Skip to comments.
Palin electrifies crowd in Salina.
http://cjonline.com/news/legislature/2010-02-05/palin_electrifies_salina_crowd ^
| Friday February 5, 2010
| Barbara Hollingsworth
Posted on 02/05/2010 8:10:31 PM PST by Bigtigermike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-290 next last
To: sickoflibs
21
posted on
02/05/2010 8:39:07 PM PST
by
Josh Painter
("We cannot spare this woman. She fights" - David Karki, regarding Sarah Palin)
To: ColdSteelTalon
22
posted on
02/05/2010 8:39:50 PM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: Bigtigermike
23
posted on
02/05/2010 8:40:39 PM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: ColdSteelTalon
Damn the trollpedos...full speed ahead...
24
posted on
02/05/2010 8:40:45 PM PST
by
Crim
To: Bigtigermike
...cutting taxes.
Bravo Ms. Palin.
25
posted on
02/05/2010 8:41:01 PM PST
by
Falconspeed
("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-94))
To: free me
Alaskans own the resource, they need to be compensated. OK, so every state in the union "owns" the natural resources mined/logged/fished on their property, so they need to be compensated, by this logic. How is this a conservative position?
26
posted on
02/05/2010 8:41:15 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Bostonian conservative, atheist prolifer)
To: Josh Painter
The Ron PaulBots hate Conservative Republicans worse than Liberal Democrats.
They are akin to the Liberal Democrats with the anti war
and Michael Moore views
27
posted on
02/05/2010 8:42:26 PM PST
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: Darkwolf377
But there's one thing that's always bugged me about her position on oil—how is making the oil companies send checks to Alaskans “conservative”?
___________________________________________________________
Because the Alaskan Constitution says that the natural resources of Alaskan our the people's of Alaska . She did want the Constitution says and didn’t spend the money on bigger government.
28
posted on
02/05/2010 8:42:33 PM PST
by
factmart
To: Balding_Eagle
29
posted on
02/05/2010 8:42:53 PM PST
by
sickoflibs
( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
To: Britt0n
Palin's views on bailouts appeared to evolve as McCain's vice presidential running mate. In Sept. 2008, she said "taxpayers cannot be looked to as the bailout, as the solution, to the problems on Wall Street." A week later, she said "ultimately what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health care reform that is needed to help shore up ou economy." During the vice presidential debate in October, Palin praised McCain for being "instrumental in bringing folks together" to pass the $700 billion bailout. After that, she said "it is a time of crisis and government did have to step in."
http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Sarah_Palin_Budget_+_Economy.htm
30
posted on
02/05/2010 8:44:42 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Bostonian conservative, atheist prolifer)
To: Josh Painter
She needs to stay away from criticizing bailouts considering McCain and Graham and Republican history setting up the democratic slush fund!
31
posted on
02/05/2010 8:45:29 PM PST
by
sickoflibs
( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
To: Darkwolf377
Not every state has it written into its constitution the way Alaska’s does.
- JP
32
posted on
02/05/2010 8:45:40 PM PST
by
Josh Painter
("We cannot spare this woman. She fights" - David Karki, regarding Sarah Palin)
To: Darkwolf377
No you’re right. Any company that feels like it should be able to drill for oil,gas,etc on state lands for free.
33
posted on
02/05/2010 8:45:42 PM PST
by
free me
(Sarah Palin 2012? You Betcha!)
To: free me
No youre right. Any company that feels like it should be able to drill for oil,gas,etc on state lands for free.Funny, I don't recall saying that.
Bit defensive when someone dares to ask a simple question. Guess I touched a nerve.
34
posted on
02/05/2010 8:47:08 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Bostonian conservative, atheist prolifer)
To: Josh Painter
Not every state has it written into its constitution the way Alaskas does. - JPI'll keep repeating the question until someone actually answers it, instead of going off track--is this a conservative position?
35
posted on
02/05/2010 8:47:56 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Bostonian conservative, atheist prolifer)
To: Darkwolf377
OK, so every state in the union "owns" the natural resources mined/logged/fished on their property, so they need to be compensated, by this logic. How is this a conservative position? Well, in Alaska, the money was given to the citizens each year. IIRC it was something like $1800/per.
36
posted on
02/05/2010 8:48:02 PM PST
by
Judith Anne
(Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
To: Darkwolf377
Alaskan Constitution says that the natural resources of Alaskan our the people’s of Alaska . She did want the Constitution says and didnt spend the money on bigger government.
37
posted on
02/05/2010 8:49:16 PM PST
by
factmart
To: Darkwolf377
and who is your conservative you want to see run for 2012
38
posted on
02/05/2010 8:49:34 PM PST
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: Darkwolf377
No nrve.
Either the state is compensated or not. Which position do you consider conservative?
39
posted on
02/05/2010 8:49:56 PM PST
by
free me
(Sarah Palin 2012? You Betcha!)
To: factmart
Because the Alaskan Constitution says that the natural resources of Alaskan our the people's of Alaska . By this logic, anything is a conservative position because according to the SCOTUS, the Constitution supports it?
I'm asking a very specific question. I'm a little confused why I can't get a straight answer.
She did want the Constitution says and didnt spend the money on bigger government.
That's a strawman argument having nothing to do with my question.
40
posted on
02/05/2010 8:50:10 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Bostonian conservative, atheist prolifer)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-290 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson