Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin: I have no idea what philosophy Glenn Beck is promoting. And neither does he
Mark Levin Fan ^ | February 21, 2010 | Mark R. Levin

Posted on 02/21/2010 1:14:06 PM PST by Sergeant Tim

I was invited to be the opening speaker at Saturday's CPAC session. I had accepted but then, to my amazement, I learned that the John Birch Society would be one of many co-sponsors. This takes the big-tent idea many steps too far for me. So, I withdrew. Apparently, others were not so moved. That's fine. But it wasn't for me. Bill Buckley and Barry Goldwater, among others, chased the Birchers from the movement decades ago. And they're not a part of the movement. So, to give them a booth at CPAC was boneheaded.

I want to commend Bill Bennett for his wise piece this morning on the Corner. I agree with him.

I have no idea what philosophy Glenn Beck is promoting. And neither does he. It's incoherent. One day it's populist, the next it's libertarian bordering on anarchy, next it's conservative but not really, etc. And to what end? I believe he has announced that he is no longer going to endorse candidates because our problems are bigger than politics. Well, of course, our problems are not easily dissected into categories, but to reject politics is to reject the manner in which we try to organize ourselves. This is as old as Plato and Aristotle. Why would conservatives choose to surrender the political battlefield to our adversaries -- who are trashing this society -- when we must retake it in order to preserve our society? Philosophy, politics, culture, family, etc., are all of one. Edmund Burke, among others, wrote about it extensively, and far better that I possibly can. But all elements of the civil society require our defense. Besides, why preach such a strategy when conservatism is on the rise and the GOP is acting more responsibly?

Moreover, when he does discuss politics, which, ironically, is often, how can he claim today that there is no difference between the two parties when, but for the Republicans in Congress, government-run health care, cap-and-trade, card check, and a long list of other disastrous policies would already be law? The GOP is becoming more conservative thanks to the grass-roots movement and a political uprising across the country, which has even reached into New Jersey and Massachusetts. Why keep pretending otherwise? My only conclusion is that he is promoting a third party or some third way, which is counter-productive to defeating Obama and the Democrat Congress. These are perilous times and this kind of an approach will keep the statists in power for decades.

And what of his flirtations with Ron Paul's lunacy respecting America's supposed provocations with her enemies, including al-Qaeda? Why should such a fatal defect in thinking be ignored? Do we conservatives agree with this?

Finally, Beck is fond of congratulating himself for being the only or the first host to criticize George Bush's spending. This is demonstrably false. I not only attacked his spending, but the creation of the Homeland Security Department, the prescription drug add-on for Medicare, his "moderate" tax cuts, as well as his nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, "comprehensive immigration reform," and so forth. And I was not alone -- Rush and Sean did the same, for example. And as someone who fought liberal Republicans in the trenches when campaigning for Reagan in 1976 and 1980, I don't need lectures from Beck, who was nowhere to be found, about big-spending Republicans. But this is not about me, or Beck, or Beck's past drunkenness (which he endlessly wears as some kind of badge of honor). It is about preserving our society for our children and grandchildren. Beck spent precious little time aiming fire at Obama-Pelosi-Reid in his speech, and it is they who are destroying our country.

On as a positive note, I am personally happy to see that Beck has cleaned up his public act -- as best I can tell, no more boiling fake frogs on TV or pretending to pour gasoline on someone -- and the rest of it. But I do think his speech, which contained nuggets of truth heard before and read elsewhere, including on Rush's show and in my book and many other books, may have distracted from some of the more compelling and coherent speeches at the event, including Marco Rubio's superb speech. I fear the media will see to this. I hope not.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allenwest; beatupbeck; beck; beckisajackass; beckisfubar; beckisgoofy; bennett; circusclownbeck; conservatism; cpac; cpac2010; february; glenkook; glennbeck; holdonnow; levin; marklevin; mormon; paul; pimp4mormons; pimpforldsbeck; politics; ronpaul; ronpaulssmartguy; rubio; talkradio; thirdpartykook; vote4rubio; west4congress
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 1,261-1,267 next last
To: upsdriver
the beck caucus in congress is gonna be a small one - wonder what they will accomplish?

(other than throwing spitballs at the other caucuses)

541 posted on 02/21/2010 5:27:42 PM PST by sloop (pfc in the quiet civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
Excellent post,and its even worse than that. Just imagine all the people who will not even run for office due to all the nasty side effects there are.

You are absolutely right. We need to help these guys and have their back all the time not just when they run.

542 posted on 02/21/2010 5:28:00 PM PST by rodguy911 ( Sarah 2012!!! Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

He’s still considered a “new believer” .. even if he’s a Mormon.

- - - - - - -
I’m assuming you mean ‘new believer’ in the political conservative sense not religious.


543 posted on 02/21/2010 5:28:53 PM PST by reaganaut (- "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: dsc

but he has Ron on his show


544 posted on 02/21/2010 5:29:52 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
WOW! It may not seem like a perfect fit now; but we haven't reached this part yet...

should do it gradually, and should seem to be brought to it by the force of circumstances;

BTW, great find! But that's what you do! ;)
545 posted on 02/21/2010 5:29:55 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

“We don’t need “theater & drama” in the Republican party”

We need whatever will rally people to the Constitution, so long as it is not dishonest or deceptive.


546 posted on 02/21/2010 5:29:59 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
Heh, heh.

Glad to oblige.

547 posted on 02/21/2010 5:30:09 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim
I agree with everything Mark said with the exception of Bill Bennett getting something right. Did not read the Bill B piece btw, have no idea what it`s about, just know that I do not listen to Bennett
548 posted on 02/21/2010 5:30:28 PM PST by Friendofgeorge ( SARAH PALIN or BUST.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

LOL


549 posted on 02/21/2010 5:31:10 PM PST by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

I like Beck, but he is a damn plaguerist.


550 posted on 02/21/2010 5:31:11 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

“Now, lately they’ve been doing a good job of NOT playing ball, esp on MengeleCare, but do you really trust them? Do you really think that we can now say, “the Republicans are cured and won’t be abysmally stupid anymore”? No, we can’t say that. Even about the “good” ones.”

I would say not to completely trust them until they prove you otherwise. Sticking to promises, adhering to the conservative planks, etc... would make me tend to trust them moreso, but let’s all agree - they are human. Mistakes and mis-judgements will be made, but were they made deceitfully or to harm? Republicans will always be politicians, so groupthink could tend to steer them wrong as well as political expediency. Look at what is wearing an (R) right now. Deal with them and again separate as much wheat from the chaff as possible. 2010 should be about getting new Republicans in that steer with a conservative wheel (getting rid of McCain would be huge and a shot across the bow). But a third party will always be disaster for our fine Republic, and usher in another foothold for progressive socialism.

When we get lazy, so do they. They are opportunistic animals. When left alone too long they start to soil the cage and chew on the furniture. We have to smack them across the nose once in a while to let them know who is boss.

The Democrats simply believe it to be the other way around. There is a huge difference between them and Republicans and when Glenn goes off in public, the media can and will use it to their advantage. The mainstream media that brought you Obama will use Glenn’s speech to show the unwashed masses that it isn’t a problem with the Democrats, it’s a problem with everyone and the blame is equal. It’s not, and I believe that is what Levine was saying. Then you get a third party spoiler in there and “poof” it’s all over for us for another 4 years.


551 posted on 02/21/2010 5:31:22 PM PST by chichipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
I guess you realize that Palin and Michelle have been guests on Beck's show.

You guys keep expecting 100% from broadcast people and it ain't gonna happen.

None of us are 100%,we all have egos and all the top guys do a different show from the others,that' one of the reasons they are at the top.

552 posted on 02/21/2010 5:31:29 PM PST by rodguy911 ( Sarah 2012!!! Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Beck is stealing Mark’s work as his own, without credit.

Demonstrably so.

553 posted on 02/21/2010 5:32:38 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Perfectly said!


554 posted on 02/21/2010 5:33:30 PM PST by ProudGulfWarVet65 (The question is, it seems to me, is who the most immediate threat is. Sad, huh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: restornu; Persevero
"The Birchers also think the Queen of England runs drugs with Castro or some such bizarreness."

If you were well read, you would know that the founding of the Hong Kong colony was to be a base for the Windsor family's opium and heroin distribution business. There is no reason to believe that the zebra has changed their stripes. The war in Kosovo was largely to keep the drug shipment routes open. There was no legitimate reason for Clark to invade Kosovo.

555 posted on 02/21/2010 5:33:57 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Democracy, the vilest form of government, pits the greed of an angry mob vs. the rights of a man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim; greyfoxx39; reaganaut
Let’s all drink to that

I'll take a vodka soda with a lime! Good going!

556 posted on 02/21/2010 5:34:25 PM PST by Utah Binger (Mount Carmel Utah, Freeper Picnic in Planning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

That was 50-odd years ago. Talk about holding a grudge.

Do you still hate the British for their taxation-without-representation bit when we were the Colonies?


557 posted on 02/21/2010 5:36:10 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth

Jenk


558 posted on 02/21/2010 5:36:52 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Democracy, the vilest form of government, pits the greed of an angry mob vs. the rights of a man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand; restornu
That "gambling problem" was nothing but pure character assassination by the leftist trolls in the media. I'm sorry you fell for it.

You are correct, it was his money and if he wanted to piss it away, it was his business. Only liberals want to control other people's money.

559 posted on 02/21/2010 5:38:45 PM PST by Graybeard58 ("0bama's not just stupid; He’s Jimmy Carter stupid”. - Don Imus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
I saw the anger in Glenn's eyes when Palin refused to denounce and deride the Republican party.....when she said it was the vehicle that needed to reformed and used for conservatives to regain power.

And I also saw him nearly badger her into saying she would go third party.

It's not just 'ego' when what one is pushing will guarantee the Dem control of this nation for the rest of our lifetimes.

Beck isn't even close to being in the same league as Rush or Levin. Hannity, maybe, but not the others.

He's got to get off this kick or he's going to do some serious damgage to conservatism.

560 posted on 02/21/2010 5:39:09 PM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 1,261-1,267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson