Skip to comments.
Interview with Sarah Palin (Palin *NOT* for Amnesty)
Univision ^
| October 26, 2008
| Univision
Posted on 02/10/2010 6:51:19 PM PST by Engineer_Soldier
To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?
I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.
(Excerpt) Read more at univision.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bhocira; bhoillegals; illegals; immigrantlist; immigrants; issues; misleadingtitle; oct2008; operationleper; palin; romney; romneybotsattack; romneybotshere
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 601-620 next last
To: SoCalPol
And there are humane ways to deal with the 11-13 million illegal aliens who are in our country right now, but if theyre not going to follow the rules, they need to get out. One more time: What does that mean? What are these "humane ways"? What rules? If they follow these unspoken "rules," they get to stay, right?
241
posted on
02/10/2010 8:06:44 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Law is too important to be left to the lawyers.)
To: bwc2221
If you were not aware of this interview, you were not following the 2008 election very closely. As some of the FReepers have stated, you obviously missed Palins recent interviews with Rush Limbaugh and Lars Larson, when - not a part of the McCain ticket - was directly asked the question and can out strongly against amnesty (Illegal means just that ... illegal) Its funny how many Palin-bashers havent decided on a candidate. Just saying! From my neck of the woods, that's called flip-flopping. It's wrong when Kerry does it, and it's wrong when we do it. She was for it with McCain, then against it now.
242
posted on
02/10/2010 8:07:08 PM PST
by
Engineer_Soldier
(http://www.rlc.org/ (The Republican Liberty Caucus))
To: Engineer_Soldier
Not even Obama (or Bush, Palin, and McCain) state they are for amnesty. They know this is political death. Instead, they use "path to citizenship" as their euphemism.Well, it's true that "path to citizenship" IS a euphemism for "I'll stall until I get a handle on this political hot potato".
Too bad President George Bush felt it unnecessary to properly and constitutionally address it once and for all on 9/12/2001.
Comment #244 Removed by Moderator
To: reasonisfaith; All
Well .. I’ve heard her say that she’s for LEGAL immigration .. but I’ve never heard one of her speeches make any remarks regarding amnesty. If she had .. I would have already been out of here as far as she’s concerned.
I know McCain wants amnesty .. but to make that conditional on her wanting Amnesty .. I don’t read that in her statement at all. “... a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants ...” does not mean she’s for Amnesty. It means she’s for CITIZENSHIP. But .. I have heard her say, “What is it about ILLEGAL that people don’t understand?”
And .. I don’t give a rip if anybody agrees with me or not .. so don’t bother arguing with me. You can have your opinion .. and I can have mine!
245
posted on
02/10/2010 8:09:10 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Healthcare is not a RIGHT guaranteed by the Constitution)
To: jwalsh07
Cut off benefits and they will leave. Tell them in 6 months the benefits end.
246
posted on
02/10/2010 8:09:16 PM PST
by
Frantzie
(TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
To: freekitty
What I posted is the View of Sarah Palin.
What the Palin basher is trying to push are parts of comments Sarah made when she was the VP candidate.
The head of the ticket is the one whose policy is followed on the campaign trail, thus the remarks.
This is the way campaigns have run from the start.
Sarah is not under the yoke of anyone and can freely state
her views.
247
posted on
02/10/2010 8:09:17 PM PST
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: Engineer_Soldier
I'm sorry, but I'm for the truth no matter who it is. LOL!
Come on, lyings OK, but quit insulting us.
248
posted on
02/10/2010 8:09:25 PM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: Las Vegas Ron; Engineer_Soldier
No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty.
That's tantamount to a woman being a little bit pregnant.
You know, people have got to follow the rules.
That's right! We already have rules that requires foreigners to fill out the appropriate paper work at a U.S. embassy and wait in line as do thousands of others who have done so in some cases for years. Anyone who enters the country illegally must be deported. The current immigration laws do not need to be altered, modified or reformed. Doing so will only reward those who have knowingly and willingly violated our laws.
249
posted on
02/10/2010 8:09:28 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: 1035rep
And which war did you fight in? I was there and saw the news that came from what we did versus what actually happened. So, until you know, don’t comment. It makes you look very, very foolish.
250
posted on
02/10/2010 8:09:43 PM PST
by
Engineer_Soldier
(http://www.rlc.org/ (The Republican Liberty Caucus))
To: Man50D
You can only feel betrayed after she commits allowing them to stay as she has stated. By then it will be too late. Like most of us I'd rather a more definitive definition of "pathway to citizenship" from Palin or any other pol. I'm sick of the parsing regarding what should be an easy call.
To: Engineer_Soldier
Do not alter titles of articles when posting.
Do not post opinion pieces in activism
If you wish to post your opinions, post as a vanity
To: EternalVigilance
You are the Party Chairman for the Alan Keyes Presidential run of 2008 against Palin and McCain, and you will be in the same role for the 2012 race against her, and we aren’t supposed to know that you have a horse in this thread?
253
posted on
02/10/2010 8:11:38 PM PST
by
ansel12
(anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
To: Man50D
254
posted on
02/10/2010 8:12:41 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Law is too important to be left to the lawyers.)
To: Engineer_Soldier
“And which war did you fight in?”
Benidict Arnold was a war veteran too...so was McVeigh...
This only proves you are trolling....to hide behind serving...
TROLL.
255
posted on
02/10/2010 8:12:58 PM PST
by
Crim
To: EternalVigilance
Every time I see you on a thread you seem like your shorts are starched a bit much.
I don’t care what you think. The person you are a paid supporter of leaves you as a non player.
256
posted on
02/10/2010 8:13:31 PM PST
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: tet68
Do you not want any of these people to become citizens?
Ding-ding-ding! We have a winner! Was nobody paying attention to what happened after the last amnesty?
These people chose to enter the country surreptitiously in disregard of our laws. Don't need cattle cars. Just prosecute the criminals who hire them, and cut off social benefits. They'll self-deport. We already have a pathway to citizenship - they are free to return home and apply.
257
posted on
02/10/2010 8:13:33 PM PST
by
CowboyJay
(T(s)EA - Honest money, or bust!)
To: Finalapproach29er
What do you propose we do; just tell 15 million Mexicans to go home?
It won't be necessary to physically remove all illegals. Many will leave voluntarily once they get tired of being hunted down constantly by strictly enforcing existing immigration laws. Oklahoma passed their own strict immigration laws a few years ago and within a short period of time many illegals left of their own accord. The same can happen with federal laws.
258
posted on
02/10/2010 8:13:48 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Crim
From their own words. Have you visited? Nope. So take it from somebody who has and from those (the interpreters that worked for us) who grew up there. Can you comment on those from a state you’ve never been to? It’s even more radically different when opining from half way around the globe.
259
posted on
02/10/2010 8:14:11 PM PST
by
Engineer_Soldier
(http://www.rlc.org/ (The Republican Liberty Caucus))
To: EternalVigilance
Exactly! That would be inhumane by Palin’s standard.
260
posted on
02/10/2010 8:14:47 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 601-620 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson