___________________________________________________________
Because the Alaskan Constitution says that the natural resources of Alaskan our the people's of Alaska . She did want the Constitution says and didn’t spend the money on bigger government.
By this logic, anything is a conservative position because according to the SCOTUS, the Constitution supports it?
I'm asking a very specific question. I'm a little confused why I can't get a straight answer.
She did want the Constitution says and didnt spend the money on bigger government.
That's a strawman argument having nothing to do with my question.