Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John McCain, Evan Bayh team up on spending freeze bill (McCain wants to give 0 a line-item veto)
Politico ^ | 2010-01-26 | Meredith Shiner

Posted on 01/26/2010 12:05:08 PM PST by rabscuttle385

Sens. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) are jumping on the spending freeze bandwagon, calling on Congress to flatline discretionary spending—and they issued a challenge to the president the day after the White House proposed its own three-year budget freeze.

"If the president is serious—and I believe he is—he should also say tomorrow night he will veto the first appropriations bill that comes to his desk that has an earmark on it," McCain said.

The Fiscal Freeze Act of 2010, which Bayh and McCain hope to introduce to the Senate later this week, includes provisions to install a spending freeze and earmark moratorium until the deficit is eliminated, enforce the Congressional budget resolution as binding law and even create a constitutionally viable line-item veto to "give the President power to strike out wasteful earmarks and other extraneous spending items."

Both McCain and Bayh are up for re-election this year.

The senators’ announcement comes after a failed 53-46 roll call vote on creating a statutory deficit commission amendment and in advance of Wednesday's State of the Union address, when Obama plans to announce his spending freeze on non security spending.

When asked about his take on Obama's about-face on spending caps — and the president's accusation when he was a candidate that McCain was out-of-touch for suggesting just such a spending freeze — McCain commended the President's recent actions while gently chiding his rhetoric on the trail.

"I think the president understands now how serious this problem is, that it requires hatchets and scalpels. It requires a hatchet to get the budget under control and it requires a scalpel to eliminate wasteful and unnecessary spending," McCain said. "So I appreciate the fact that the president has changed his position since the campaign."

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bayh; bho44; dnc4mccain; du4mccain; huffpo4mccain; kos4mccain; mcbama; mccain; mccain4obama; mccaintruthfile; mcinsane; mclame; mcstain; obama; obama4mccain; rino; rinomccain; rinos4obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: rabscuttle385

Yes, Juan....let’s just give this Dictator a line-item veto, just when we are about to retake the Senate and/or House, and let’s just give him the power to negate ANY power we might gain from this....jeeessssshhhh....people wonder now why the hell anyone, even a Republican, listens to you any more...go away and fade off into the sunset.. you’ve outlived what good you’ll do in this world.


21 posted on 01/26/2010 12:19:05 PM PST by Gaffer ("Profling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Constitutional or not, Obama is the last president who should be given a line item veto. Just look at how his nitwit attorney general uses his discretion: letting off 100% guilty black panther voter intimidators, Mirandizing a terrorist who was singing like a bird. And they’d use a line item veto just as stupidly.

And I think Juan McCain might be overplaying his hand. The challenge from JD really has the little backstabber fired up, and the voters might not be as impressed with some of his recent maneuvers as he expects.


22 posted on 01/26/2010 12:19:23 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
which Bayh and McCain hope

Lame Duck and Crazed Duck come up with an idea.

23 posted on 01/26/2010 12:21:39 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Are so many FReepers so short sighted and blindly partisan that they are FOR a line item veto when there is a Republican President, but AGAINST a line item veto when there is a Democrat President?

Either you think a line item veto is a good idea or you do not.

Either you think the line item veto is Constitutional, or you disagree.

Such positions should be irrespective of who is currently and temporarily occupying the Oval Office.

24 posted on 01/26/2010 12:22:30 PM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

Where in the constitution does it even MENTION stuffing earmarks into bills after they’ve already been voted LET ALONE saying anything about the constitutionality of banning them?


25 posted on 01/26/2010 12:23:54 PM PST by jyoders19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

LOL


26 posted on 01/26/2010 12:25:27 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
This is one more example of McCain not doing his homework, and making a stupid recommendation as a result. Many presidents have sought the line-item veto.

Congress finally passed it as a law, under Clinton. Clinton used it once. Then the Supreme Court ruled that the line-item veto could only be established by a constitutional amendment.

McCain is only ten years behind the curve on this. Fool that he is.

John / Billybob

27 posted on 01/26/2010 12:27:20 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.TheseAretheTimes.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
(Obama) will only use it to bash conservatives.

If he uses it at all, he can only cut spending, not add stuff. If he only cuts Republican earmarks, (not a bad idea, imo), and not Democrat, he will be branded as a hyperpartisan. Finally, if the line item veto is passed now, it will be in place in 2012, ready for Palin to wield it at will.

28 posted on 01/26/2010 12:30:08 PM PST by sportutegrl (I was for Sarah Palin before being for Sarah was cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Regarding Reagan and his line item veto. I thought most of the Republicans in Congress were for it, but the democrats were freaking out. Unfortunately, Reagan lost one of the two houses of Congress in ‘82 and never had both houses under Republican majority for the rest of his Presidency.


29 posted on 01/26/2010 12:30:23 PM PST by muleskinner ("You know the Germans always make good stuff')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Burkean

Has McCain ever sponsored a bill with a Republican?

Or one that has ever even favored the “republic for which he stands”?


30 posted on 01/26/2010 12:31:11 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

The line item veto is GOOD - we WANT that

All it can ever be used for is cutting spending

Yes a democrap may occasionaly weild it, but thats OK you gotta take the good with the bad


31 posted on 01/26/2010 12:31:11 PM PST by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Why is John always reaching across the aisle? How come the Dems don’t reach across the aisle?

The freeze idea is idiotic. It is meaningless.


32 posted on 01/26/2010 12:32:24 PM PST by RexBeach ("Those are my principles...if you don't like them, I have others." Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jyoders19
This wouldn’t be a line-item veto on anything congress voted on in the original bill. It would just apply to earmarks stuffed in during committee, the culprit in 90% of the wasteful spending in Washington.

Where do you find some legal distinction between the "original bill" and the bill after earmarks were added in committee? The bill with added earmarks and any amendments is still voted on by Congress. It's still a bill approved by Congress and sent to the President for signature.

33 posted on 01/26/2010 12:33:25 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
The freeze idea is idiotic. It is meaningless.

And the freeze idea is also pretty deceitful and hypocrital after Obama has increased most all discretionary spending by amounts greater than any president before: increasing by a big percentage then freezing. Don''t have details, but fairly sure that is that is the case.

34 posted on 01/26/2010 12:37:13 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Once again...


35 posted on 01/26/2010 12:38:54 PM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jyoders19
Where in the constitution does it even MENTION stuffing earmarks into bills after they’ve already been voted LET ALONE saying anything about the constitutionality of banning them?

Where it enumerates powers delegated to the various branches of government. The Executive Branch Head can pick and choose what he likes in a bill that he is signing? I don't think so. The legislature writes the bill, like it or not..

36 posted on 01/26/2010 12:39:21 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Considering the fact that this president is using taxpayer dollars to pay off supporters, I have a lot of trouble believing that he wouldn’t use the line item veto as a weapon against opponents.


37 posted on 01/26/2010 12:40:41 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Its true Obama's spending freeze doesn't affect most of the federal budget. What it does do is it shifts the political argument to shrinking rather than growing the government. That's quite a significant concession from a liberal Democratic President and it will make it that much harder for the Democrats to run on a platform of adding everything to the Christmas Tree - which just collapsed this month of its own weight.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

38 posted on 01/26/2010 12:40:55 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Hey Sarah McPalin, how’s that support of McCain going?


39 posted on 01/26/2010 12:43:02 PM PST by stockpirate (Sarah's McPalin's support of McCain leaves me speechless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl
"If he only cuts Republican earmarks, (not a bad idea, imo), and not Democrat, he will be branded as a hyperpartisan."

I agree. The Independents, who now control some regional and the national election, are finally awake and are watching this administration closely. (See Mass.) They will be critical of partisian shenanigans by this administration.

40 posted on 01/26/2010 12:43:42 PM PST by muleskinner ("You know the Germans always make good stuff')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson