Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A big dilemma for Obama (re: Bush threatened to nuke Mecca)
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | January 07, 2005 | WorldNetDaily.com

Posted on 01/06/2010 6:56:46 PM PST by indpndtguy

Why hasn't Osama bin Laden's terror network executed an attack on U.S. soil since 9-11?

Simple, says Dr. Jack Wheeler, creator of an acclaimed intelligence website dubbed "the oasis for rational conservatives": The U.S. has threatened to nuke the Muslim holy city of Mecca should the terror leader strike America again.

On his website, To the Point, Wheeler explains how the Bush administration has identified the potential of wiping Mecca off the map as bin Laden's ultimate point of vulnerability – the Damoclean Sword hanging over his head.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bs; jackwheeler; mecca; wheeler; whirlednutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
It was said that Bush sent a secret letter to OBL about the threat of nuking Mecca. It's quite simple to conclude that Bush would have warned the Saudi gov like 24 hrs before nuking Mecca (eg. the big black square thing that muslims walk around there), and be prepared to take the consequences of not getting more oil from Saudi by perhaps asking people in the US to conserve, or buy more oil from Canada.

Here is a Real and somewhat theoretical question. Suppose, a terrorist attack (bigger than 9/11) happened in the US during Obama's term, and within days it was determined that al-Qaeda or some kind of radical islamic group was responsible for the attack.

Since these terrorists are basically "stateless", that is they could be in Somalia, Yemen, etc., it is then difficult to exact the revenge on a particular country, therefore the Only logical solution is to attack their ideology or religion, which is to attack Mecca, as per Bush's threat!

The question is: will Obama do it? If not, then what kind of solutions do you think he would take?

1 posted on 01/06/2010 6:56:47 PM PST by indpndtguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

“The question is: will Obama do it? If not, then what kind of solutions do you think he would take?”

The miserable little puke will apologize profusely.


2 posted on 01/06/2010 6:59:05 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

Obama would never do it, and I seriously doubt if GWB would have done it, either.


3 posted on 01/06/2010 6:59:18 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

He would talk.. and do nothing.


4 posted on 01/06/2010 6:59:53 PM PST by Mmogamer (<This space for lease>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

Yes! Excellent. And, no, Obama would not do it.

And they know it.


5 posted on 01/06/2010 7:00:16 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

He’d surrender.


6 posted on 01/06/2010 7:00:18 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Join the TEA Party Rebellion!! May God and TEA save the Republic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

Obama will not nuke anything in the land of his king.


7 posted on 01/06/2010 7:01:23 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

I hope Jack Wheeler is correct and I hope President Bush told Bin Laden and the Saudis just that.


8 posted on 01/06/2010 7:03:30 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

It doesn’t matter what you think, it only matters what Bin Laden thought.


9 posted on 01/06/2010 7:04:44 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, islam will cover the earth with darkness for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

No way would Obama destroy the most important symbol of his religion. Vote me in and I will blow the living hell out of it and remove the Dome of the Rock while I am at it, so Israel can start their new temple.


10 posted on 01/06/2010 7:05:12 PM PST by fish hawk (It's sad that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom. Isaac Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

I’ll need a lot more proof that Bush ever made such a threat to take this seriously. I can’t believe that if he had Bin Ladin wouldn’t have used it as a propaganda bonanza. Doesn’t pass the smell test.


11 posted on 01/06/2010 7:07:01 PM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

Islam only understands strength through intimidation, any attempts of “peace” only turns their bloodlust up another notch.

Mecca will have to become the Middle East Hiroshima, break the will to fight by overwhelming force.

Surgical strikes does nothing, its the same as taking a magnifying glass to ants around an anthill.


12 posted on 01/06/2010 7:10:38 PM PST by Eye of Unk (Phobos, kerdos, and doxa, said the Time Traveler. “Fear, self-interest, and honor.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I agree with you Jim.


13 posted on 01/06/2010 7:12:43 PM PST by b4its2late (Before you can control a horse, you have to break it. Sound familiar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
It would never work - Islam is built on the concept of martyrdom; taking out Mecca would only appeal to their innate beleifs and enflame them.

Better to mow them down in combat; give them repeated object lessons that they cannot defeat us militarily, and continue to interdict their terror ops as often as possible. Devote more resources to the intel fight. Demoralize them through their own repeated failures.

14 posted on 01/06/2010 7:19:35 PM PST by AzSteven ("War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." Jean Dutourd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AzSteven
It would never work - Islam is built on the concept of martyrdom; taking out Mecca would only appeal to their innate beleifs and enflame them.

There is no such thing as an innate belief.
15 posted on 01/06/2010 7:21:13 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

If given an opportunity to meet OBL face to face Øbama would probably bow down and lick the dust.


16 posted on 01/06/2010 7:22:06 PM PST by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy
I'm calling BS. For one thing, they are all about martyrdom. Ahmanutjob even once said sacrificing Tehran to a US retaliation strike for nuking Israel would be worth it. I don't think any threat will be effective. Obama? he'd more likely apologize for whatever we did to deserve the attack.
17 posted on 01/06/2010 7:26:33 PM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

You’re right; Obama is all talk. I caught part of the White House press briefing. I was really impressed with Jake Tapper of ABC. He asked Baghdad Bob Gibbs what Obama planned to do about Iran now that his end of the year deadline has passed and no progress has been made. Gibbs hemmed and hawed about “working with our international partners” etc. Pure BS. Obama needs to “nut up or shut up” about Iran. I’m sure he will prove himself to be a nutless wonder that only knows how to talk. Hopefully talk radio will pick up the baton and draw attention to the fact Obama’s deadline has passed. I’m sure he prefers everyone forgets the “deadline” he set because Iran wasn’t impressed with his charm like his narcissistic personality thought they would be.


18 posted on 01/06/2010 7:34:20 PM PST by Conservative Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

‘It was said’

By who?


19 posted on 01/06/2010 7:35:12 PM PST by Freddd (CNN is not credible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

What an utterly stupid assertion. GWB never threatened Mecca with anything much less nukes. He could have threatened to use nukes on Bora Bora but doubt he would have done that either as that is using a shotgun to kill a fly.


20 posted on 01/06/2010 7:56:49 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson