Posted on 12/31/2009 9:56:13 AM PST by Michael van der Galien
Way to go Nelson......Burn thru that campaign money !
Then the DNC will have to give you more (maybe) in a losing effort.
Loud: not stupid, Obama and his ilk are simply gambling. They think that as long as they push this through, they may lose the elections of 2010 and perhaps even those of 2012, but in the long run, they’ll run because socialized medicine will, they believe, inevitably result in America becoming a social democracy.
and check out this guy, Scott Brown...he could be the 41st Republican Senator and BLOCK healthcare, if he is elected in the special election Jan 19th in Massachusetts for Kennedy’s seat..maybe THAT’S why the big rush to push this Healthcare thru!
http://www.redinvadesblue.com/Moneybomb/Donate.html
Can Nebraska recall a senator?
You see it.
Let's take all these suckers down, down, down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not that it will make any difference.
“Can Nebraska recall a senator?”
I don’t see why not
He’s probably been promised an Ambassador appointment.
Bump for later reading
Socialized medicine, given time, and a huge influx of illegals given U.S. citizenship ... will become a third rail issue, not unlike social security. No politician will dare touch it ...
As I understand it, not many states have provision for recall of Senators. I’m don’t know about Nebraska.
It sure would be sweet though.
0bama and his minders and fellow travelers are doing this because they have no fear of electoral outcomes next year or in 2012. Why fear what you plan to eliminate?
Send a copy of this article (a paper copy, or a link) to Rep. Bart Stupak, Rep. Joseph Cao, and the Potential Flip Vote of your choice. If the vote on the final (post-reconciliation bill) goes exactly as it did last time in the House, but with just three people flipping from YES to NO, THIS BILL WILL FAIL.
Bart Stupak Contact Information
Again: there were 42 members of the House who voted both in favor of the Stupak amendment to bar taxpayer funding for abortions and in favor of the main bill. Clearly, Speaker Nancy Pelosi couldn't have won passage of health care legislation had the House not adopted pro-life language.
The names below are all of those who voted in favor of both measures, with an asterik next to those who were considered undecided on the morning of the vote. To be clear, many of these members would have supported the health care bill no matter what. However, given the 220-215 vote margin on the House vote, what it means is that when the pro-life language is stripped from the bill during negotiations with the Senate, if Pelosi loses the support of any three of these people below as a result -- without picking up anybody else's support -- the bill cannot pass the House.
Joe Baca
Marion Berry*
Sanford Bishop
Dennis Cardoza*
Chris Carney*
Jim Cooper*
Jim Costa*
Joseph Cao*
Jerry Costello
Henry Cuellar*
Kathy Dahlkemper
Joe Donnelly*
Mike Doyle
Steve Driehaus*
Brad Ellsworth*
Bob Etheridge*
Baron Hill
Paul Kanjorski*
Marcy Kaptur*
Dale Kildee
Jim Langevin
Daniel Lipinski
Stephen Lynch
Michael Michaud*
Alan Mollohan
John Murtha
Richard Neal
James Oberstar
David Obey
Solomon Ortiz
Tom Perriello*
Earl Pomeroy
Nick Rahall
Silvestre Reyes
Ciro Rodriguez*
Tim Ryan
John Salazar
Vic Synder
Zack Space*
John Spratt
Bart Stupak*
Charles Wilson
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.