Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Free Market Fetish
Baltimore Chronicle & Sentinel ^ | February 5, 2010 | Paul Craig Roberts

Posted on 02/06/2010 8:39:19 AM PST by 1rudeboy

Economic theory has been shattered because there is no longer any connection between the profits of American companies and the welfare of Americans. The profits of American companies are derived from the cheap labor in offshored locations and are at the expense of the American work force.

The failure to regulate financial markets has produced enormous losses to all Americans except the super-rich.

Former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan answered that he had placed his trust in a flawed theory when he was called before Congress to explain why he, Goldman Sachs Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and Deputy Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, prevented Brooksley Born, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Corporation, a government regulatory agency, from doing her job of regulating over-the-counter derivatives.

The efficient markets theory is that unregulated markets are efficient and rational. According to this theory in which Greenspan placed his trust, unregulated markets produce the best possible result. Any regulatory interference worsens the outcome.

Greenspan blamed his own bad judgment on a theory. The theory, or Greenspan’s understanding of it, nevertheless still holds sway as Congress has proved impotent to re-regulate the gambling casino that is Wall Street. Clearly, the theory serves powerful interests.

But what is the truth?

The truth is that markets are a social institution. Their efficiency depends on the rules that govern the behavior of people in markets. When free market economists talk about markets deciding this or that, they are reifying a social institution and ascribing to it decision-making power. But, of course, markets do not act or make decisions. People act and make decisions, and markets reflect the decisions and actions of people.The entire debate over regulation is misconstrued. It is not the market, an efficient social institution, which is regulated. What is regulated is the behavior of people in markets.

If you want good results from markets, good regulation of human behavior is a requirement.

The market is like a computer. Garbage in, garbage out.

If people who use markets are not regulated, they issue fraudulent financial instruments. They leverage assets with absurd amounts of debt. They market their instruments with fraudulent investment grade ratings. They deal themselves aces.

Did Greenspan not know this? Was he a victim of a theory or an enabler of greed unleashed by the absence of regulation?

The failure to regulate financial markets has produced enormous losses to all Americans except the super-rich. But the U.S. government is guilty of an even greater failure. Washington has not only permitted but also encouraged the unemployment of its citizens by enabling greed-driven corporations to send American jobs abroad in order to maximize profits for CEOs’ bonuses, shareholders, and Wall Street.

As Ralph Gomory has made clear, economic theory has been shattered because there is no longer any connection between the profits of American companies and the welfare of Americans. The profits of American companies are derived from the cheap labor in offshored locations and are at the expense of the American work force.

This dispossession of American labor has been heralded by offshoring’s pimps in the major universities as "the New Economy."

The "New Economy" is a hoax like most everything else the bought-and-paid-for-media feeds to Americans. There is no new economy. There is an unemployed economy. The headlined unemployment rate is just over 10 per cent. The real unemployment rate, as measured by the current methodology is 17 per cent. The unemployment rate as measured by the methodology of 1980 is 22 per cent.

If jobs offshoring is a benefit to America, as the hired pimps of the transnational corporations claim, why is more than one-fifth of the U.S. work force unemployed? Why does the U.S. have the largest trade deficits in world history? Why is the U.S. dollar losing value over time to other tradable currencies?

Greed, and elected representatives who are toadies to special interests, are decimating the American economy.

Consider President Obama’s budgets for 2010 and 2011. The combined red ink is $2.9 trillion. No one anywhere in the world has this kind of money to lend to Washington. How will these massive deficits, never before experienced on earth, be financed? They can only be financed by the Federal Reserve destroying its own balance sheet by its purchase of toxic financial instruments from the banks thereby providing the banks with cash with which to buy the Treasury’s bonds, or by the Federal Reserve itself purchasing the Treasury’s bonds by creating new money, or by another collapse in equity values that sends investors fleeing into "safe" Treasury bonds.

American power is on the precipice, about to fall. Perhaps it is a good thing. The world will be rid of bullying, of invasions of innocent countries based on blatant lies, of torture and murder of woman and children, of redistribution of income from the poor to the rich.

The criminal record accumulated by the United States makes it the least indispensable country on earth.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: morethorazineplease; paulcraigroberts; spottheloony
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: HiTech RedNeck

Offshoring can make sense if you want 24/7 development with the onshore team working with an offshore team, but not when you replace the entire onshore team with the offshore team.


41 posted on 02/06/2010 11:47:37 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

If you mean that one can trade a service economy for a manufacturing economy and claim it’s a plus, then yes, it is a faulty assumption. But one cannot have a manufacturing economy without a service economy, so I wouldn’t go as far as to claim that providing services is necessarily a subsidiary function of producing goods.


42 posted on 02/06/2010 11:49:44 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

If being for American jobs and American workers is “leftist”, then “conservatives” as thus defined - those who are against American workers, will well and truly vanish from American politics.

The GOP should not. Must not. Be the party, of firing Americans!

That’s just stupid. It’s horrible politics, and it’s bad for America.

AMERICA FIRST.


43 posted on 02/06/2010 11:54:31 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (2012: Repeal it all... All of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
But one cannot have a manufacturing economy without a service economy, so I wouldn’t go as far as to claim that providing services is necessarily a subsidiary function of producing goods.

Common sense. One needs not be an overeducated economist of a union activist to see that.
In the heyday of American excellence, there was a healthy mixture of both. No sane, aware person can argue that a service component of any economy is not necessary.

44 posted on 02/06/2010 12:02:58 PM PST by Publius6961 (He is not America; he is an employee seemingly unable to rise to minimal expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Paul Craig Roberts Assclown
45 posted on 02/06/2010 12:14:42 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

“Another idiot who would like americans to be less productive by keeping disfunctional manufacturing jobs here in the states just so corporations could “employ” people.”

I’m trying to figure out what is wrong with having jobs in this country so that people could be employed.

Isn’t this how most people pay the mortgage and put food on the table? What about you, are you a trust fund baby?


46 posted on 02/06/2010 12:56:41 PM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: webstersII

No problem having jobs, but do we want to keep making buggy whips? Labor intensive jobs have left for two factors. Competitive forces and human labor costs in the final product and a new generation that is averse to working in factories. The American labor force cannot be rigid to one job type. You must improvise and be able to be retrained for alternative jobs.There is no choice in that. Gone are the days when you could walk into the door of the Rambler auto company and expect to work there for 25 years. The names of companies that no longer are could fill a Manhattan phone book.


47 posted on 02/06/2010 1:17:08 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
"If being for American jobs and American workers is “leftist”"-Cringing Negativism Network

"American power is on the precipice, about to fall. Perhaps it is a good thing. The world will be rid of bullying, of invasions of innocent countries based on blatant lies, of torture and murder of woman and children, of redistribution of income from the poor to the rich. The criminal record accumulated by the United States makes it the least indispensable country on earth." - Article

I'm all for American jobs, but when you talk about America like he did in the above paragraph, he has clearly been drinking the lefist coolaid.

48 posted on 02/06/2010 2:10:54 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Apparently.


49 posted on 02/06/2010 2:59:46 PM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

You are so right. We all steal from the poor b/c that’s where the money is.


50 posted on 02/06/2010 3:02:24 PM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
I wonder if PCR is friendly with Alan Grayson. They're both head cases and economists.
51 posted on 02/06/2010 3:06:44 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mase

Maybe they grew up in the same lead paint house?


52 posted on 02/06/2010 3:27:29 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
He needs oxygen.

Economic theory has been shattered because there is no longer any connection between the profits of American companies and the welfare of Americans.

Where are the profits of American companies going if not to the American's that own these companies. He takes nonsensery to new heights.

53 posted on 02/06/2010 5:11:04 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
The purpose of the American economy isn't to employ anyone, but to insure that I can use my productive capacity as I see fit.

Local, state, and Federal governments have worked hard to generate the current level of unemployment. More government meddling is the problem, not the solution.

54 posted on 02/06/2010 5:13:55 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

LOL! Pica twins separated at birth?


55 posted on 02/06/2010 7:31:22 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
American power is on the precipice, about to fall. Perhaps it is a good thing. The world will be rid of bullying, of invasions of innocent countries based on blatant lies, of torture and murder of woman and children, of redistribution of income from the poor to the rich.

The criminal record accumulated by the United States makes it the least indispensable country on earth.
 

Yikes!  Hey Rude, where do you find this stuff--  and he gets paid to for these rants?

56 posted on 02/08/2010 3:58:43 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson