Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cattlemen challenge EPA greenhouse gas ruling in court
Farm and Dairy ^ | 12-24-2009 | by Other News

Posted on 12/25/2009 12:21:39 PM PST by SCalGal

WASHINGTON — The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association filed a petition Dec. 23 in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the Environmental Protection Agency’s recent greenhouse gas (GHG) “endangerment finding” rule.

The endangerment finding does not in and of itself regulate greenhouse gases, but it is a step in the process for GHG regulation under the Clean Air Act.

The rule provides the foundation for EPA for the first time to regulate GHGs from small and large sources throughout the economy, including farms, hospitals, office buildings and schools.

Not science-based

The cattlemen’s association claims EPA’s finding is not based on scientific analysis, “yet it would trigger a cascade of future greenhouse gas regulations with sweeping impacts across the entire U.S. economy,” said Tamara Thies, chief environmental counsel.

“Why the administration decided to move forward on this type of rule when there’s so much uncertainty surrounding humans’ contribution to climate change is perplexing.”

The farm group claims because of this rule, for example, EPA will be able to tell farmers that they can only emit a certain level of GHGs; if they go over that amount, they can incur penalties and be forced to curtail production.

The rule also sets the stage for citizen suits.

“EPA has decided to trump Congress and mandate greenhouse gas regulation under the Clean Air Act,” said Thies. “The act is ill-equipped to address climate change, and Congress never intended for it to be used for that purpose.”

Under the rule, EPA defined air pollution to include six greenhouse gases, and stated that manmade greenhouse gases endanger public health and the environment.

Asking court to overturn

The petition NCBA filed, as part of a coalition of interested parties, is the first step in asking the DC Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn EPA’s rule due to a lack of sound or adequate basis for making the finding of endangerment from anthropogenic GHGs.

EPA estimates

According to the EPA, in 2007, GHG emissions from the entire U.S. agriculture sector represented less than 6 percent of total U.S. GHG emissions, and the livestock industry emitted only 2.8 percent.

At the same time, land use, land use change, and forestry activities resulted in a net carbon sequestration of approximately 17.4 percent of total U.S. carbon dioxide emissions, or 14.9 percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: epa; greenhousegas

1 posted on 12/25/2009 12:21:40 PM PST by SCalGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SCalGal
Breathing and farting...That's called recycling!! My trees and grass suck up what I exhale. That clover and wheat and corn....suck up cow farts.

How stupid are these people??

2 posted on 12/25/2009 12:26:54 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SCalGal

CO2 is plant food.
Simple.


3 posted on 12/25/2009 12:30:05 PM PST by ctdonath2 (It from fit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SCalGal; proud_yank; bamahead; Normandy; SteamShovel; SolitaryMan; rdl6989; Darnright; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

4 posted on 12/25/2009 12:30:44 PM PST by steelyourfaith (Don't start the revolution without me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
CO2 is plant food. Simple.

Only simple to those of us with some common sense.

5 posted on 12/25/2009 12:31:23 PM PST by SCalGal (Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$ or PETA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
How stupid are these people??

Their rank-and-file is, indeed, stupid.

But their leaders are anything but stupid. They know full well they are promoting a lie. But the lie serves them in their pursuit of power.

At this stage, there are only three possible reasons for believing in "Man-caused Climate Change":

1. Ignorance...because you rely solely on the MSM and, thus, have never been exposed to the scandal known as "Climategate".

2. Stupidity...because your pea-brain can't comprehend the meaning of "Climategate".

3. You're in on the scam...and deny the reality of "Climategate".

6 posted on 12/25/2009 12:33:08 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie01
But their leaders are anything but stupid. They know full well they are promoting a lie. But the lie serves them in their pursuit of power.

A stupid, sick, hungry populace is easier to control.

This is part of "hungry".

7 posted on 12/25/2009 12:35:36 PM PST by SCalGal (Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$ or PETA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SCalGal

IMHO, the Congress is putting out ten times the GHGs as all of the cattle in the world combined.


8 posted on 12/25/2009 12:43:11 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Remember in November! Throw all of the bums out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SCalGal
Under the rule, EPA defined air pollution to include six greenhouse gases, and stated that manmade greenhouse gases endanger public health and the environment.

Yes, but man is part of nature and is, therefore, natural. Because of this, anything that man does is also natural. His activities that produce greenhouse gases are just as natural as those of termites or volcanos or oceans that release CO2 when heated up by an increase in solar activity or outgassing methane from the earth's crust that oxidizes into CO2. Since the amount of CO2 produced by man is miniscule compared to that produced by all the rest of nature, isn't targeting man's activities on this account actually just a way of targeting man and aiming to destroy his own unique niche in the environment?
9 posted on 12/25/2009 12:44:32 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Man’s CO2 based contribution to the greenhouse effect is 0.117%.

AGW is a hoax and a lie, with the intent of controlling people. Simple as that.


10 posted on 12/25/2009 12:52:28 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
"How stupid are these people??"

Not stupid - just pure evil and manipulative liars.

11 posted on 12/25/2009 12:54:21 PM PST by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SCalGal

Stop supplying any beef products to the canteens of both the House and the Senate - now! Let them eat broccoli.

While you’re at it, cut off their electricity and let them set up solar panels and windmills.


12 posted on 12/25/2009 12:59:43 PM PST by Moltke (DOPE will get you 4 to 8 in the Big House - HOPE will get you 4 to 8 in the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moltke

“Let them eat broccoli.”
That’ll really get them farting.


13 posted on 12/25/2009 1:03:04 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SCalGal
I want the nuclear arsenal reduced!

Detonate the first one in Washing DC!!!!

14 posted on 12/25/2009 1:07:44 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“Breathing and farting...That’s called recycling!! My trees and grass suck up what I exhale. That clover and wheat and corn....suck up cow farts. How stupid are these people??”

Peta members do not realize that being a vegetarian or vegan is not for everybody. They just want to force their agenda on everybody. Stupid, very stupid IMHO.


15 posted on 12/25/2009 1:33:59 PM PST by tob2 (I would rather have a nuclear power plant in my backyard than Gitmo detainees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SCalGal
Then, perhaps farmers should earn carbon credits.
16 posted on 12/25/2009 1:34:41 PM PST by Qout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

Sniff, sniff. Ewwwwww! lol


17 posted on 12/25/2009 1:35:59 PM PST by tob2 (I would rather have a nuclear power plant in my backyard than Gitmo detainees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Qout

“Then, perhaps farmers should earn carbon credits.”

They already do.


18 posted on 12/25/2009 1:41:29 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (The End of an Error - 01/20/2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
How stupid are these people??

They are not stupid at all. This is how we are "regulated."

If a Federal Pencil Agency was belched out of congress tomorrow, charged with ensuring pencil erasers are effective and the sharpened ends are the correct angle, it would not be long before length, girth, color, make up of the metal band, right-handed vs left-handed user, number of cranks of a sharpener, which pocket it is stowed in and more would all come under "regulation."

The EPA does not need to be contained ... it needs to be done away with.

19 posted on 12/25/2009 6:22:14 PM PST by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson