Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius6961

If you mean that one can trade a service economy for a manufacturing economy and claim it’s a plus, then yes, it is a faulty assumption. But one cannot have a manufacturing economy without a service economy, so I wouldn’t go as far as to claim that providing services is necessarily a subsidiary function of producing goods.


42 posted on 02/06/2010 11:49:44 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy
But one cannot have a manufacturing economy without a service economy, so I wouldn’t go as far as to claim that providing services is necessarily a subsidiary function of producing goods.

Common sense. One needs not be an overeducated economist of a union activist to see that.
In the heyday of American excellence, there was a healthy mixture of both. No sane, aware person can argue that a service component of any economy is not necessary.

44 posted on 02/06/2010 12:02:58 PM PST by Publius6961 (He is not America; he is an employee seemingly unable to rise to minimal expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson