Posted on 02/10/2010 6:51:19 PM PST by Engineer_Soldier
To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?
I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.
(Excerpt) Read more at univision.com ...
The only person who looks the fool is you libtard.
But I assure you that it won’t be someone who favors amnesty by any name.”
You are never going to find a candidate, because there is no way to remove 40 million illegal aliens from our country.
When you believe you have found a candidate, tell us, so we can expose him for the fool he is.
That's a BS proposition.
That’s what I want. It’s so hard to find good people to run that are not under the yoke. We have already lost so many people on both sides that would be good because of the stench of politics.
LLS
I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.
.
So dishonest it is.
I’m the chairman of America’s Independent Party, the third-largest party in the country based on voter registrations. Any FReeper who doesn’t know that can learn all about it by going to my homepage. It’s one little click. And on virtually every thread we can count on you to remind folks. Thanks. Now, if you don’t mind, the adults will continue to discuss the next battles in the war to prevent our country from being completely over-run by foreign invaders.
Fair questions to ask. "Humanely" did make it seem as though a Constitution-backed deportation is "in-humane." I hope she mis-spoke or just wanted to clarify that massive Janet Reno/Elias Gonzales-type of incidents wouldn't occur.
Palin ought merely to state that she "defers to the USCON", but exactly what she means needs to be determined.
Libtard? You're just like the libs. When presented with 100% truth that can't be rebutted (because it's an interview rather than a paraphrase), you resort to name-calling.
Someone fixed your lie of a title.
“The American Independent Party is a political party that was a vehicle for the 1968 presidential campaign of Governor of Alabama George C. Wallace,”
WTF???
I agree, it does lend to a little "wiggle" room.
Keep in mind though this is from October 2008, she almost had to throw that in there.
My beef is the OP changing the title of the article and the deliberately misleading "Palin is for amnety"
Here is the title of the thread before the mods changed it:
Palin for Amnesty
Univision | October 26, 2008 | Univision
Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:51:19 PM by Engineer_Soldier
Attacking those who stand for the rule of law and our national sovereignty. Sounds like a typical Republican endeavor these days. Thanks for the warning shot. Not that we needed it mind you.
IBTZ!
“many illegals left of their own accord”
and many are still there.
Engineer_Soldier:”There was zero toleration for terrorism by Saddam; he would feed them into a wood chipper feet first just to hear them scream their life away. I know this from our interpreters who were all Iraqi nationals that lived under the madman. However mad he was, he was their leader and they supported him. That’s why Iraqis, not so-called foreign terrorists, fight us day-and-night to get us out of their land.””
Wow, he really is out there.
A Path to Citizenship is the code for amnesty. Call it amnesty-light if you want, but a “path to citizenship” for anyone who has already broken the law just by BEING here does not deserve any form of amnesty.
It’s funny that somebody, OBVIOUSLY A MOD WITH THE PRIVILEGE TO DO SO, has change the title to the post. C’mon, we are conservatives. Honesty is what sets us apart from the libs and we’ve resorted to their tricks of deception. C’mon, we’re better than that even when the truth hurts our schema of what we’ve thought
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.