Posted on 01/26/2010 3:02:37 AM PST by mgist
Reagan famously said that Republicans believe everyday is the 4th of July and the Democrats believe everyday is April 15th. An oversimplification to be sure, but that sentiment was not far from the minds of the Massachusetts voters. Already laboring under a bad state imposed health care system, in spectacular fashion, they rejected ObamaCare and elected Scott Brown to a “people’s seat.”
In California, that lesson apparently went unnoticed for California Democrats. Less than 48 hours after the dust settled from the Brown triumph, California Democrats voted for a State imposed “universal” health care plan. In other words, a state run health care system that would bar private insurance.
Keep in mind that California is already amidst a chronic and prolonged budget crisis brought on by runaway spending and exorbitant taxing. Perennially listed among the worst states in our Union to do business, California features 10%+ income taxes and the highest regulatory burden around. So imposing are the costs to business in California, despite its ports and natural resources, Nevada and its desert is #1 in the Country in new business development.
As Congressman Tom McClintock famously says, only government policy could convince people and business to relocate from lush California to the barren deserts of Nevada. The practical result of those anti-job polices is that California now has a revenue problem. Just 3 years ago revenues were in the $125 billion dollar range. Now they are in the $85+ billion dollar range. In other words, government has created a revenue problem by killing off jobs and, without those jobs, there are less taxpayers, less income tax and less sales tax.
Rather than make California job friendly again – and thereby increase government revenues through sales taxes and new income taxes from new jobs – California Democrats offer nothing but tax hikes and even more regulation. And now this.
The estimated cost of the Democrats California Health Care bill is over $210 billion dollars a year! Nearly 250% more than the existing state revenues. But wait – there is more – or less depending on how you think about it. The Democrats don’t even have a funding mechanism in place to pay for their bill. Instead, they want to create a committee (itself costing $1 to $2 million) to come up with a funding mechanism. Of course, that means a government committee to devise a tax scheme to pay for government bureaucracy.
When this bill was considered before, the Democrats claimed that they would raise billions upon billions of dollars thorough new taxes and fees. However, the “non-partisan” Legislative Analyst’s Office, predicted that the new fees and taxes would result in added deficits of over $40 billion per year, i.e. over 40% of the current budget.
In truth, the deficits would be far worse because there is not $200 billion or $100 billion or even $25 billion more to collect from California tax payers. They are already over taxed and over regulated -which is why so many have left the state, or are unemployed, and the government has a revenue problem today.
But don’t tell the Democrats in Sacramento that. They are going to govern us whether we like it or not – at least until November that is and California may have its own 4th of July.
This is BEYOND INSANE!
I hope that the people of California throw the bums out, but the place seems to get flakier by the day. Probably due to conservatives moving out. Don’t blame them.
Most of us that would have voted to “throw the bums out” have already left the state.
Most of us that would have voted to “throw the bums out” have already left the state.
Yep, and the bottom feeding, non-working, free loaders remain.
California will be the first state in the union to go belly up . Then what?
Perhaps the economic destruction of the largest State is exactly what they want. It fits in with OZERO’s seeming plan to proceed with his financial take down of the entire nation.
Chaos is what they want. they will blame it on others and then hold themselves up as the only solution. There just may be enough stupid people in America to buy into this.
California used to be the best place to live, now thanks to the liberals it’s the worst, will they keep reelecting DemRATS into office thinking they can actually solve the problems they keep creating?
We left 20 years ago. Our families still live there, but we won't. I'm a 4th generation Californian but I still had to leave. Not the state I grew up in. So sad. In fact, we left twice. Had to come back because of husband's father. He is a only child. They needed us. After he died we left again.
Just as a point of clarification - Chapter 9 bankruptcy is available to municipalities - subunits of a state government, but not the state government itself. Most of the decisions driving the bus off the cliff are made in Sacramento, but then again some of the local units are trying to defy gravity with untenable pension plans for local law enforcement, fire and other local government employees. I understand that the term “bankruptcy” or “bankrupt” is often being used in a general sense and not as a legal term - but when you look at the legal particulars you realize that since Chapter 9 is not available to the State of California - the likelihood of a federal bailout is significant.
OMG...the poor folks running health care related businesses in CA!!! What do you do? Escape before they build a wall or surrender to the government?
If we could somehow get all the liberals in the country to move to California I think that would solve their revenue problem.
Surely, the governator would veto this bill?
Kali don’t need no stenkin oil, Kali don’t need no stenkin revoonue, they can get funds from Wash. D.C. except the fed/guv don’t no stenkin oil or revenues either.
We try to but the names on the democrat voter list has to many Mexican names on it,we have NO borders in CA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.