Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/11/2010 2:20:17 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: The Raven

Not surprised. Green plants (including microscopic plankton in the sea) consider CO2 to be a yum-yum.


2 posted on 02/11/2010 2:21:49 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I forgot the source-—Invester’s Business Daily


3 posted on 02/11/2010 2:21:52 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

ping


4 posted on 02/11/2010 2:26:18 AM PST by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate - West FL22nd - Dockery for Gov. - JD Hayworth - US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

For later read.


5 posted on 02/11/2010 2:27:43 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

So the final nail in the coffin of so called “AGW”.

Now when do the massive lawsuits and criminal indictments for worldwide fraud start landing on fat Al Gore’s desk?

That pompous horse’s behind just cannot get off scott free after pulling a swindle like this.


6 posted on 02/11/2010 2:28:12 AM PST by flash2368
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is not only the enemy of the American people and the capitalism underlying their standard of living, the AGENCY IS THE ENEMY OF ALL PLANT LIFE ON EARTH.

The frauds at the EPA are trying to peddle the monstrous lie that CO2, necessary for all vegetative life, is a pollutant!

My God, that is a scientific fact we learned in elementary school.

We can only hope and pray that Washington DC will be continually battered by vicious weather year-round. The federal employees who work there should be prevented from ever going back to work. These troublemakers, like those at the EPA, are deniers of truth, and of science and would destroy life on the planet if left to their lunacy.

12 posted on 02/11/2010 3:17:30 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority (As Wichita falls so falls Wichita Falls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

Now here’s the problem:

Knorr arrived at that figure by relying solely on measurements and statistical data, including historical records extracted from Antarctic ice. He did not rely, as the CRU did, on badly written computer models with built-in fudge factors to direct the data to a foregone conclusion.

Where’s this guy get off actually using real data? It reminds me of a story my younger brother told me about an economics professor he had.

A student asked the professor if he ever tried to apply his theories. The professor answered “Once, but the results weren’t what was expected so I quit doing it.”


15 posted on 02/11/2010 3:44:32 AM PST by Sapper26 (Political Refugee From the Obamanation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; Desdemona; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

16 posted on 02/11/2010 3:49:38 AM PST by steelyourfaith (FReepers were opposed to Obama even before it was cool to be against Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

Do not allow yourself to use the recent cold weather as the argument against the climate change groups.....it is no better than pointing to a heatwave as evidence of climate change.

The walls are coming down and the data is clearly showing the lies that were disseminated by scientists who allowed their political beliefs to over-ride facts.

Articles like this are great sources of information we can use. Massive amounts of snow in DC is just as rare as a Cat 5 hurricane hitting New Orleans and does not help either side.


17 posted on 02/11/2010 4:35:35 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

HOAX exposed AGAIN.

from the article:

“Another result of this study, reports Anthony Watts at WattsUpWithThat.com, is that emissions from deforestation, caused in large part by the clearing of forest land to grow allegedly planet-saving biofuels, may have been grossly overestimated. This finding agrees with results published in November in the journal Nature Geoscience by a team led by Guido van der Werf from VU University in Amsterdam. It reanalyzed deforestation data and concluded that resulting emissions have been overestimated by a factor of two.

We have tried to help document this growing disparity between observable data and apocalyptic computer models that cannot even predict the past. This post-Climate-gate study provides another nail in the coffin of cap-and-trade and shows why the Environmental Protection Agency should not be allowed to destroy the U.S. economy by absurdly regulating carbon dioxide, the basis for all life on earth, as a pollutant”


18 posted on 02/11/2010 4:55:29 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

i think we should publish all the names of the Global Warming fraud on FR with their emails and all of us should send them a copy of the RICO act and then to the ag in their state.....


25 posted on 02/11/2010 9:42:23 AM PST by gibtx2 (keep up the good work I am out of work but post 20 a month to this out of WF Check)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
A single volcano eruption will spew more 'greenhouse gas' into the atmosphere than mankind has in the entire history of civilization. Yet, these volcano eruptions have no lasting long term effect on the climate. When Mount Penitubo erupted in 1991, the Earth cooled for a few weeks, but it eventually got back to normal.

We can observe what happens when a large amount of greenhouse gas is in the atmosphere. Clouds are made of condensed water vapor, which is a much more potent gas than carbon dioxide. Yet, when it's cloudy out, it isn't particularly warm. If global warming theory was accurate, the clouds should act like a blanket, trapping the rays of the sun close to the surface of the Earth, and causing the Earth to get blistering hot. Yet, just the opposite happens, because the clouds also prevent the sun's rays from getting to the Earth in the first place.

Actual greenhouses aren't warm because of the gasses inside. Greenhouses are warm because they don't allow convection. Think of rolling your car windows up on a hot day. The air in the car gets hot. Roll the windows down, and the air in the car will be just as hot as the air outside. The Earth has plenty of convection. It's called "wind".
29 posted on 02/11/2010 9:59:27 AM PST by Question Liberal Authority ("My...health care plan is a Bolshevik plot... which will destroy America." - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
6 H2O + 6 CO2 ===> (in the presence of sunlight and chlorophyll) C6H12O6 + 6 O2

The basic carbon sequestration reaction, and essential to most life on Earth.

30 posted on 02/11/2010 10:17:35 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
This made me chuckle for it is so self evident
Growing disparity between observable data and apocalyptic computer models,
But the rebuttal would be that computer models are much smarter than data computed by an individual
31 posted on 02/11/2010 10:19:34 AM PST by wmposh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Their is one observation that from fossil fuels emissions that attaches itself to Co2 when absorb in planets and oceans is an adverse pollutant. I heard one scientist say which I do not know if true or not gets into the glaciers and then the weight of it causes it to crack or weakens.
The media will show a huge chunk of ice falling into the ocean to prove global warming. This is to prove the receding of the ice pack. They do not know if this weight could or not be because of fossil fuels or just mother nature Fossil fuels are still a product of earth's decomposition it is it's emissions that are still in question to health and safety
33 posted on 02/11/2010 10:28:14 AM PST by wmposh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

Are there any believers in AGW left on FR?


34 posted on 02/11/2010 10:46:52 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson