Posted on 01/13/2010 7:22:15 PM PST by NormsRevenge
Barack Obama came to town a year ago to change the way politics worked, and Organizing for America was to be his instrument. The successor to his campaign organization, with the largest e-mail list in America, was poised many observers thought at the time to bring the campaigns movement fervor and Web-centric tactics to pushing Obamas legislative agenda through Congress.
A year later, politics is working pretty much as it always did, and its Organizing for America thats on defense.
With little public profile and a difficulty in pointing to concrete accomplishments, OFA, as its known, has faced criticism on many fronts: Progressives blast OFA as a soulless, top-down machine thats alienating the base, even as some state party officials complain that the group is stepping on their toes. Conservative Democrats, too, grumbled over the summer when OFA ran mild, campaign-style ads in their districts backing health care reform, a violation of political etiquette the group hasnt repeated after complaints from congressional leadership.
Perhaps most troubling for the party, former Obama aides and other Democrats say, OFA simply hasnt been as effective as they had hoped. And as 2010 shapes up to be a difficult year for Democrats, the quiet hand-wringing among party officials over the organizations capacities has been matched by a new public hand-wringing among Democratic activists, ..
'Fixing health care' was a tough initial assignment for Organizing for America. It was both too diffuse and abstract, said Simon Rosenberg, president of the Democratic think tank NDN, who said he thought OFA could get back on track next year by focusing on the economy and the elections.
...
Top officials would speak to POLITICO only on the condition that the press office approved quotes before they could be used on the record.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...

U.S. President Barack Obama leaves after giving a statement about the
devastation caused by an earthquake in Haiti, at the White House in
Washington January 13, 2010. REUTERS/Jim Young
I always knew he was a Marxist and why he was covering up what kind of “hope-n-change” he really wanted.
I read the caption but who’s that guy in the picture?
It almost seems as though his face is morphing into Jimmy Dhimmi Carter before our eyes...
Cheers!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.