Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek: Why Dick Cheney Should Run in 2012
Newsweek ^ | December 7, 2009 | Jon Meacham

Posted on 12/01/2009 12:59:43 PM PST by caddystacks

I think we should be taking the possibility of a Dick Cheney bid for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012 more seriously, for a run would be good for the Republicans and good for the country. (The sound you just heard in the background was liberal readers spitting out their lattes.)

Why? Because Cheney is a man of conviction, has a record on which he can be judged, and whatever the result, there could be no ambiguity about the will of the people. The best way to settle arguments is by having what we used to call full and frank exchanges about the issues, and then voting. A contest between Dick Cheney and Barack Obama would offer us a bracing referendum on competing visions.

One of the problems with governance since the election of Bill Clinton has been the resolute refusal of the opposition party (the GOP from 1993 to 2001, the Democrats from 2001 to 2009, and now the GOP again in the Obama years) to concede that the president, by virtue of his victory, has a mandate to take the country in a given direction.

A Cheney victory would mean that America preferred a vigorous unilateralism to President Obama's unapologetic multilateralism, and vice versa

No one foresaw Cheney's reemergence as a force in the politics of the 21st century until it happened. So perhaps the pattern is set, a pattern of insistent denial of interest—until it turns out that, hey, he is interested.

Cheney's memoirs are due to be published—and thus due to be promoted—in the spring of 2011, not long before the caucuses and primaries begin. I'll bet you that the Barnes & Noble in Des Moines (there's a big one at The Shoppes at Three Fountains) is on the book tour

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; cheney; cheney2012; darthvader; dick; dickcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: FormerACLUmember

Where can I buy the bumper stickers—all of them?!


21 posted on 12/01/2009 1:21:34 PM PST by MissNomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caddystacks

Interesting reasoning by the author and, I think, right on target. The Republicans need to offer a clear alternative to Obama, regardless who the nominee is. The biggest danger is that the party nominates a lackluster candidate (normal against an incumbent) with Obama-lite views and fails to take advantage of the dynamics in the voter pool.....

hh


22 posted on 12/01/2009 1:22:46 PM PST by hoosier hick (Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
He looks like a president to me!


23 posted on 12/01/2009 1:24:41 PM PST by caddystacks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: caddystacks

Cheney would lose and that’s why Newsweek wants him to run.


24 posted on 12/01/2009 1:29:56 PM PST by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caddystacks

I said it before, I’ll say it again... if there’s a massive attack on this country in the next two years, Cheney will run and Cheney will win. I love Palin, but if we’re attacked, America is going to be begging for a leader like Cheney.

And Newsweak should be careful what they wish for. The only conceivable way I could ever feel sorry for Zero is if he had to go against Dick Cheney in a debate.


25 posted on 12/01/2009 1:30:48 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl

A'll be bach?


26 posted on 12/01/2009 1:31:45 PM PST by McGruff (We're Going Rogue Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: caddystacks
Howz about Cheney/Cheney 2012 ?

Now THAT could be an "historic" Administration, too

27 posted on 12/01/2009 1:32:14 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: saganite

I think Pallis said it best. Cheney would draw more fire than Sarah Palin and you see how many “conservatives” get cold feet over the fire Sarah draws. Also, Cheney is a political insider and the only thing you would hear about is Halliburton. It is hypocritical for the left to criticize Cheney over government contracts, but that has never stopped them before. I want a fresh face. Sarah still has a fresh face, but it won’t be fresh after 2012. After 2012 I will look for new inspiration. I am open to someone else, but someone else will have to lay his track record on the table and not just try to sell me talking points.


28 posted on 12/01/2009 1:32:36 PM PST by Sarah-bot (Palin or Communism -- You decide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Which one is on top?


29 posted on 12/01/2009 1:36:06 PM PST by Sarah-bot (Palin or Communism -- You decide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hoosier hick
The Republicans need to offer a clear alternative to Obama, regardless who the nominee is.

That's one of the reasons Sarah Palin resonates with folks. She is the walking, talking, total polar opposite to the Kenyan and his warped ideology

30 posted on 12/01/2009 1:36:06 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sarah-bot

He could become Palin’s secretary of Defense. The libs will have apoplexy!


31 posted on 12/01/2009 1:38:34 PM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: saganite; trisham
I lost track where I stole that, but here is more:


32 posted on 12/01/2009 1:38:40 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. - H. L. Menken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MissNomer

see 32.


33 posted on 12/01/2009 1:40:08 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. - H. L. Menken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sarah-bot
Which one is on top?

Would it matter?

I mean, if you really get down to it?

I think Liz is gonna run for something......she's out there on almost a weekly basis now.

Seen more of her in the past 6 months, than the last 8 years prior.

And I gots to tell you, I really really like what I see.

34 posted on 12/01/2009 1:42:36 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: caddystacks
They're still trying to pick our candidate for us and derail the Palin juggernaught.

Sorry guys. Thanks but no thanks.
35 posted on 12/01/2009 1:43:24 PM PST by Antoninus (The RNC's dream ticket: Romney / Scozzafava 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caddystacks
Chaney could not even influence Bush to veto any of those outrageous spending bills Bush dutifully signed from the Dem House...or...Chaney didn't care.

Chaney has all the baggage of Bush either way.

36 posted on 12/01/2009 1:47:56 PM PST by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caddystacks
One of the problems with governance since the election of Bill Clinton has been the resolute refusal of the opposition party (the GOP from 1993 to 2001, the Democrats from 2001 to 2009, and now the GOP again in the Obama years) to concede that the president, by virtue of his victory, has a mandate to take the country in a given direction.

Congress in 1994 didn't have a mandate?

You lost me there.

37 posted on 12/01/2009 1:54:22 PM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah-bot

The problem with fresh faces is that we don’t necessarily know what they believe or how they will govern. Obama is a fresh face. I think that 4 years of Obama mistakes and missteps might send the country looking for someone with a lot more experience under their belt.


38 posted on 12/01/2009 1:58:20 PM PST by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: caddystacks

Newsweek: Anybody but Palin. (Too bad Huck is out of the running.)


39 posted on 12/01/2009 2:01:59 PM PST by Kells
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
..."I think we should be taking the possibility of a Dick Cheney bid for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012"...

Could it be they see Cheney as the QUEER CONNECTION?... becasus of his daughter being a lesbian?

NO, No more Bushes or Cheneys or the old guard. NEW CLEAN BLOOD please.

40 posted on 12/01/2009 2:12:08 PM PST by ElPatriota (The SILENCE of the Catholic Church on the war (...Actually I'm hearing MORE....) ** DEAFENING **)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson