Saturday, January 16, 2010, 8:55 PM
Jim Hoft
Earlier today the Scott Brown Campaign filed a complaint against the Democratic Party for spreading lies that Scott Brown would not allow rape victims to receive treatment. They are giving the Massachusetts Democratic Party until Tuesday morning to renounce the lies against Scott Brown.
The Washington Times posted video from the press conference:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Former Barack Obama supporter Jim Cramer on Friday said the stock market would have a huge rally if Scott Brown defeats Martha Coakley in Tuesdays special senatorial election in Massachusetts.
"I think investors who are nervous about the dictatorship of the Pelosi proletariat will feel at ease, and we could have a gigantic rally off a Coakley loss and a Brown win," said Cramer on Fridays "Mad Money."
"It will be a signal that a more pro-business, less pro-labor government could be in front of us."
The often outspoken CNBCer marvelously declared it a "Pelosi politburo emasculation" (video embedded ... with partial transcript).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Last-Minute Left: Scott Brown Charged With Voting Against 9/11 Rescuers
By Tim Graham
January 17, 2010 - 08:25 ET
A new Nexis scan shows CBS News has still not acknowledged the U.S. Senate race in Massachusetts.
The latest hot charge on the left is that a month after 9/11, Republican Scott Brown voted against paid leave for state workers called to be Red Cross emergency workers. Air America shows the level of discourse: "Brown to 9/11 Workers: Drop Dead."
Liberal blogger Greg Sargent of The Plum Line (a Washington Post Co. employee) brought the story:
On October 17th, 2001, Brown voted agains a bill that would authorize "leaves of absence for certain Red Cross employees participating in Red Cross emergencies." The bill gave 15 days of paid leave each year to state workers called up by the Red Cross to respond to disasters. At the time, state workers called for such emergencies were required to use sick and vacation days.
The bill was initially filed before 9/11, and after the attacks, it was made retroactive to 9/11, covering the time spent by state workers whod assisted with 9/11 recovery work for the Red Cross. Browns vote against the measure came a little more than a month after the attack.
You can read the bill and the roll call right here.
Brown spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom justified the vote by pointing to the states fiscal straits. "At the time, the state was in a fiscal crisis and facing a deficit, and there was no money to spend on additional pay and benefits for state employees," Fehrnstrom emailed.
Think Progress had a citizen-journalist push Brown for comment, and delighted in his answer that "we had to take care of our own priorities first." They then suggested Brown was pushing a tax-subsidized bond for a golf course in his district.
~~~~~
Video - More from rally yesterday
Ed Schultz can eat shit and die.
A great example of how the rat party operates. They actually do this now. Just ask Obummer.
These people; including 'Big Ed' who has now 'gone public' - are scum.
Wonder if he has ever coached 'Little League'. A great message for those who advertise with Ed as well.
Of course the blowhard Schultz would cheat . . . he’s a DemocRAT . . . he’s such a tool
I called Edward's office after I returned home from voting and expressed my shock and displeasure with the system being used. They said she would return my call and explain.....and, I'm still waiting.
The point is, one could have, and maybe did, voted multiple times.
And in Mass. the cheaters have no worry that they will be prosecuted because the DemocRAT party takes care of its own
~~PING!
Note: the 0 will make his attempt to boost Chokely’s chances today:
What: Rally for Martha Coakley
with President Barack Obama
Where: Solomon Court at the Cabot Gym
Northeastern University
400 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02115
When: Sunday, January 17th
Doors open at 1:00 p.m.
http://www.ephblog.com/2010/01/16/obama-to-campaign-for-coakley-75/
Look for a whole bunch of hooligans in attendance.
But, who woulda guessed? There’s an unheard of growing support for Brown FROM SEIU folks..!
http://texasdarlin.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/scottbrownseiumore.jpg?w=500&h=375
Go Scott!
Intentional subversion of democracy is more than enough grounds for civil war.
The totaltarian face of the left is emerging. Hopefully, those attracted by the “compassion” of the left will begin to see the ugly, elitist, anti-demoncratic core of the modern left.
Hey Ed, we know... that’s why its so important that you guys loose power, because the laws of the land mean nothing to you and Democrats.
The Democrats have been courting Ed Schultz to run for senate in North Dakota.
He is the sort of calibur they look for in a public official.
Isn’t encouragement of a crime a crime itself?
That - my friends, is not an "American". That is a "FASCIST" and "TRAITOR" of the worst kind. One who would align themselves with an 'foreign invader' to rule over our citizens. A "Vichy" American. Maybe some day the Democratic party will not be controlled by "RATS", but by 'normal' citizens who disagree, but not at the point of sabotaging our democratic system.
Don't think the Democrats haven't already thought of that.
Well that just about says it all, doesn’t it!
How much cheating will the Dims have to do in order to win?
First, assume turnout is approximately what it was in 2008. That’s a little under 3 million.
Second, assume Brown wins by 2%. Doing the math, the Dims would have to manufacture more than 30,000 votes. To avoid a recount, they have to make it more than 38,000 votes.
But since special elections usually have low turnout, cut those numbers in half, or even in quarters.
I still think the dims will steal this thing. Nothing for the corrupt MA politcal machine to manufacture 100,000-200,000 votes. This election will be Frankened, and it will be tied to a miraculous recovery due to Obama and Clinton.
So what else is new you quivering glob of septic tank sludge?
Stealing elections forever...it's the RAT way.
Wow MSNBC’s announcer is avocating that the people of MA comit a felony by voing more than once. He shoudl be off the air for that!