Gee, not one mention of her $100,000 speaking fee, I wonder why?
Ask yourself, would she be doing it for free?
Sarah is all about Sarah. She loves your attention, because next time she can command $150,000.
She’s already stated that she will be donating that money, but thanks for playing.
Sarah has already announced that the fee will go to charity.
Does this soften your opinion?
I came up with yes.
Try reading the article, troll.
“I will not benefit financially from speaking at this event. My only goal is to support the grassroots activists who are fighting for responsible, limited government — and our Constitution. In that spirit, any compensation for my appearance will go right back to the cause.”
Yeah, because capitalism and money are, like, you know, evil. /sarc
Your screen name fits you well.
- JP
Guess what, douchebag? If you kept up you would know she is not keeping any payment for this appearance but rather contributing it all to the teaparty movement. BTW, what have you contributed besides nothing?
that’s because she is giving the money away
and
last time I checked, we still have CAPITALISM (barely)
and
get over it
She is doing it for free.
Why did you choose to ignore her very public statement to this effect?
Sarah took on members of her own party when they were corrupt. She is the real deal.
I do happen to prefer DeMint and Michele Bachmann, but Sarah is a super person, too.
Your beloved Clintons don't take a dump without a fee, son.
Go back to DU where you belong, troll.
“Gee, not one mention of her $100,000 speaking fee, I wonder why?”
“I will not benefit financially from speaking at this event. My only goal is to support the grassroots activists who are fighting for responsible, limited government — and our Constitution. In that spirit, any compensation for my appearance will go right back to the cause.