Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Democrats Want To Modify Filibuster Rules [Translation: Dems Want One-Party Rule]
LATimes ^ | January 09th 2010 | Janet Hook

Posted on 01/09/2010 8:42:57 PM PST by Steelfish

Some Democrats Want To Modify Filibuster Rules With Republicans using endless speeches to block all manner of legislation, and the prospect of fewer Democrats after midterm elections, some say it's time for a change so the majority can govern.

By Janet Hook January 9, 2010

Reporting from Washington - The Senate filibuster has emerged as the bane of President Obama's legislative agenda, igniting anger among liberals over a tactic that is now hogtying Congress even on uncontroversial bills.

The threat of filibusters has become so common that congressional leaders take it for granted that any bill of consequence will not pass the 100-member Senate with a simple majority of 51. Instead, 60 votes -- the number needed to cut off the interminable speeches of a filibuster -- has become the minimum required.

Frustration has intensified in the wake of Senate Republicans' no-holds-barred effort to block the healthcare bill, which forced Democrats to scrounge for 60 votes at every legislative turn to prevent a filibuster.

Now, facing the prospect of losing seats in this fall's midterm elections, some Democrats are seeking to change the rules.

While Democrats have large majorities in the House and Senate, the 60-vote threshold for action in the Senate has become a powerful curb on the scope of the Obama agenda. To prevail over united Republicans, all 58 Democrats, including a small but influential faction of conservatives, have to stick together, along with the Senate's two independents.

The Democrats' vulnerability will be even greater given the announcements of Sens. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) and Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.) that they will not run for reelection this year.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2010; 2010midterms; congress; cwii; democratcorruption; democrats; donttreadonme; filibuster; liberalfascism; military; obama; pitchforksandtorches; politics; reid; revwar2; texas; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: Steelfish

Funny, every time you see a liberal lament about the filibuster, they fail to acknowledge that it is Democrats holding up Obama’s agenda. Most outright blame it on Republicans.


61 posted on 01/11/2010 9:16:17 AM PST by IamConservative (Liberty is all a good man needs to succeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
Secede and start over a new. Stacking the deck makes no difference.

You're right. There are too many leftist socialist liberals dragging this nation down.

I'm afraid that even once-solid conservative states, such as Texas, are going to eventually be pulled down from within.

62 posted on 01/11/2010 10:51:52 AM PST by Aroostook25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson