The whole argument hinges on this tidbit right here. And as far as I know, it is false. We have not seen the long-form birth certificate and so we cannot say if Obama was, or was not born in Hawaii.
The question being asked ("Is he a natural born citizen?") is a perfectly legitimate question. Obama has spent over $1M to avoid answering it.
The author is arguing here that Hawaii had no “long-form” birth certificate in 1961.
How do we know that a million dollars (or some large amount of money) has been spent to cover up Obama’s birth circumstances?
Also the Hawaii Health Department has never confirmed the Colb that’s online.
The President released his birth certificate (which was verified by the Hawaii Health Department) yet conspiracy theorists refuse to see logic.
The whole argument hinges on this tidbit right here. And as far as I know, it is false. We have not seen the long-form birth certificate and so we cannot say if Obama was, or was not born in Hawaii.
The question being asked (”Is he a natural born citizen?”) is a perfectly legitimate question. Obama has spent over $1M to avoid answering it.
****************************************************
Not only that, but, to the best of my knowledge, no Hawaiian agency has ever said that the digital image of the COLB that was posted online matches what they have on file. Not ever.
“The President released his birth certificate (which was verified by the Hawaii Health Department)”
Not to mention, he never did and they never have.
The state of Hawaii says he was born in Hawaii.