Skip to comments.
TDB's Tina Brown Explains: Palin's Confidence Based on Ignorance
http://newsrealblog.com/2009/11/27/tdbs-tina-brown-explains-palins-confidence-based-on-ignorance/ ^
| Nov. 27, '09
| Michael van der Galien
Posted on 11/28/2009 2:32:34 PM PST by T.L.Sink
Once again, MSNBC enabled a Palin-basher to spew her hatred of Palin on national television. Tina Brown is founder and editor-in-chief of "The Daily Beast" website and a convinced Leftist. Needless to say, she also hates Palin's guts, which automatically makes her one of MSNBC's all-time favorite bloggers. If Palin was even half as uninformed as Brown and her ilk pretend, she would not have been as successful a governor of Alaska as she has been. There was a reason more than 80% of Alaskans approved her handling of the job. And that reason was that she was good at what she did. Have you ever heard of a total ignoramus who was a great governor nonetheless? Right, me neither. But that doesn't prevent fake feminists like Brown from insulting one of the most successful women in America today. They don't hate her because she's not intelligent enough for their taste - because she IS very intelligent indeed - but because she's CONSERVATIVE.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bloggersandpersonal; brown; msnbc; palin; pds; sarahpalin; sourcetitlenoturl; tinabrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
We all know that MSNBC (or MSDNC, as Rush calls it) is just a propaganda organ for liberal Democrats. But the obsessive and relentless attacks on Palin should shame even them - assuming they were capable of being shamed. Matthews, Maddow, and Olbermann specialize in character assassination and political mendacity. We know there are some intelligent liberals but this trio represents trash TV and journalistic hackery. They are liberals with NO ABILITY.
1
posted on
11/28/2009 2:32:35 PM PST
by
T.L.Sink
To: T.L.Sink
2
posted on
11/28/2009 2:35:23 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: T.L.Sink
I don’t know if Palin will get the nomination in 2012 or if she can win the White House and if she even wants it. If she can or does, man-o-man, will it be grand to watch all this punditry wail and gnash teeth!
3
posted on
11/28/2009 2:35:37 PM PST
by
stevem
To: T.L.Sink
Someone here refers to that awful network as “MSLSD”! Fitting, I’d say.
4
posted on
11/28/2009 2:35:49 PM PST
by
Sister_T
(Stealing from the rich to give to the poor is still stealing ... Exodus 20:15)
To: T.L.Sink
Whoa! We’d better listen to Tina Brown, that arrogant slut!
5
posted on
11/28/2009 2:37:05 PM PST
by
A. Morgan
(The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. Lawrence)
To: T.L.Sink
"editor-in-chief of "The Daily Beast" website and a convinced Leftist."
I love these people who whip up a little website to spew their vitriol, and proclaim themselves to be an "editor in chief". My question is, if they're so good, then why haven't they got a real job as editor in chief with an accredited publication?
It's a blog...millions of them out there....
6
posted on
11/28/2009 2:37:46 PM PST
by
FrankR
(SENATE: You cram it down our throats in '09, We'll shove it up your ass in '10...count on it.)
To: T.L.Sink
7
posted on
11/28/2009 2:45:00 PM PST
by
Slyfox
To: Slyfox
GUILTY!!
8
posted on
11/28/2009 2:46:08 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I will raise $2 million for Sarah Palin: What will you do?)
To: Slyfox
Separated at birth, baby!
9
posted on
11/28/2009 2:54:47 PM PST
by
6SJ7
(atlasShruggedInd: ON)
To: SandRat
Who or what is a “Tina Brown’’ and why should I care?
10
posted on
11/28/2009 2:57:18 PM PST
by
JoeMac
(''Dats all I can stands 'cuz I can't stands no more''. Popeye The Sailorman)
To: T.L.Sink
If I had to face Tina Browns all day I would feel pretty confident myself.
11
posted on
11/28/2009 3:00:11 PM PST
by
LiberConservative
(0bama was elected to lead, not to bow.)
To: JoeMac
“editor-in-chief of “The Daily Beast” website and a convinced Leftist.”
12
posted on
11/28/2009 3:00:13 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
Can you imagine how horrible it will get for her in 2012 if she wins the nomination and actually runs? The media will morph into rabid, foaming at the mouth, barking dogs. You have to be pretty strong to gird yourself up for that eventuality.
13
posted on
11/28/2009 3:00:31 PM PST
by
CanaGuy
(Go Harper!)
To: All
Here is the OLD HAG :) By the way she is boss of guess who: Miss Piggy! otherwise known as MEG-HAM MCCAIN... That's right. It's all a click
14
posted on
11/28/2009 3:02:31 PM PST
by
ElPatriota
(The SILENCE of the Catholic Church on the war (...Actually I'm hearing MORE....) ** DEAFENING **)
To: JoeMac
Tina Brown used to be an editor at some bathroom-reader in New York, I forget which one. She's definitely over the hill and trying desperately to extend a dismal, failed career by playing out her twilight years in the minors.
No reason to care what she thinks. Nobody does, really, any more.
To: JoeMac
...Who or what is a Tina Brown and why should I care?... Only because it is good to know who your enemies are. Or Sarah Palin's enemies in this case. It's a click of LEFT queens who know each other and think alike in WDC. Like Ariana Huffington (Huffington Post). Tina Brown (Daily Beast) who employs MegHam McCain. I would call them all enemies of Sarah.
16
posted on
11/28/2009 3:19:00 PM PST
by
ElPatriota
(The SILENCE of the Catholic Church on the war (...Actually I'm hearing MORE....) ** DEAFENING **)
To: T.L.Sink
To: T.L.Sink
Typically Obama, and his running dog lackeys such as the MSNBC management, can attract ONLY third-rate talent.
Matthews, Maddow, and Olbermann are doomed by their very natures. They can do no better.
18
posted on
11/28/2009 4:12:44 PM PST
by
muawiyah
(Git Out The Way)
To: T.L.Sink
What people are responding to is that great vitality, that confidence it doesnt matter that the confidence is based on a kind of total ignorance.Actually, it is the opinions about Sarah Palin, held by Tina Brown, and her ILK, that are based on total, WILLFUL ignorance.
19
posted on
11/28/2009 4:14:53 PM PST
by
SuziQ
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson