Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Do Sarah Palin and Jesus Christ Have In Common? (Whose side is Red State on, anyway?)
Red State ^ | 14 Jan 2010 | Erick Erickson

Posted on 01/14/2010 1:16:30 PM PST by GOP_Raider

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: Virginia Ridgerunner

“HOWEVER, if she runs and loses because of Republican skullduggery so that “next-in-line” Mitt Romney is the nominee, then I am finished with the party for good. I will not vote for Mitt under any circumstance, and will either stay home or go 3rd Party if he is the GOP standard bearer. I suspect that I will not be alone.”

You are not alone.


61 posted on 01/14/2010 6:48:36 PM PST by rbmillerjr (It's us against them...the Establishment RINOs vs rank and file...Sarah Palin or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cricket
To say he does not support our Military is just wrong - or worse; criticisms offered that appear embedded in more 'bias' than fact.

Mitt Romney is anti military and always has been, when his father was the antiwar republican candidaate for president in 1967, Mitt himself was avoiding the draft in France, as he described it.
"I was not planning on signing up for the military. It was not my desire to go off and serve in Vietnam..."

For the 2008 election, and people like you, he changed that to.
"I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there and in some ways it was frustrating not to feel like I was there as part of the troops that were fighting in Vietnam." Boston Globe, 6/24/07"

If you want to know what Mitt Romney thinks of the military, then how is this?

"One issue I want to clarify concerns President Clinton’s “don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue” military policy. I believe that the Clinton compromise was a step in the right direction. I am also convinced that it is the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation’s military. That goal will only be reached when preventing discrimination against gays and lesbians is a mainstream concern, which is a goal we share."
Sincerely, W. Mitt Romney (and my five light in the loafers, sons)

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"The good news is, we have a volunteer Army and that's the way we're going to keep it. My sons are adults. They've chosen not to serve in the military in active duty and I respect their decision in that regard. ... And one of the ways my sons are showing support for our nation is helping me get elected because they think I'd be a great president."

62 posted on 01/14/2010 7:02:16 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: cricket
I forgot to mention that no Romney man has ever served the United States in uniform in the entire history of our nation, and they first arrived here to serve Joseph Smith in 1842.

"moot point perhaps; but of course. . .that was supposed to be: ". . .while giving example of strong moral core that 'does not'contradict Christian values; and in no way, insults Christian values."

Being a leader in a religion that is trying to replace Christianity with a new religion contradicts Christian values in my mind, it even insults Christian values.

Mitt's own wife was a Christian before she was personally converted and baptised at age 16 by Governor George Romney (while he was campaigning for President of the United States) while his son Mitt was living in France, she is no longer a Christian, nor or her children. Does that "contradict" or "insult" Christian values?

63 posted on 01/14/2010 7:14:24 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: kenavi; cricket
agree with you, that GW (Bush) walked the walk. Many here judge him unfairly severely.

Particularly if you compare what GW Bush actually did in office compared to say Reagan for example.
64 posted on 01/14/2010 7:39:42 PM PST by JLS (Democrats: People who wont even let you enjoy an unseasonably warm winter day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Go screw yourself, Syncro. You’re a liar and a bully.


65 posted on 01/14/2010 7:48:19 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
You seem to be a very confused person.

No. I just don't want to be a hypocrite.

66 posted on 01/14/2010 8:33:32 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

How does mocking conservative Christians by claiming that they confuse her with the Messiah, keep you from being a hypocrite, it seems to make you something as bad or worse.


67 posted on 01/14/2010 8:47:09 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Oh I think it is pretty well documented what I mentioned about you.

Yes, your clown friends saw me as a bully as they were exposed for their attacks on this website and were sent packing because of them.

Your support for them was quite dedicated.

You believed all their lies.

Pretty scary hateful people, your friends.

You seem to have found a nice niche here, slamming Palin and her supporters.

BTW, you should watch your mouth.

68 posted on 01/14/2010 8:49:44 PM PST by Syncro (TPXIII coming this Spring! March 27th to April 15th 2010, GIANT Rally in DC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Have you actually read any of the Palin threads here? We are hypocrites. We properly ripped Obama worshipers for being the whacko sycophants they are. Then we engage in similar conduct.

Of course Obama is a true threat. Of course, Palin poses no threat at all.

