Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should cell phone use while driving be banned
http://www.examiner.com/x-33782-Ann-Arbor-Christianity--Culture-Examiner~y2010m2d18-Should-cell-phone-use-while-driving-be-banned ^ | February 18, 2010 | Kevin Fobbs

Posted on 02/19/2010 6:25:03 AM PST by Kfobbs

Traffic safety is typically the reason given by municipal or state legislative leaders when there is a consideration to ban the use of cell phones and texting while driving. The NCS announced in January that it estimates approximately 28 percent of all traffic crashes – or at least 1.6 million crashes each year – are caused by drivers using cell phones and texting.”

Think about that when you or your teenage driver is taking a minute while driving to text or take your attention away from oncoming traffic. It could be...

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cphonedrivingban; nationalsafety; sourcetitlenoturl; statebans; textingaccidents
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: Kfobbs
using cell phones and texting

Awright, which are we talking about here? A recent study exonerated cell phone use from the charge of causing accidents. Texting, however, _requires_ taking your eyes off the road for non-trivial periods. Kinda like saying "brushing your teeth, and jabbing yourself in the eye, is dangerous" - conflating the two is statistically stupid.

61 posted on 02/19/2010 7:26:33 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Pelosi is practically President; the Obama is just her talk show host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sticker

I don’t know how many times where I’ve been in a weaving situation because a cell phone driver was doing 10 or so under the limit; sometimes in the FAST lane. I once saw a man so engrossed that he was doing 40 in a 70. Evidently, the first brain function to go is cognizance of the speedometer.


62 posted on 02/19/2010 7:27:28 AM PST by qwertypie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I'm convinced most accidents are caused by cigarette-smoking Muslim pit bulls with assault rifles.

Actually, them thar pit bulls were using ecigs.
;-)
63 posted on 02/19/2010 7:27:41 AM PST by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

That is an excellent point. I can’t help but shake my head in amazement when I see a family van cruising along the freeway with a television set built in. I both marvel at the advancement of technology and tremble in fear at what could be going on inside the driver’s head. (”Should I increase my distance from that semi in front of me or will Superman be brought down by that hidden kryptonite?”)


64 posted on 02/19/2010 7:32:16 AM PST by SkiKnee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: qwertypie

There is a car I see every morning that I go into the office, the person drives 10-15 mph under the speed limit, if on the two lane(in each direction) part in the left lane and in one of the middle two lanes on the five lane section has their hands at the 10 and 2 positions and is obviously NOT talking on the phone.


65 posted on 02/19/2010 7:35:01 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs

Yes. I’ve been hit twice by irresponsible and distracted drivers.


66 posted on 02/19/2010 7:35:10 AM PST by CajunConservative (Shut Up Mary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs
When did we get so desparate that we have to be on the phone at a drop of the hat. I think cell phones are great ....for emergencies and nothing else....which means you're NOT driving but at the side of the road.

Sick of seeing folks with a phone stuck in their ear.

67 posted on 02/19/2010 7:35:22 AM PST by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sticker

Most accidents are caused by driver stupidity.


68 posted on 02/19/2010 7:38:24 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sticker

One bad example of dangerous driving does not excuse another. “Johnny did it too” never cut it.


69 posted on 02/19/2010 7:38:57 AM PST by qwertypie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Never had anybody swerving at us while using a bluetooth. Although makeup application and breakfast has caused near misses. :-)


70 posted on 02/19/2010 7:39:49 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dmz

There’s a lot of legislation of common sense in traffic laws, pretty much all of them are common sense or formalization of structure. What these laws do is allow police to issue tickets hopefully before the person causes accidents. Because we have a system where cops can’t give tickets just for being a crappy driver, there needs to be a formal charge like failure to control, speeding, or what ever else the crappy driver is doing. The fact is a significant portion of cellphone blabbing drivers present a clear and present danger, and could probably be nailed with existing laws but then it would come down to who’s got the bigger lawyer (depending on the lawyers “failure to control” is either a handy catch all or completely useless). People presenting clear and present danger, especially on publicly owned land like roads, should be legislated against.


71 posted on 02/19/2010 7:40:05 AM PST by discostu (wanted: brick, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

WE HAVE A WINNER


72 posted on 02/19/2010 7:43:28 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DYngbld

I want a phaser set to vaporize on my front bumper.


73 posted on 02/19/2010 7:46:41 AM PST by wordsofearnest (Job 19:25 As for me, I know my Redeemer lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: qwertypie

I wasn’t trying to excuse anything, I was only pointing out that there are people that drive well under the speed limit for reasons other than cell phone use. If you don’t like cell phones don’t use one, but like I said also don’t eat, drink or talk to anyone in your car while you are driving otherwise you are being a hypocrite


74 posted on 02/19/2010 7:47:17 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

One of the reasons I only own sticks is that when I’m driving an automatic (especially on the freeway with cruise control) i find myself slipping into “passenger mode”. Without all the actions and decisions of a stick I have a really hard time keeping the brain on the job.


75 posted on 02/19/2010 7:49:18 AM PST by discostu (wanted: brick, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: sticker

Ah, a Left Lane Safety Monitor!! Does the car have Florida license plates?


76 posted on 02/19/2010 7:49:55 AM PST by Notary Sojac (Mi Tio es infermo, pero la carretera es verde!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs
My opinion is no. Distracted driving is already against the law in every state.

As for texting while driving, that should be considered distracted driving. It's dangerous, and should not be done.

The most distracted drivers I've seen are parents disciplining their children in the back seat. Again, it shouldn't be illegal to have kids in the car, but if you're putting everyone in danger by staying turned around to scold them, that's distracted driving. See how easily that existing law can be applied? No need to pass more.
77 posted on 02/19/2010 7:51:13 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
Tennessee tags, an I Work for TN sticker(state employee) and obama/biden 2008 decal
78 posted on 02/19/2010 7:57:52 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs
No, it should not be banned. Every new technological advantage poses risks. People need to use common sense. If obvious negligence contributes to an accident, we already have laws to deal with that. Laws banning cell phone use will not be obeyed. I seldom use my cell phone when driving, but there have been times when I needed to and could not simply pull over to the side of the road.
79 posted on 02/19/2010 8:03:46 AM PST by sand lake bar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbynack
She slammed into the back of the line of cars next to me and wrecked at least three cars.

A couple of years ago the PM talk show in Austin was discussing cell phones while driving. One gal called in and said there was nothing wrong with that behavior. Just as she was about finished, there were tires squalling and a loud CRASH. She hung up.

80 posted on 02/19/2010 8:10:39 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Hey zero, It is NOT Bush's fault anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson