Posted on 12/01/2009 11:37:49 AM PST by StACase
Edited on 12/01/2009 11:39:39 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
LONDON
(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...
Another point about the Al Gore punishment is that he perpetrated his fraud on children. Millions of children who were made to watch his movie and repeat his drivel as fact. There is something particularly heinous about his appeal to children. A man who knowingly misinforms children for his own monetary gain is a very vile creature.
This is a very large scale fraud case.
It’s like someone taking investment money in manufacturing a “perpetual motion machine” that has ginned up the results to spur investment.
There has been willful deceit at a high level and certainly at the core some knew about it.
Al Gore and his cronies denounced anyone who would challenge the findings by saying “too late, consensus is in, only ‘flat-Earthers’, ‘creationists’, and ‘retards’ don’t accept the reality of man-made global climate change”. There was no public debate. No outside review from skeptics was tolerated. There was an “industry” blacklist of those who challenged the findings.
How about “banishment”? Put Mr. Gore and his family at an outpost on the moon?
If monckton is not part of the investigation then it is rigged.
Won’t be a real backlash until the Nobel jerks take OwlBore’s medal and millions away from him.
You sure this isn’t from scrappleface or the Onion?
In the UK where it has been shown in schools, a court found that there were something like 8 certifiable lies in the movie. It can still be shown in schools but the students are informed of the falsehoods.
When Mr. Gore was confronted with a question regarding this, he listed off one or two and said that while the polar bears are no LONGER endangered (numbers are up from something like 5,000 to 25,000) “somebody should tell the poor wittle polar bears...” guffaw guffaw.
He’s a pantywaist and cannot debate the evidence. He has helped to perpetrate a fraud.
I'd hold off on that bet if I were you. *developing economies* (i.e. China and India) were exempted under Kyoto, and I'm guessing would also be under anything that comes out of Crapenhagen. It's about fairness, you understand, and holding back the succesful nations and redistributing their wealth, while allowing lesser states to catch up.
China and India would love to see heavy industry in the west shut down altogether.
It may be false hope, but I keep going back to a quote from an AP story on 11/24:
Trenberth, a well-respected atmospheric scientist, said it did not appear that all the documents stolen from the university had been distributed on the Internet by the hackers.
This, of course, refers to Kevin Trenberth, head of the climate analysis section of the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, CO, who is in the thick of the leaked CRU emails.
Are there more? Are UEA, NCAR and the IPCC running scared? One can only hope.
Al Gore will probably head the “independent review panel.”
Revalation or the cover up?
remember fake but accurate
I bet it’ll be the UN who investigates!
Or Hansen!
The university says Phil Jones will relinquish his position until the completion of an independent review into allegations that he worked to alter the way in which global temperature data was presented.
I think that the moon would be too far removed. Placing him in portable stocks moving to various public squares following one inclement weather phenomenon to another inclement weather phenomenon might be more fitting. People could jeer and cajole him as he shivered and froze and got soaked to the bone.
Are they now going to pull an ACORN and start shredding (or just throwing away) compromising documents?
They've already ready used the "storage issues" excuse to explain why some communications no longer exist.
There needs to be a freeze on their access to the existing files so that there is no coverup of the full level of deceit.
Why not? Barney Frank got to ask questions of those involved in the banking collapse rather than being forced to testify under oath about what he knew, when he knew it, his "benefits" from those inside the companies, and why he blocked efforts by the Bush administration to investigate.
>> How about banishment? Put Mr. Gore and his family at an outpost on the moon? <<
The moon is too good for Gore, how about sending him to the SUN. But don’t worry Al Gore lovers, we will send him during the night so he won’t get burned to a crisp.
Science is fact based. Climate Science is conjecture based. There is nothing scientific about conjecture and these conjurers are now being exposed. Mayby Al Gore will be exposed with them.
Jones didn’t “overstate” anything. HE LIED LIKE A DOLLAR WATCH!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.