I'm shocked!!!
Posted on 01/14/2010 1:08:26 PM PST by Brett66
PRESS RELEASE Date Released: Thursday, January 14, 2010 Source: KUSI-TV
Climate researchers have discovered that NASA researchers improperly manipulated data in order to claim 2005 as "THE WARMEST YEAR ON RECORD." KUSI-TV meteorologist, Weather Channel founder, and iconic weatherman John Coleman will present these findings in a one-hour special airing on KUSI-TV on Jan.14 at 9 p.m. A related report will be made available on the Internet at 6 p.m. EST on January 14th at www.kusi.com.
In a new report, computer expert E. Michael Smith and Certified Consulting Meteorologist Joseph D'Aleo discovered extensive manipulation of the temperature data by the U.S. Government's two primary climate centers: the National Climate Data Center (NCDC) in Ashville, North Carolina and the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) at Columbia University in New York City. Smith and D'Aleo accuse these centers of manipulating temperature data to give the appearance of warmer temperatures than actually occurred by trimming the number and location of weather observation stations. The report is available online at http://icecap.us/images/uploads/NOAAroleinclimategate.pdf
(Excerpt) Read more at spaceref.com ...
I'm shocked!!!
HOW did NASA get politicized?
Al Gore's playmate there? Hensen?
bookmark.
D’oh!
What were these people thinking?!
Take James Hansen out for Tar and Feathers.
nasa got political. Screw ‘em. Close ‘em down. We are just about done in space, in any substantive way, for the foreseeable future anyway.
NASA wants the $$$$$$$—they go with the flow
Forget integrity
That would be James Hansen, Al Gore's butt buddy. This will be the 3rd time he has been caught fudging the numbers.
Shame on NASA for riding the junk science band wagon.
Was the increase in funding worth this incredible hit to NASA’s credibility as a science organization?
How did any science get political? Ask yourself this... how many climatologists would get funding if “climate change” didn’t exist? And if the government didn’t fund them, we’d all die from “climate change”... so it’s a perpetual motion machine of self-preservation perpetrated on an initial lie, and if any portion of the circle is broken the whole thing collapses on itself. Thus, the secret shall be guarded heavily.
Believe me , there is a lot of “Political Correctness” in NASA!And not just AWG.
AWG should have been AGW
Beam Gore to PlanetGore - one ticket!
Your kidding, right?
For Politicization of NASA see Politicization of Science.
Here’s a better idea, toss out the political hacks masquerading as scientists like Hensen and refocus the entire agency on its original mission, space exploration. That probably means closing the Goddard Institute for Space Studies since their main focus is gorebull warming. NASA was once one of the very few productive government agencies and is largely responsible for making today’s technology possible, and if we trimmed and refocused the agency we could make it productive again. I don’t expect that to happen unless conservatives sweep the House, Senate, and Presidency.
BTTT
Heh, Heh - you used ‘butt’ and ‘fudge’ in the same post!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
