Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Finally, A Decision for Afghanistan: We're In It to Win It
Sarah Palin Facebook ^ | Dec 1, 2009 | BigTigerMike

Posted on 12/01/2009 7:43:51 PM PST by Bigtigermike

Three months ago, I joined a number of Americans in urging President Obama to provide the resources necessary to achieve our goals in Afghanistan. Tonight, I am glad he mostly heeded that advice........


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012palin; 2012sarah; 2012sarahpalin; afghanistan; madamepresident; madamepresidentpalin; mittbotsontheattack; obama; oef; oefsurge; palin; palin2012; ruderomneylover; ruderomneylovr; ruderomneyluver; ruderomneyluvr; sarah2012; waronterror; zotorama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-376 next last
At long last, President Obama decided to give his military commanders much of what they need to accomplish their mission in Afghanistan. In the end, he decided to endorse a “surge” for Afghanistan, applying the counterinsurgency principles of “clear, hold and build” that worked so well in Iraq. Given that he opposed the surge in Iraq, it is even more welcome that he now supports a surge in Afghanistan.

This approach means, as Senator John McCain has noted, that “We now have an opportunity to build a bipartisan consensus in support of a vital national security priority: defeating Al-Qaeda and its violent extremist allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and ensuring that these countries never again serve as bases for terrorist attacks against America and our allies.”

We should be clear, however, that fewer troops mean assuming more risk. Talk of an exit date also risks sending the wrong message. We should be in Afghanistan to win, not to set a timetable for withdrawal that signals a lack of resolve to our friends, and lets our enemies believe they can wait us out. As long as we’re in to win, and as long as troop level decisions are based on conditions on the ground and the advice of our military commanders, I support President Obama’s decision.

- Sarah Palin

1 posted on 12/01/2009 7:43:52 PM PST by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

I understand why she said this but I disagree with her. I NEVER heard Obama use the word Victory, NOT ONCE. He smeared the Bush Administration, and the look on the cadet’s faces said it all. He also did not say “God Bless our troops” at the end of the speech(she might have missed that).


2 posted on 12/01/2009 7:47:16 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I agree. Most of the time I agree with her, but this time I have to say she’s off base.


3 posted on 12/01/2009 7:49:05 PM PST by gore_sux_2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

She boxed Obama and the media in.....”SEE I Supported the President on his decision but he clearly didn’t trust the generals and cut and run out of there”


4 posted on 12/01/2009 7:49:17 PM PST by Bigtigermike (Loose lips sink ships, stay away RINO's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gore_sux_2000

She is WAY off base.


5 posted on 12/01/2009 7:51:12 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gore_sux_2000

I understand why she said this, basically she is saying she will be watching closely to see what happens in Afghanistan. It’s a “safe” statement. I guess I was expecting to hear her slam Obama but oh well. We can’t agree on everything.


6 posted on 12/01/2009 7:51:41 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Bigtigermike
Given that he opposed the surge in Iraq, it is even more welcome that he now supports a surge in Afghanistan.

Death by 1000 cuts........

8 posted on 12/01/2009 7:52:04 PM PST by capydick (''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Is she serious?

She better rethink this one.


9 posted on 12/01/2009 7:52:07 PM PST by Palladin (Holder and Obama terrorize New Yorkers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
In it to win it.

The woman is gifted at conveying a message in clear no nonsense language.

10 posted on 12/01/2009 7:53:39 PM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be RE-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

“I understand why she said this, basically she is saying she will be watching closely to see what happens in Afghanistan. It’s a “safe” statement. I guess I was expecting to hear her slam Obama but oh well. We can’t agree on everything.”

Exactly, She is trying to be pragmatic in a sense all the while boxing him in if he cut and ran (which he will do!)


11 posted on 12/01/2009 7:54:15 PM PST by Bigtigermike (Loose lips sink ships, stay away RINO's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shaft29

Having fun acting like a 5 year old on every thread?


12 posted on 12/01/2009 7:54:25 PM PST by MNlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shaft29
Sara Palin is a nimrod lightweight.

I've never heard of Sara Palin, but I love Sarah Palin.
13 posted on 12/01/2009 7:54:27 PM PST by IMissPresidentReagan (ATTENTION RINOS: IT'S NOT THAT I'M TOO FAR RIGHT; IT'S THAT YOU'RE TOO FAR WRONG! fubo funp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shaft29

You can disagree with her but do you have to come here and be such a jerk. Your not in the 6th grade anymore


14 posted on 12/01/2009 7:55:25 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

“Is she serious?

She better rethink this one.”

I agree. This speech was nothing to post on Facebook about.
She should have reserved comment until there was actually action on the speech.


15 posted on 12/01/2009 7:55:31 PM PST by jamndad5 ("I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Except that Obama does not want to win it. He wants to look like he wants to win it and at that same time he is going to cut and run just in time for the 2012 elections.


16 posted on 12/01/2009 7:56:13 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

This was a smart move on her part. She’s calling Obama out to win the war and she’s driving his base crazy because they are not happy he’s adding troops plus now he’s set a policy that even Sarah Palin agrees with. Heads must be exploding right now over at DU.


17 posted on 12/01/2009 7:56:57 PM PST by offduty (Joe Biden is still looking for the video tape of FDR's address to the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Sarah Barracuda

She didn’t see the speech (at a book signing). This may have been written beforehand. I hope she “revises and extends” her remarks.


19 posted on 12/01/2009 7:57:29 PM PST by Al B. (Sarah Palin: Government "can't make you happy or healthy or wealthy or wise".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike; All

“At long last, President Obama decided to give his military commanders much of what they need to accomplish their mission in Afghanistan. In the end, he decided to endorse a “surge” for Afghanistan, applying the counterinsurgency principles of “clear, hold and build” that worked so well in Iraq. Given that he opposed the surge in Iraq, it is even more welcome that he now supports a surge in Afghanistan.”

I agree with Sarah Palin. I don’t like POTUS Obama, wished someone else was in office. However, for the most part the decision is a good one....IF it is aggressively pursued. I value the lives of American military personnel. I want this surge to work, because I want to bring this conflict to a close. If a POTUS I can’t stand gets credit, then so be it. I put the lives of troops ahead of my political desires.


20 posted on 12/01/2009 7:58:10 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-376 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson