Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minnesota wind turbines won’t work in cold weather
Hotair ^ | 02/01/2010 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 02/01/2010 7:46:20 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Minnesota invested itself in alternative energy sources years ago, and so the revelation that the state spent $3.3 million on eleven wind turbines hardly qualifies as news. However, the fact that they don’t work in cold weather does. KSTP reports that none of the wind turbines work, prompting the Twin Cities ABC affiliate to dub them “no-spin zones.”

Special hydraulic fluid designed for colder temperatures was used in the turbines, but it’s not working, so neither are the turbines.

There is a plan to heat the fluid, but officials must find a contractor to do the work.

How will the heaters work? They’ll have to use either electricity or natural gas at each turbine to keep the mechanism lubricated. That will drastically reduce the net energy gain from each turbine, depending on how much heating the turbine fluid needs to stop congealing in the winter. Since cold weather here lasts anywhere from 4-6 months, that makes it mighty inefficient as an energy resource.

In this case, though, the state may not be entirely at fault. The manufacturer certified these turbines to work during the harsh winters of Minnesota, and the state took them at their word. KSTP reports that the state may sue the manufacturer for either failure to perform or perhaps misrepresentation, so we could get at least some of our money back. However, the state also could have mitigated the issue by purchasing just one or two and monitoring their performance through a winter before buying the rest.

Wind power makes a lot of sense as a secondary or tertiary power source, a way to harness extra power without necessarily relying on it as a consistent source. I have no problem with its deployment under that kind of strategy, but as this shows, it’s simply not reliable enough as a primary energy resource replacing coal- or natural gas-generated electricity.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; minnesota; windpower; windturbine; winter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: screaminsunshine

We could try, but they usually be a sittin’ on dey fat assets, not much willing to hit the treadmill and give us all some power.


21 posted on 02/01/2010 8:07:00 PM PST by BOBTHENAILER ( EPA will rule your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

LOL. It looks like cold weather has put a damper on the leftys agenda.


22 posted on 02/01/2010 8:07:28 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I have no problem with its deployment under that kind of strategy, but as this shows, it’s simply not reliable enough as a primary energy resource replacing coal- or natural gas-generated electricity.


23 posted on 02/01/2010 8:07:58 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Marsha Coakley's been teabagged. Populists Hugo Chavez and Hussein Obama are next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER

Whips.


24 posted on 02/01/2010 8:10:21 PM PST by screaminsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
...send the mother earth-worshipping greenies out there to hand crank em.

Sorry, they are all busy chanting in their new rock circles at the Air Force Academy.

25 posted on 02/01/2010 8:10:41 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
There is a plan to heat the fluid, but officials must find a contractor to do the work.

And where do we get the energy to head the fluid. Dumb as@es!!!!!!!

26 posted on 02/01/2010 8:12:06 PM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Well you could use the coal plant to power a giant fan that would blow through heaters and power the windmills.


27 posted on 02/01/2010 8:13:52 PM PST by screaminsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
I have no problem with its deployment under that kind of strategy, but as this shows, it’s simply not reliable enough as a primary energy resource replacing coal- or natural gas-generated electricity.

By definition, every KwH of wind or solar-generated power must be backed up by an available KwH of conventionally generated power.

Otherwise, you run the risk of windless or sunless days leaving you powerless.

For those who hope to have a utopian world where only wind and solar energy are employed 100%, be advised you'll require 100% back-up from coal, natural gas or nuclear power plants.

Enviros are so damn foolish...

28 posted on 02/01/2010 8:16:29 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Minnesota was sold a bill of goods. These are crap. Toys. Real utility scale turbines have no problem operating at low temperatures. Bash wind if you want to, but using this story to do it puts you in the crap science league.


29 posted on 02/01/2010 8:20:29 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoadKingSE

wind turbine crippled in high winds. 1980's vintage design.

30 posted on 02/01/2010 8:30:44 PM PST by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

That’s pretty damn funny


31 posted on 02/01/2010 8:32:32 PM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Minnesota broke wind.


32 posted on 02/01/2010 8:42:52 PM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar
The solution is simple, just burn coal at their base to heat them up!

And then we could put this wheel with a bunch of vanes on it in the updraft, and then we could hook it to a generator, and then...

33 posted on 02/01/2010 8:44:02 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wind power costs more and the average will raise the cost of all power.


34 posted on 02/01/2010 8:49:18 PM PST by Big Horn (Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

And you either need to keep that conventional power spun up or you need some r-e-a-l-l-y big capacitators.


35 posted on 02/01/2010 8:50:46 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

Let me get this straight, to save the planet from global warming they built wind mills to generate electricity, but they don’t work because it’s too (wait for it)

cold?????????


36 posted on 02/01/2010 8:56:00 PM PST by PilotDave (Anyone who can get NJ + MA to vote R, can't be all bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
We used to use smudge pots here in Florida to save the Oranges til the EPA stopped it.

An equally ludicrous situation happened to the LA Fire Department. When a fire burned the power lines to their station, the fire department started their backup diesel generators so they could continue to operate. The CA Air Resources Board forced them to shutdown the generators. They were worried about the minuscule pollution of diesel generators as a massive brush fire was raging just a few miles away. The fire department needed that power to support putting out the fire. Idiot leftists.

37 posted on 02/01/2010 8:56:45 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

Uh... capacitors. Capacitators are the guys who install capacitors.


38 posted on 02/01/2010 8:59:18 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

“And then we could put this wheel with a bunch of vanes on it in the updraft, and then we could hook it to a generator, and then...”

Yeppers That’s the ticket! LOL


39 posted on 02/01/2010 9:01:46 PM PST by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Sort of similar to the situation that took out much of the public safety radio system in New Orleans. They’d planned to use propane powered generators to run the repeater sites in the event of a power failure, but the neighbors got all excited about the “fire hazard”. So, they went with natural gas which, of course, was impacted by the flooding and power failure.


40 posted on 02/01/2010 9:05:30 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson