Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darkwolf377
But there's one thing that's always bugged me about her position on oil—how is making the oil companies send checks to Alaskans “conservative”?

___________________________________________________________

Because the Alaskan Constitution says that the natural resources of Alaskan our the people's of Alaska . She did want the Constitution says and didn’t spend the money on bigger government.

28 posted on 02/05/2010 8:42:33 PM PST by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: factmart
Because the Alaskan Constitution says that the natural resources of Alaskan our the people's of Alaska .

By this logic, anything is a conservative position because according to the SCOTUS, the Constitution supports it?

I'm asking a very specific question. I'm a little confused why I can't get a straight answer.

She did want the Constitution says and didn’t spend the money on bigger government.

That's a strawman argument having nothing to do with my question.

40 posted on 02/05/2010 8:50:10 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Bostonian conservative, atheist prolifer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson