Posted on 12/04/2009 4:47:27 PM PST by cycle of discernment
OFFICIAL REQUEST BY CONGRESSMEN TO SEE OBAMAS BIRTH CERTIFICATE WILL BE THE STRAW WHICH BREAKS THIS CAMELS BACK
Political analysis by John Charlton
Obama's presidential campaign was hailed for its forceful imagery, but after 11 months the public has come to understand the undisputed facts about him, don't fit the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
(Dec. 4, 2009) Georgias representative in the U.S. House, Nathan Deal announced in early November that he and 10 House colleagues were going to sign a joint letter, asking Obama to publicly reveal his birth certificate,.
The simple enough question was rebuffed and ridiculed by the Main Stream Media, and even the Savannah Morning News, as if a birth certificate was some sort of private journal or diary of past affairs.
The mere fact that the liberals and progressives ridiculed Nathan Deal whose only interest is to quiet the nation shows that they have no substantive reason to oppose the request. It further shows that they know that Obama cannot oblige Deal and his co-signatories, for in Democratic circles nothing is a secret.
What will Obama say to Nathan Deal? The answer must come soon. Deal said that he was to send his letter after Thanksgiving. Any delay on the part of Barack Hussein Obama to oblige Deal, will only further erode his political influence in Washington, D.C..
Obama has been effectively checkmated by the concerted effort of public support, publicized lawsuits on the eligibility question, publicity campaigns such as those of World Net Daily and Charles Kerchner to put the issue in the face of liberals on a constant basis, and blogs and bloggers the world over.
If Obama obliges him, then the online image of a Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) provided by his campaign will be proven a forgery, according to the consensus of opinion of citizens who have studied the images posted on the net and found some images of the allegedly same document, contain a HI State seal and some do not.
If Obama does refuses, however, it will only further confirm that he has something to hide.
Palins remark that it is a valid issue and Ogdens resignation as Deputy U.S. Attorney General in the same week, following the sending of Nathan Deals letter, appear to be diagnostic signs that the political establishment understands the risks and imminent crisis about to break. The publicity garnered by the testimony of the U.S. Marine, who goes by the nik, Race Bannon, only further tilt the Obama regime towards political implosion.
Even the pulse of Obamas political support on the net tells the tale: a lull and quiet among them posting comments at opposition blogs is noticeable. There remain only the violent, the perverse and the somewhat mad to carry on the cheers of Change, which were the mind numbing drum beat of the Obama for American campaign, just 14 months ago.
The political momentum of the nation now follows diverse roads to the same destination, and the resulting fireworks are going to be much brighter and invigorating than those of any Fourth of July in many a year!
Someone OFFICIAL needs to call for further investigation of this
Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/
Why did filegate drop off the face of the earth in the MSM news?
Who knows?
My assertion is that Taitz is a lunatic.
He won't allow people to post on his site, or he simply will not accept the e-mail in any form?
What's going on here? These guys talk big but are really wilting lilies. A dust mite has more testosterone than they do!
You are entitled to your opinions.
How would you finish this sentence?:
My assertion is that Obama is a ______.
...the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever known in my life.
I am sure Mark has known from the beginning that Obama does not qualify to be President simply because his father was not a US citizen. And with the questions about Obama’s birthplace still not answered, I would have thought Mark would have been calling for the simple answers long ago!
Has anyone seen Obama’s diplomas from Columbia or Harvard, or even a yearbook picture from when he attended? I wonder if he really did attend. Perhaps he attended Columbia College instead? And was he really editor of the Harvard Law Review and never write an article for it?
LoL!
Weak-assed pestilential jackass in need of removal.
Lead, follow, or get out of the way.
The fact that conservative (of varying degrees) media people say nothing bothers me much more than the fact that leftist media people say nothing.
Either they’ve been threatened or they’re gutless. Or both, actually.
Utterly revealing.
I don't believe you, and I'm sure many other don't either.
Revealing indeed.
Nonsense. Total nonsense. You and your gang of flying monkey types appear on eligibility threads that have nothing to do with O.Taitz.
You are lying.
I don’t care if you don’t believe me. All you have to do to verify my statement is research my posting history.
But you won’t do it because it would prove that your accusations about the intent of “whack-a-mole” pings are baseless. You’re content to make hit-and-run accusations.
Oh really,... I don’t care that you don’t care.
What I posted in #182 are correct. It’s a troll ping.
If one is “checkmated” in the forest, and no one hears the cry foul, was one really checkmated?
His co-conspirators will silence the lambs.
If you’re going to participate in the conversation, keep up and pay attention.
The accusation was that the “whack-a-mole” pings are intended to call in the trolls to beat up birthers. That’s incorrect and easily proven false with a simple search. “Whack-a-mole” pings are reserved for Orly Taitz threads ONLY. Their purpose is to have some fun at Orly’s expense.
As I said, don’t flatter yourselves. “Whack-a-mole isn’t about you.
The problem with that theory is that Frank Davis moved to Hawaii in 1948 and the Dunham's lived in Seattle, with Stanley Ann graduating from Mercer Island High school in 1960. Moreover, in Davis' book, he says that it was with his first wife that he had the threesome with the underage girl. While I'm not certain when he divorced her, he married his second wife in 1946.
Cars, quo warranto, and Obama
With so many lawsuits filed every day in America, one more might seem irrelevant. There is one however that should be watched, but will most likely escape notice. For a little while at any rate…
Last summer, hundreds of Chrysler and GM Dealers lost their franchises in the Chrysler bankruptcy sale. Many of those dealers vowed to fight what they saw as a heavy miscarriage of justice. It was simply un-American, and shocking to find that something like this could happen here, that the government could take over a private business, and then take that business away from hundreds of private dealerships. Many of those dealers had profitable businesses; in some cases those businesses had been run by families successfully for 50 years, in some cases more.
Neil Cavuto welcomed former Chrysler dealer James Anderer to his show on Fox Business News Daily to talk about a case that has been filed by a group of dealers who lost their businesses in the Washington D.C. District Court. Lead Plaintiff Anderer mentioned a team of legal experts while describing the case to Cavuto, and an anonymous source has named Leo Donofrio and Steve Pidgeon as having been retained by a group of Chrysler dealers who lost their franchise in the Chrysler bankruptcy sale. They have been retained to bring two actions:1. A motion to reconsider the Court's approval of the dealer rejections.
2. A quo warranto in the D.C. District Court pertaining to Obama and his administration.
This case may initially slide under the MSM radar; however, it may be the single most serious case to be brought against The Obama Administration and the President himself to date.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.