Posted on 12/04/2009 4:47:27 PM PST by cycle of discernment
OFFICIAL REQUEST BY CONGRESSMEN TO SEE OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE WILL BE THE STRAW WHICH BREAKS THIS CAMEL’S BACK
Political analysis by John Charlton
Obama's presidential campaign was hailed for its forceful imagery, but after 11 months the public has come to understand the undisputed facts about him, don't fit the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
(Dec. 4, 2009) — Georgia’s representative in the U.S. House, Nathan Deal announced in early November that he and 10 House colleagues were going to sign a joint letter, asking Obama to publicly reveal his birth certificate,.
The simple enough question was rebuffed and ridiculed by the Main Stream Media, and even the Savannah Morning News, as if a birth certificate was some sort of private journal or diary of past affairs.
The mere fact that the liberals and progressives ridiculed Nathan Deal — whose only interest is to quiet the nation — shows that they have no substantive reason to oppose the request. It further shows that they know that Obama cannot oblige Deal and his co-signatories, for in Democratic circles nothing is a secret.
What will Obama say to Nathan Deal? The answer must come soon. Deal said that he was to send his letter after Thanksgiving. Any delay on the part of Barack Hussein Obama to oblige Deal, will only further erode his political influence in Washington, D.C..
Obama has been effectively checkmated by the concerted effort of public support, publicized lawsuits on the eligibility question, publicity campaigns such as those of World Net Daily and Charles Kerchner to put the issue in the face of liberals on a constant basis, and blogs and bloggers the world over.
If Obama obliges him, then the online image of a Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) provided by his campaign will be proven a forgery, according to the consensus of opinion of citizens who have studied the images posted on the net and found some images of the allegedly same document, contain a HI State seal and some do not.
If Obama does refuses, however, it will only further confirm that he has something to hide.
Palins remark that it is a valid issue and Ogden’s resignation as Deputy U.S. Attorney General in the same week, following the sending of Nathan Deal’s letter, appear to be diagnostic signs that the political establishment understands the risks and imminent crisis about to break. The publicity garnered by the testimony of the U.S. Marine, who goes by the nik, Race Bannon, only further tilt the Obama regime towards political implosion.
Even the pulse of Obama’s political support on the net tells the tale: a lull and quiet among them posting comments at opposition blogs is noticeable. There remain only the violent, the perverse and the somewhat mad to carry on the cheers of “Change,” which were the mind numbing drum beat of the Obama for American campaign, just 14 months ago.
The political momentum of the nation now follows diverse roads to the same destination, and the resulting fireworks are going to be much brighter and invigorating than those of any Fourth of July in many a year!
So what if that is released and contains no irregularities?
Then what?
Nope. I’m saying that not only isn’t he qualified to be president -or dog catcher- by his skills and career experience, he doesn’t even meet the minimal Constitutional requirements for the job.
Can anyone confirm this story? Can anyone certify the source? I’d like to believe all of this but I’m a skeptic by nature. I don’t even believe in man-made global warming. ;)
Executive privilege is a separation of powers concept, but only as it applies to the execution of executive power.
I suppose you can say that the Congressmen asking to see the President's birth documents is a separation of powers issue since they are in Congress and he is in the White House, but on the other hand Executive Privilege cannot be used to cover up crimes. And the Congress does have legitimate oversight responsibilities for Executive actions.
-PJ
That is the main argument Leo Donofrio made about the COLB. Since it is out on the web, there is no legal reason for the State of Hawaii NOT to release the long form birth certificate.
The Democrats, specifically Rahm Emmanuel, has said “We own Hawaii.” Which implies it ain’t ever gon’na happen.
We can draw our own conclusions from that.
So what if it shows a witness said Obama was born in Hawaii - no doctor or not born in a hospital?
Then what?
I sense that you might not be completely happy with your rep.
Wondering whether or not Obama can or will try to use executive privilege to avoid submitting proper documentation is not trolling. Neither is pondering the implications of Cheney’s failure to ask for objections at the electoral vote certification.
Get over your pathetic grudge already. It’s tiresome and childish.
The people will demand his BC in 2012...he’ll be unable without his BC to even be on many state ballots. This is a snowball and it is rolling....he’ll be forced to resign long before that, IMO.
It doesn’t take you long to whine like a victim. So how many times has that happened about 1,000 times over the last year?
And BTW, those guys you ping are trolls.
Bump
He knows.
Dude! You said “shine”! Dat’s racist!
Wow, that is a hall of shame.
Wouldn’t any “Official” request to see papers require a warrant under the 4th Amendment?
As I said, get over your pathetic grudge already. It’s tiresome and childish. And did I mention pathetic?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.