Nineteenth century British surveyor Charles Warren, who conducted an underground survey in the area, first described the outline of the large tower in 1867 but without attributing it to the era of Solomon.
"Part of the city wall complex served as commercial space and part as security stations," explained Mazar. Within the courtyard of the large tower there were widespread public activities, she said. It served as a public meeting ground, as a place for conducting commercial activities and cult activities, and as a location for economic and legal activities.
Pottery shards discovered within the fill of the lowest floor of the royal building near the gatehouse also testify to the dating of the complex to the 10th century B.C.E. Found on the floor were remnants of large storage jars, 1.15 meters in height, that survived destruction by fire and that were found in rooms that apparently served as storage areas on the ground floor of the building. On one of the jars there is a partial inscription in ancient Hebrew indicating it belonged to a high-level government official.
"The jars that were found are the largest ever found in Jerusalem," said Mazar, adding that "the inscription that was found on one of them shows that it belonged to a government official, apparently the person responsible for overseeing the provision of baked goods to the royal court."
In addition to the pottery shards, cult figurines were also found in the area, as were seal impressions on jar handles with the word "to the king," testifying to their usage within the monarchy. Also found were seal impressions (bullae) with Hebrew names, also indicating the royal nature of the structure. Most of the tiny fragments uncovered came from intricate wet sifting done with the help of the salvaging Temple Mount Sifting Project, directed by Dr. Gabriel Barkai and Zachi Zweig, under the auspice of the Nature and Parks Authority and the Ir David Foundation.
Between the large tower at the city gate and the royal building the archaeologists uncovered a section of the corner tower that is eight meters in length and six meters high. The tower was built of carved stones of unusual beauty.
East of the royal building, another section of the city wall that extends for some 35 meters also was revealed. This section is five meters high, and is part of the wall that continues to the northeast and once enclosed the Ophel area.
Photos available via e-mail upon request and at the following link: http://bit.ly/cRvAeH
For further information: Jerry Barach, Dept. of Media Relations, the Hebrew University, Tel: 02-588-2904. Orit Sulitzeanu, Hebrew University spokesperson, Tel: 054-8820016.
Earthquakes would contribute. but as you say. The city was there in Abraham’s time. It was destroyed, then rebuilt by Herod in grand style, then that was destroyed, and then in Hadrian’s time, really destroyed.
Waiting for the goat fornicators to start rioting over this “offensive to islam” find.
“That BCE business is like nails on a chalkboard.”
OK, it was the year 2761 using the correct calendar established by G-d, instead of the pagan Roman calendar.
OK, it was the year 2761 using the correct calendar established by G-d, instead of the pagan Roman calendar.
WOW! When I was there, they had found city walls dating back to King Hezekiah, 45 feet below the present city street level.
King Solomon’s walls would be YEARS older than even THAT!
Wow. This is fascinating.
bump
“OK, it was the year 2761 using the correct calendar established by G-d, instead of the pagan Roman calendar.”
Where did you get that? I have never heard of a calendar ESTABLISHED by God. What’s wrong...are you afraid of typing GOD??? What does any of that have to do with what I said anyway? Before one comments they should discern what the party they are going to rebut has said.
Oh I like that one!
Only for people who read aloud.
I have never heard of a calendar ESTABLISHED by God.In that case, using BCE instead of BC doesn't "qualify as evil" as you claimed ex cathedra.
|
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks exit82 for the ping. Thanks SJackson for the topic and comment. And thanks muawiyah, ASAVet, babble-on, Jewbacca, and Drumbo for your responses. |
||
|
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
|||
I can almost hear the Palestinians now claiming Israelis were never there that long ago and this is all a lie yada yada.
Thanks SJackson.
“In that case, using BCE instead of BC doesn’t “qualify as evil” as you claimed ex cathedra.”
That is your argument for supporting taking Christ out of the dating of his own era? Your kidding right? Of course it is evil to take Christ out of the Christian era...and the obvious proof of that is that the era still exists as a time line, it is just Christ that was taken out of it. If that isn’t evil, then there is no evil...
I would suggest that you are the pretender of authority here...my argument stands...you did not even begin to counter it.
Not only a great article about an important work, but, for once, PHOTOS! GOOD photos, at that,
Photos available via e-mail upon request and at the following link: http://bit.ly/cRvAeH
Of course, I can just hear the Palis now, “sneaky Zionist Entity Jooooos sneaked in underground, and built this, then dug it up just to try to prove they have a claim!”
Nineteenth century British surveyor Charles Warren, who conducted an underground survey in the area, first described the outline of the large tower in 1867 but without attributing it to the era of Solomon.
I knew Warren discovered Hezekiah's tunnel, and had drawn maps of the city, but this was new to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.