Posted on 12/21/2009 9:56:56 AM PST by AreaMan
James Cameron's "Avatar" is the most amazing ... no, wait: the most staggeringly amazing, jaw-droppingly triple-awesome unbelievable movie ever made. That's the feeling among the reviewers aggregated at Rotten Tomatoes, anyway. I quote:
"An overwhelming feast of visual artistry unlike anything you have ever seen before."
"Much more than a film. It's a prescribed cinematic experience."
"An entertainment to be not just seen but absorbed on a molecular level."
"Cameron has achieved no less than a rebirth of cinema."
"Make sure you can say you were there when the future of cinema began."
What, are we all techno-fanboys now? Or just unpaid studio publicists? "Avatar" without question represents a new high point in motion-capture technology — the digital technique whereby the movements of human actors are used as the armature for animating fanciful characters. (Peter Jackson's Gollum in "Lord of the Rings" was the breakthrough in this area.) And the movie offers deep 3-D panoramas of computer-generated imagery that really are stunning. (For the first two hours, anyway — at which point there are still 40-some minutes left to go.)
But all of this expensive tech has been put at the service of a story so triflingly generic, you wonder why anyone would bother to tell it. Briefly: Paraplegic ex-Marine Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) gets selected to participate in the Avatar program, a sort of military-industrial project engaged in plundering the natural resources of the faraway planet of Pandora. Of particular interest is a mineral called "unobtainium" (yes, really), which could be the solution to the apparently eternal energy crisis back on Earth. Unfortunately, Pandora's inhabitants, the Na'vi — who are bright blue and 10 feet tall, with long, whippy tails — are settled on a vast field of this stuff, and they don't want to move. The humans are of two minds about this problem. Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver), who heads the science team to which Jake has been assigned, wants to befriend the Na'vi and negotiate with them. To this end, "avatars" have been created — Na'vi-like figures fabricated out of human and Na'vi DNA that can be remotely powered by human "drivers" in the base headquarters and sent out among the natives to make friends and learn their language and their charmingly primitive ways.
On the other hand, the project's snarling security chief, Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang), and resident corporate greedhead Parker Selfridge (Giovanni Ribisi) would just as soon exterminate the Na'vi ("fly-bitten savages who live in trees," as Selfridge puts it) and seize their land. To this end, Quaritch secretly recruits Jake to bring back useful military intel from his nice-making science explorations among the Na'vi. Jake is okay with this at first, until he really gets to know the locals — especially a Na'vi princess called Neytiri (Zoe Saldana). So the plot boils down to this: Can Jake win Neytiri's heart (or whatever) and foil his fellow humans' plan for corporate conquest? Even as the movie's long, unhurried opening sequences are laying out all the relevant info, you can hear those questions answering themselves.
Fortunately, Cameron is a great action director. There's a lot to look at here: the luminescent glow of the jungle in which the Na'vi live, the ancient Tree of Souls with which they commune, a spectacular range of mountains hanging high in the sky up above Pandora — and there's a lot going on. The director and his battalion of digital technicians have cooked up a fantastical bestiary of Pandoran creatures — futuristic hammerhead rhinos; dogfighting battle dragons; and, in one virtuoso sequence, a vicious six-legged thingy that chases Jake through the jungle and off the edge of a cliff (see trailer). The meticulous detail in which these creatures have been rendered, and the complexity with which they're arrayed in the film's exotic environments, are undeniable marvels of moviemaking art.
Unfortunately, whenever the action lets up and we're returned to the piddling story, the picture slumps like a failed soufflé. It's also heavily laced with political instruction of a most familiar sort. Cameron, who's now 55, is a self-acknowledged aging hippie, and his boomer worldview is strictly by-the-numbers. Quaritch and Selfridge are evil Americans despoiling the Na'vi's idyllic planet in exactly the same way that the humans have (we're told) trashed their own native orb. The invaders are armed with deplorable corporate technology (an odd animosity in a major-studio movie that reportedly cost more than $300 million to make), and they speak the familiar — and here rather anachronistic — language of contemporary American warmongering. ("We will fight terror with terror!" "It's some kind of shock-and-awe campaign!")
The Na'vi, on the other hand, with their bows and arrows and long braided hair, are stand-ins for every spiritually astute and ecologically conscientious indigenous population ever ground down under the heel of rampaging Western imperialism. They appear to have no warlike impulses themselves, and they live in complete harmony with their environment. (They even talk to trees.) Why, the movie asks, as if the question were new, can't we be more like them?
The central question that "Avatar" poses, however, is whether expensively advanced filmmaking technology is enough in itself to carry a whole film. The story here is a simple mash-up of every old cowboys-and-Indians and jungle-adventure movie of the 1930s and '40s. And while Saldana manages to project shadings of emotion through her digital carapace, and Worthington and Joel David Moore (as a friendly biologist) bring nice-guy appeal to their roles, the characters are blandly conceived. We watch them go about their business advancing the predictable plot and uttering Cameron's sometimes clunky dialogue ("The sky people have sent us a message!" "This land is our land!"), and we wonder when the battle-dragons will come swooping back in to break the tedium. In the story, the machines don't win, of course; but in the tech-centric scheme of the movie, they conquer all.
Dances With Smurfs..................
It’s both: Visually stunning masterpiece and ham handed propaganda.
As South Park predicted: “Dances with Smurfs”
I’m really not interested in paying to watch propaganda. It looks like the movie is doing well at the box office so they surely don’t need my money anyway.
Pocahontas + Dances with wolves+ the military feel and “loaders” of Aliens.
As I posted yesterday, this movie is like jingling your keys in front of a cat. Entertainment for the easily amused.
Kurt Loder has been objective when encountering politically charged cinema. His movie reviews tend to fall toward libertarian/conservative more so than anything else.
Many good quality versions online.
I’ll see it soon enough, but in a manner minimizing the $$ flowing to its makers.
It’s a shame (the political crap), because “White Guy Goes To Be With The Natives” epics don’t HAVE to be one-sided. “Lawrence of Arabia” showed that the Arabs were just as riven with selfishness and worse as were the English.
I too have noted the same thing about Kurt’s reviews. He definately calls propaganda out for what it is... and coming from the MSM (cringing that MTV might be “mainstream”) it certainly is refreshing. Bravo, Kurt!
Count me easily amused. I liked it.
That’s the thing that’s always lost - what fallible bastards Native Americans are/were. Like most civilizations save THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the winners of wars among tribes resulted in one tribe enslaving the other.
The Native Americans were no different, enslaving neighbor conquered tribes when defeated in battle.
No people are innocent. None. In the end, the reason I’m not going to watch this movie, nor am I going to the church I’m currently going to anymore, as that in all things corporations and the rich are to blame.
Of course, nobody in the congregation is ‘rich’ (even though every last one of them are). Nobody in the congregation owns businesses that hires people (even though they do).
There was a column on the editorial page of the Seattle Times written by the D Rep of the 30th state congressional distric in WA, which was a real cake-taker for me. About 3/4’s of it you can synch with, and you are saying to yourself “This can’t be a Democrat”. Last quarter, the guy calls for mandatory union membership, all the way invoking God’s will in the matter.
That’s going to be their platform in 2010 - “This was God’s will, and you shouldn’t get in God’s way on this - where’s your compassion?”
If you don’t think they’ll win with it, then you haven’t been paying attention since 2001. How else do you elect a Muslim to be president? You get Hollywood to do it for you, and they did. Between Hollywood, Wall Street, and DC, they control the entire United States of America.
Lots of high tech glitz with characters who have no character and a formula, plotless story line. The first thing I thought of was an old (circa 1960’s) ‘Outer Limits’ episode with Robert Duval entitled ‘The Chameleon’.
Why? Because the "death to America" crowd never tires of repackaging its hateful message. That's why.
RinaseaofDs wrote: “The Native Americans were no different, enslaving neighbor conquered tribes when defeated in battle.”
..... Not true! Sometimes they just killed their conquered opponents and ate their internal organs.
;-]
Hollywood has been at this a very long time
Remeber Soldier Blue - OF course not, you are too young.
But
Soldier Blue is a 1970 American Revisionist Western movie directed by Ralph Nelson based very loosly on the events surrounding the 1864 Sand Creek massacre in the Colorado Territory.
(Hint, the Army is the bad guys)
I’m sure we could list one or more movies that trash the military (OK, lots and lots) or the US.
But this Avatar flick cost a bundle, and if it loses money, guess who won’t be making movies for a while?
Me? I’m gonna pass, thanks anyway.
Hollywood has been at this a very long time
Remeber Soldier Blue - OF course not, you are too young.
But
Soldier Blue is a 1970 American Revisionist Western movie directed by Ralph Nelson based very loosly on the events surrounding the 1864 Sand Creek massacre in the Colorado Territory.
(Hint, the Army is the bad guys)
I’m sure we could list one or more movies that trash the military (OK, lots and lots) or the US.
But this Avatar flick cost a bundle, and if it loses money, guess who won’t be making movies for a while?
Me? I’m gonna pass, thanks anyway.
“..... Not true! Sometimes they just killed their conquered opponents and ate their internal organs.”
War among the 1800 tribes of Nigeria is STILL conducted in part through cannibalism. Good catch - I stand corrected.
I didn’t know that old Kurt Pant-Load was still alive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.