Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AL-Gov. 2010: Mitt Romney endorses gubernatorial candidate (another Romneybot)
WSFA ABC Channel 12 Montgomery, Ala. ^ | 2009-11-30

Posted on 11/30/2009 11:59:47 AM PST by rabscuttle385

MONTGOMERY, AL (WSFA) - Former Republican presidential candidate endorses Montgomery's gubernatorial candidate. WSFA 12 News confirmed overnight that Mitt Romney will endorse state treasurer Kate Ivey in her Republican race for governor. Romney cited Ivey's conservative background as the main reason for his support.

Ivey served as Alabama chair-person of Romney's 2008 presidential campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsfa.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: 2010; al2010; alabama; kateivey; obama4romney; pimpromneyhere; rinos; romney; romney4obama; romneybot

1 posted on 11/30/2009 11:59:50 AM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I see there are six other Republican candidates. Can we assume that Ivey is the worst?

Or is Huckabee planning to endorse an amnestied murderer?


2 posted on 11/30/2009 12:03:29 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

No the worst is Moore. He would be hard to be topped.


3 posted on 11/30/2009 12:08:51 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; AzaleaCity5691; Impy

And with that, I’m officially switching my endorsement for AL Governor from Ivey to Bradley Byrne.


4 posted on 11/30/2009 12:12:49 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Did Ivey support Riley’s proposed tax increase in 2003 via Amendment One?


5 posted on 11/30/2009 12:26:27 PM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

As long as we don’t elect Charles Barkley, I will be happy. That idiot wanting to be governor sends chills down my spine. I think we will say with a republican easily. I just hope it is not a RINO type republican.


6 posted on 11/30/2009 12:27:52 PM PST by RetiredArmy (Read Psalms 109:8. PRAY it applies to Obama and his Marxist Dimocrats. V. 7 ain't bad either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Sorry, I don’t know. I don’t follow AL politics that much. I do know Bradley Byrne and will probably vote for him unless some of his important positions are inconsistent to mine.


7 posted on 11/30/2009 1:09:18 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JLS

I could actually see Moore losing to the Rat Arthur Davis


8 posted on 11/30/2009 3:44:33 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj

Arthur Davis is a Obama wannabe. Davis was smeared by his opponent, long time incumbent Hillard, as being the Jewish and White candidate in 2002. Davis beat Hillard by appealing to both white and black voters. I noticed that the youunger members of the Congressional Black Caucus - Davis, Meek the son, Sanford Bishop, and Ford Jr. - want to appeal to people of all races. Whereas, Rangel and Maxine just want to be a black only Congesscritter. Ironically, if Obama did beat Bobby Rush in 2000, Obama would have been strong armed by Rangel and Maxine to vote far left on the issues. Thus leaving a noticeable trail of socialism. That would made Obama unelectable in 2008.


9 posted on 11/30/2009 7:13:55 PM PST by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yongin; Impy

Artur (no h) is clearly more Conservative than Earl Hilliard, but he has tried to position himself as “moderate” enough to win statewide (Zero, by comparison, never left the extreme left of the spectrum*). I’m not sure he can beat the Ag Commissioner for the nomination, but if he does, I think virtually any Republican can defeat Davis, including Chief Justice Moore, given what the climate will be in 2010.

(*As an aside, the worst thing to have happened to Zero would’ve been his beating Bobby Rush, he certainly wouldn’t have ended up in the Senate and Presidency as he did)


10 posted on 11/30/2009 7:38:50 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; yongin

Artur? Ar-ter? Ar-tour? Ha I never noticed. Or forgot if someone told me before.

Hillard was an anti-semite wackjob in the McKinney mold so yes Davis is to his right. He’s definitely voting with a statewide race in mind though. In his heart I’m sure he supports Obamacare.

It’s true the younger black dems are less radical then the previous generation. Part of it is those old pinkos are just plain out of touch with reality. And I’d guess another part of it is ambition. Hillard was never gonna be more than a congressman. People like Davis and Ford Jr. (he wanted to be the first black president) and Newark Mayor Cory Booker had aspirations to higher office.

Obama is an exception in that he’s totally radical, University radical types like Ayres put him up to run. But he was also called “white” even “halfrican” by Bobby Rush’s people. I actually remember reading an article about that congressional primary at the time. A third candidate in the race was some cop, I was hoping he would win. He probably just ran to split the anti-Rush vote.

I don’t know what would have happened to his career if he had won. Maybe he would have been pigeonholed as a congressman from a black district and been unable to run his ‘outsider’ campaign for the Senate.

It’s fascinating how Obama, W. Bush, Clinton, (and John Kerry) all lost races for the house (and HW Bush for the Senate, twice). I wonder how that would have effected their careers.

Clinton wouldn’t have lasted long in the NW Arkansas district. Out by ‘80 if not before then.

Bush and Kerry likely could have stayed in the house as long as they wanted.

HW still probably would have ended up as VP under Reagan if not before then.


11 posted on 12/01/2009 12:55:27 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Jesse Jackson said Davis is not really a black man cause he voted against Obamacare. Then he took it back.


12 posted on 12/01/2009 1:07:22 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Artur, pronounced like it sounds.

Junior Ford. Yes, his father was grooming him to be the first Black President. When that would’ve happened (absent Zero) is the question. He couldn’t have run in ‘08, barely a year after winning the Senate seat. However, if both he and Zero had run at the same time, that might’ve had Hillary get the nomination. Junior would’ve had a real problem in a Dem national primary, because he would’ve been considered a “right-winger” by their standards (going by his House record), which is the kiss of death. He’d have had to have moved hard-left the moment he got in the Senate, but doing so would jeopardize his hold on the seat, unless he was only planning to hold it for a single term.

Cory Booker. It will be interesting to see if the Dems try to recruit him to run against Gov. Christie in 2013. If Sarah Palin is President by then, Booker might have a better shot, as the economy may likely still be in the crapper (a la Reagan in his first two years in office), but if Zero is in his second term, probably he’ll have less of a chance. I frankly don’t know what kind of an effect Christie or McDonnell (VA) are going to have given that with respect to the national climate, there’s only so much they can do, since national economic policy and gov’t expansion is well out of their hands.

Had those Presidents/Presidential candidates ended up in the House or Senate at an earlier date, it obviously would’ve changed their careers to a degree. For Zero, the House seat would’ve been a trap for him, with perhaps the only way out attempting one of two ways, either running for Chicago Mayor or IL Governor. If he went for Mayor, he’d never have ended up as President.

For Dubya, had he beaten his DINO opponent in 1978, Kent Hance, he might’ve ended up going to the Senate by 1984 (instead of Phil Gramm), and perhaps the Governorship later on and the Presidency (just a different route there).

Had Clinton won the NW Arkansas 3rd district, he might’ve held onto it for a time (since, after all, starting in ‘74, a LOT of GOP districts were held by Dems), but he’d have been hemmed in, and likely would’ve had to go for the Senate or Governorship before long, probably in 1978, so it might not have changed his career that dramatically (unless he went to the Senate). The GOP would’ve merely gotten the seat back as soon as he vacated it with somebody we’ve never heard of today.

If Papa Bush had won the Senate race in either 1964 or 1970, he’d still have probably found a way to the White House (or Vice-Presidency, at least, maybe as Jerry Ford’s running mate in 1976 - for which he could’ve been like Lloyd Bentsen, running for reelection and for VP at the same time, and it might’ve tipped TX into the GOP column (still for a 271D-266R EV win for Carter, unless Bush could’ve knocked another Southern state into the column).

Kerry might’ve been the least effected. Had he won that then-GOP 5th district in 1972, it would’ve eliminated Paul Tsongas, since he beat that Republican, Paul Cronin, in 1974. Kerry would’ve been the 1978 Senate nominee instead of Tsongas, and perhaps beaten Ed Brooke, so he’d have gotten the same Senate seat 6 years earlier. Although I think Tsongas was considered slightly more Conservative than Brooke, and ‘78 saw a rebuke of the most left-wing people, so perhaps Brooke might’ve eked out a victory over Kerry since he clearly was to the left of both. Kerry might then have run for Governor in ‘82 against Dukakis, perhaps allowing Ed King to win renomination and reelection to a second term. Kerry might then have tried again to run for the Senate in ‘84 against Ed Brooke (presuming Brooke wouldn’t have switched parties, as he would’ve been highly uncomfortable in Reagan’s Republican-majority Senate). Come to think of it, Brooke could’ve had that seat as long as he wanted as a Democrat. It was only a matter of time before he’d have been defeated in a GOP primary as long as he voted that left-wing.


13 posted on 12/01/2009 2:51:00 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I bet Daley would have chewed him up in a Mayoral race.


14 posted on 12/02/2009 3:18:49 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson