Skip to comments.
Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs (why unions are exempted from Cadillac tax)
White House web site ^
| January 15, 2010
| Robert Gibbs
Posted on 01/17/2010 8:31:54 AM PST by reaganaut1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: reaganaut1
MR. GIBBS: We believe the agreement is structured in a way that is fair, just as it is fair to other aspects of the bill that have to be phased in.
No nothing about raising tax is fair, it is socialism, unions are socialist, and in my opinion Obama is socialist and you must be too.
21
posted on
01/17/2010 9:03:31 AM PST
by
ravenwolf
(Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
To: Fido969
Note to self:
Buy more ammo....lot’s more
22
posted on
01/17/2010 9:04:31 AM PST
by
is_is
(VPD of Sgt Dan, Former 2/5 MARINE - "Sleep Well America......Your Marines have your Back")
To: notaliberal
23
posted on
01/17/2010 9:13:47 AM PST
by
paulycy
(The Liberals' DOUBLE-STANDARDS are HATE CRIMES.)
To: bigbob
Gibbs cannot utter a single coherent sentence.By design, of course. He's an automated random phrase generator. Unintelligible. Which is precisely why Obama, Emanuel, and Axelrod keep this jackass doofus around. They have no desire or intent to illuminate anything.
Equally galling is that the press acted as if they were following this wholesale gibberish from Gibbs. They could not have followed it, because there was nothing there to be understood. Just once I'd like someone in the press to to say, "I have no idea what you just said, and neither do you."
24
posted on
01/17/2010 9:18:12 AM PST
by
Eroteme
To: reaganaut1
We're talking about an exceedingly small number of people I think that the premise of your impact would impact. BS. If it affects so few people, why have the tax at all? Or why not give the same deal the unions got to the "exceedingly small" number of people affected?
Gibbs is a lier for Obama and not a very good one.
To: EyeGuy
If you'll allow me: That should be, ". . . a hollow, unaccomplished affirmative action Ivy League strutting peacock . . ."
26
posted on
01/17/2010 9:28:04 AM PST
by
hocndoc
(http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
To: nhwingut
Just so everybody understands: “cadillac plan” = the plan that EVERYBODY in the private (non-government) sector will need in order to get decent health care and avoid long lines once Mengelecare takes effect.
Bend over and grease up - - here comes Ubama.
To: BigBobber
those reporters were talking all over each other...gotta be because it effects them..
To: Lawgvr1955
I think if this passes, a class action suit among all “non-union” employees needs to be enacted pronto.
29
posted on
01/17/2010 9:32:31 AM PST
by
catfish1957
(Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
To: paulycy
30
posted on
01/17/2010 9:34:55 AM PST
by
notaliberal
(Palin supporter)
To: The_Reader_David
[I have a modest proposal: we (the citizenry) form the American Anti-Tax Union. ]
That is actually brilliant. If unions get special treatment, we just all become union.
31
posted on
01/17/2010 9:35:28 AM PST
by
FastCoyote
(I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
To: notaliberal
Well thank you. Use it in good health. :0)
32
posted on
01/17/2010 9:36:57 AM PST
by
paulycy
(The Liberals' DOUBLE-STANDARDS are HATE CRIMES.)
To: hocndoc
LOL!
You probably won’t believe me, but I originally included that in my first draft, but I didn’t want to overwhelm with too many adjectives.
Zero and his white-America hating wife, are THE exemplars of the racist, unjust, affirmative action society we are stuck with today.
33
posted on
01/17/2010 9:38:49 AM PST
by
EyeGuy
To: reaganaut1
Laws by their nature must apply to all. A “law” that applies to only certain members of the population is an invalid law.
To: paulycy
I LOVE IT!!! We gotta send um to Gibbs....sure he deserves to know exactly how creepy his lying has become.
35
posted on
01/17/2010 9:48:19 AM PST
by
Republic
(Get the uhbama's, reid's, pelosi's dirty greedy fingers out of our personal medical care!)
To: reaganaut1
Is it just me, or is there something incredibly creepy and down right filthy not to mention un-democratic and eerily thugish about a group of politicians WHO ARE
framing a NATIONAL HEALTH CARE BILL AND are using AND rewarding SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS THAT have SUPPORTED SAID POLITICIANS IN THE DEMO-RAT PARTY ??Does it GET any SICKER? Or more unfair to the rest of AMERICA?
We have got to throw these immoral DIRTBAGS out of office. ASAP!
36
posted on
01/17/2010 1:09:27 PM PST
by
Republic
(Get the uhbama's, reid's, pelosi's dirty greedy fingers out of our personal medical care!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson