Free Republic is a fringe right-wing Christian fundamentalist site

12/11/2009 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

Free Republic is a fringe right-wing Christian fundamentalist site... or so they say... and they might even be right.

We don't go for any of that godless left-wing big government socialist malarkey. And we do put our faith and trust in God, not government. We are pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Family, pro-Country and pro-Liberty.

We do not believe that government or science knows what's best for us or our children. We will make our own decisions thank you very much.

Every once in a while some group of posters get together and try to bend Free Republic to their will. Now, we tend to be pretty free-wheeling around here and will take a lot of guff and a lot of obnoxious insults from a lot of people, but eventually a breaking point is reached.

For example, when a group of RINO lovers recently banded together to try to force FR to accept an abortionist/gay rights RINO as our presidential candidate, they soon found themselves on the outs.

And a few years ago a group of evolutionists tried to force FR over to their way of thinking and they soon found themselves on the outs.

FR is a pro-God, pro-Creator, pro-Life, pro-Liberty site.

And now we have yet another group of Darwinists trying to have their Darwinist way with us. Well, as I've said before what doesn't kill us will only make us stronger.

Darwin Central has again declared war on FR. They have ping lists and email lists and will try to pull away as many FReepers as they possibly can. So be it. Those who would rather go with Darwin, please go. I sure as hell won't try to stop you.

FR will remain a pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Liberty, pro-Creator conservative site.

We wholeheartedly believe that our unalienable rights are a gift from God our Creator not from man or government. And no man, no government will ever deprive us of same.

Keep your powder dry.

[christianhomeschoolmommaof3]

2 Corinthians 5:21
God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.

[presently no screen name]

Why did you leave OFF, the part of your post that I was referring to?

Jesus carried our sins, not his own. 1,862 posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 12:41:06 AM by Natural Law

Tell US ALL, about Jesus not carrying HIS OWN sin!!

[reaganaut]

I suspect that is the post.

[Natural Law]

"not his own"

Because he was without sin. You came in on a conversation between christianhomeschoolmommaof3 and me and took something out of context (not unlike all of your other scholarly work). Now stop trying to make 2+2=5 or people will think you a doofus.

[CaptRon]

CAn’t find it. But apparently you have severa. And you claim to have several nasty posts from me. Lots of people don’t agree with you.

[christianhomeschoolmommaof3]

Jesus was born without sin, lived without sin then bore our sins in himself.
1 Peter 2:24
He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed.

[CaptRon]

I have never been hostile to a fellow freeper. You have made me a non-freeper. Congatulations.

[christianhomeschoolmommaof3]

Lol I said I was going to bed but I started catching up on the thread while eating a bedtime snack and now I am wide awake again. Great!

[presently no screen name]

Are you sure you have no relationship with GGG? Like him, you are so good at baiting people some might even call you a master.

YOU are OBSESSED with GGG. And have no courtesy to even ping the poster you CONSTANTLY berate. How many posts to me alone have you included GGG with your rant?

[valkyry1]

//Dizzying concept, no?//

rather limited actually

[Natural Law]

"1 Peter 2:24 He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed."

Thank you. It won't do any good. I'm just putting him on ignore. Like they say; if that old dog can't stop crapping on the rug I'm locking I'm in the back yard......

[ansel12]

>>>” YOu told other freepers I was tracking your posts. I wasn’t. You are a creep.”<<<

He actually said “So he goes all “three mile island” on me and starts with the threats to keep track of my posts.” which was true.

---

To: reaganaut
I’ll be sure to keep track of all your posts in the future. What is your problem here.
636 posted on Friday, December 11, 2009 11:43:38 PM by CaptRon

---

To: reaganaut
I will tell. Tracking my posts? You have never posted anyting someone objected to? I guess you have no real convivtions then. I’ll have to keep track of you like you did me.
679 posted on Saturday, December 12, 2009 12:08:52 AM by CaptRon

[reaganaut]

CAn’t find it. But apparently you have severa. And you claim to have several nasty posts from me.Lots of people don’t agree with you.
- - - - - - - - - —

Haven’t seen any disagreement with me, but whatever.

Can’t find it and the “nasty post” was removed by the mod. (#1870) the one where you threatened me. Which is confirmed by your convo with Ansel12, (#1883 and #1877)

Here is the post I was referring to that you say you cannot find:

Saturday, December 12, 2009 1:31:16 AM • 627 of 1,894
reaganaut to CaptRon; eyedigress; metmom; Flycatcher; Global2010; A Balrog of Morgoth; Pollster1; ...
What are you kidding me?! I am never hostile here. In 10 years I can only think of 1 time I have been hostile. Oh, wait, I did piss Debbie Schlussel off earlier this week, but I consider that a good thing.
Tell me what little thing I have unjustifiably jumpped on somenone for tonight.
- - - - - - - -
CaptRon, throughout this thread you have been short, hostile, demanding, accusatory, whiny, a complainer and just a plain Ass.
Not to mention several posts telling you to “chill out” or similar sentiments.
See posts:
39
151
164
196
237
286
296
302
351
372
394
403
412
Not to mention several posts to you telling you to “chill out” or similar sentiments.
Your back might hurt less if you get rid of that chip on your shoulder.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 599 | View Replies

[christianhomeschoolmommaof3]

You did misunderstand our conversation. Natural Law was clear that he believes Jesus was born without original sin and lived a sinless life so that He could be the sas. crafice for our sin. If you need me to I can find you all the posts. There is plenty that we disagree on, lets please not argue over the things we agree on. Thanks.

[presently no screen name]

Exactly. Jesus took our sins on the Cross. He was NOT born with sin!

HE WAS THE SPOTLESS LAMB!

Natural Law - you proved yourself once again. And don't hide behind the Catholic Church on that vile lie.

[reaganaut]

BTW. You seem to know what post you don’t like. YOu told other freepers I was tracking your posts. I wasn’t. You are a creep.

- - - - - - - -

Show me where I told other freepers that you were tracking my posts. You cannot because I DID not.

Now you are insulting me, lying about me, and defaming me.

Wow...
Just wow...

[christianhomeschoolmommaof3]

“sas. crafice” Lol. Preview is my friend.

[reaganaut]

thank you for posting that Ansel

[rae4palin]

This thread must not die. Just a few more comments to 2000 :)