But this does not excuse the conduct of some of her so-called supporters. To restate a familiar but accurate cliche, with friends like some folks, Sarah Palin needs no enemies.


69 posted on 01/14/2010 9:06:01 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I made my mistake. I admitted it. You didn’t accept it. Go jump in the lake.


70 posted on 01/14/2010 9:08:14 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
I've read a lot of Palin threads, and I think you're overstating the case by a lot. More often than not, the hyperbole comes from the small but loud anti-Palin crowd.

Just because we support her doesn't mean we "worship" her. We like what she stands for because it's generally what we stand for.

71 posted on 01/14/2010 9:16:24 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
No you didn't

You made a lying accusation about me on the open forum, and when I called you on it to retract the lie you DID NOT man up and pull it back.

Not only that, you spewed your love for anti-freepers at a Free Republic event to the point I had to tell you to can it.

Stop lying.

And watch your mouth.

72 posted on 01/14/2010 9:18:26 PM PST by Syncro (TPXIII coming this Spring! March 27th to April 15th 2010, GIANT Rally in DC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Have you actually read any of the Palin threads here? We are hypocrites. We properly ripped Obama worshipers for being the whacko sycophants they are. Then we engage in similar conduct.

Have you been reading this thread?

You are full of it, no one is worshiping Palin, and as an anti social conservative who is more comfortable with Giuliani and Mitt Romney, you know that using the language of faith to attack conservatives that back the leading conservative candidate, is a way for you to mock them without actually laying your cards on the table.

You are a dishonest hypocrite.

73 posted on 01/14/2010 9:20:44 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: cricket; Jim Robinson; dcwusmc
Anyway; am not here to cheer for Mitt; only to warn that a too narrow focus may come to bite the Repub Party, big time; and that would be a disaster for America and for a never-ending future to come.

If Myth is the repub nominee then the current _resident will win a second term. And the repubs will ONCE AGAIN PROVE that they are, indeed, THE STUPID PARTY.

Myth is a rooster-sucking* marxist wearing an (R) next to his name instead of an honest (D).

Now, you stated in the quote from you that I posted above, that you are NOT a Myth cheerleader. I'm going to call you a lying sack of crap. I checked out your posting history and almost EVERY recent post shows you're a Myth booster.

So, go back to Myth and tell him "NO SALE". He's the nominee, then he, and the country, LOSE! Period. NO MORE FRACKING RINO's! Myth can ESAD.

*for rooster, read "cock"

74 posted on 01/14/2010 9:30:04 PM PST by Neil E. Wright (An OATH is FOREVER (NRA member) III Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
You made a lying accusation about me on the open forum, and when I called you on it to retract the lie you DID NOT man up and pull it back.

You're half right. I accused you of being a stalker. I really am not sure if you are or not. But you are a harasser and a bully.

Not only that, you spewed your love for anti-freepers at a Free Republic event to the point I had to tell you to can it.

OK. Stop right there. I expressed support for you as a victim of what I felt was an unfair attack from CP. You responded by lying about me and then saying that you didn't wish to discuss it. You're a pathological liar. You only get away with it because you're supported by cowards.

I didn't come after you. You came after me. Stay away from me.

75 posted on 01/14/2010 9:31:53 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
You only get away with it because you're supported by cowards.

That would have to be the moderators.

76 posted on 01/14/2010 9:34:08 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Look at some of the other Palin threads here. You know what I’m talking about.

Look. I’ve seen her on TV, She’s a nice person. Folks here need to let her be a commentator, make money, and have a good life. I don’t think she wants to be president.


77 posted on 01/14/2010 9:38:25 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
That would have to be the moderators.

No. Not at all. That never crossed my mind. Sorry.

78 posted on 01/14/2010 9:41:57 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Look at some of the other Palin threads here. You know what I’m talking about.

God, you are willfully thick, I think you are full of it, of course I don't know what you are talking about, haven't you even read this thread, or my posts?

Your anti Palin, anti conservative, anti social conservative trolling is tiresome and weak, you are soft on conservatism and strong on Giuliani an Romney, why is that?

79 posted on 01/14/2010 9:53:16 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
No. Not at all. That never crossed my mind. Sorry.

It had to cross your mind, they are the only ones that you could mean. Only moderators could make your claim that you made to that other poster possible.
"You only get away with it because you're supported by cowards."

80 posted on 01/14/2010 9:56:59 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson