Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic does not and will not support RINOS!! Not now!! Not ever!!
My day after Thanksgiving message | 11/26/200 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 11/26/2009 9:55:25 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Apparently there are still some posters on FR who are fast asleep. Wake up! Dammit! We are in the middle of a conservative rebellion! While you were sleeping we, along with millions of other freedom loving grassroots Americans have participated in hundreds of tea parties all across this great land and fully intend to keep it up until all of America is awake. We are fed up and mad as hell! We grassroots Americans are delivering a message to the ruling class: NO MORE!!

No more big government! No more high taxes! No more government bailouts! No more government takeovers! No government healthcare! No more corruption! No more global baloneyism!!

We're sick and tired of liberals and RINOs running roughshod over our God given Liberty!

We want our country back! We want our freedom back! We want it all back!!

No more socialism!!

Cut the taxes! Cut the spending! Cut the government!

Restore the constitutional limits on government! Restore our freedom!!

And not only no, but HELL NO to liberals and RINOS!!

Free Republic will not support RINOS!! Rudy McRomney, et al, can go straight to hell!!

The strategy is we win, they lose.

Any questions?


TOPICS: Breaking News; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bds; bdserspinged; bdsisawesome; bugzapper; byecedric; caocrap; carlyfiorino; cedricisgone; cedricisromney; cedriclovesrinos; congress; corporatemarketeers; destroyallrinos; ebaybillionairess; firethemall; gomerhuckleberry; gopimplosion; grahamnesty; grannyiswacky; herewegowithbds; huckaphoney; jimrob; jimrobkicksbutt; jimrobrant; jimthompson; juanmccain; letthepurgebegin; marchondc; mclame; mcqueeg; mcshame; mcwuss; meghanyoulongtime; megsbillions; megwhitmansmoney; mittsmillions; mugwhores4mccain; mugwhores4romney; mythromney; newtgrinch; nomorerinos; norinos; noromneybots; notocharliecrist; olympiasnowejob; onlinemarketing; onlineroleplaying; onlinerpg; paid2post; paidposters; paidposters4rinos; paidtopost; pawlentyoftrouble; purgeallrinos; purgeromneybots; purgethemccainiacs; purgetherinobots; rino; rinoalert; rinoparty; rinopartyfail; rinopurge; rinos; rinos4obama; rinosluvmeghan; romneybots; rudybots; scuzzyfavabeans; sweartocrist; teaparties; teapartyrebellion; time2partyagain; whitman4romney; whitmansbillions; yyyscratchingparts; zotorama; zottherinotrolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,361-1,3801,381-1,4001,401-1,420 ... 2,501-2,502 next last
To: Melas
Jindal--No gravitas
Huckabee--Belongs in a hillbilly band
Romney--NO!
Gingrich--NO!
Pawlenty--Maybe
Petraeus--Possibly
Palin--YES!
1,381 posted on 11/27/2009 9:54:03 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1273 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Lord Acton supported the Confederacy precisely because he loved the federalist form of government and states’ rights (perhaps too fulsomely, as his love for those goods which were lost in the War Between the States seems to have made him overlook the evil of slavery which was abolished with them).

The winners write history: states’ rights were the issue in the Late Unpleasantness, but to cover up the fact that the wrong side of that issue won, the winners have portrayed the war as having been about slavery.


1,382 posted on 11/27/2009 10:06:16 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 724 | View Replies]

To: broncobilly

buh bye, troll.


1,383 posted on 11/27/2009 10:10:31 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Join the TEA Party Rebellion!! God save this great Republic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1380 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
>>>>The "War Between the States"... "the Late Unpleasantness"

LMAO Its known in history as the American Civil War. I guess you believe Lincoln was a murdering tyrant too. Another Dixiecrat-Slavocrat libertarian, or would that be paleoconservative? Whatever. So who is your favortite Lincoln basher? My guess is, Thomas DiLorenzo.

1,384 posted on 11/27/2009 10:27:59 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1382 | View Replies]

To: DB

No more “compassionate conservatism” either. It was an underhanded attack on conservatism. The left’s government people mills is the antitheses of compassion and always has been.


Agreed. The Bush family undid the grassroots conservatives’ work from Goldwater to Reagan.


1,385 posted on 11/27/2009 10:37:50 PM PST by Psalm 144 (What did you think NEW WORLD ORDER meant? The Constitution? States' rights? Individual liberty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I missed this yesterday - now I have to read the whole thread.

YES!!!


1,386 posted on 11/27/2009 10:38:17 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball
you have expressed contempt for, among others, Antonin Scalia, Sarah Palin, JD Hayworth, Tom Tancredo and Alan Keys

I have not mentioned Scalia ever that I can remember. And I am dissing the Hari Palins, not Palin herself. I think Palin is ok, it is her supporters that go around spamming every thread, banging drums and singing Hari Hari Palin.

I think Alan Keyes and Tancredo were jokes as presidential candidates as evidenced by their vote totals. Ditto for Chris Simcox in his current senate run.

1,387 posted on 11/27/2009 10:42:32 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1369 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

LMAO !

Looks like ya had the best turkey recipe.


1,388 posted on 11/27/2009 10:44:32 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1331 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

The GOP Establishment was able to bring the party together to opposed the Obama stimulus as a means of appeasing us and making us think they are all conservative.

Its happening now with the “healthcare” issue.

They hope to use the emotions we feel against it to make us think they are good because they oppose it.

On other issues, the Republicans play games.

Ten GOP Senators like Lamar Alexander voted on procedure to move a leftist judicial nominee to a final vote the other week.

Then there were 39 votes against the leftie in the final vote with Republicans looking like they opposed the Obama nominee while ten of them voted the other way in a procedural vote before the final one.

Heck, my own Republican congressman voted for some Jack Murtha defense pork (earmarks) so he could get some for his own district on the side.

The GOP insiders have a tradition of creating the “wedge” emotional issues to get our votes, then they go down and give us Medicare Part D and try to support amnesty for illegals.


1,389 posted on 11/27/2009 11:03:02 PM PST by Nextrush (Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Better than that. There are other threads that relate to this one. Don’t skip them. And make sure you click on every link you come across. If any images don’t show up, try opening them in a different window. You don’t want to miss a thing. Put the coffee on. ; )


1,390 posted on 11/27/2009 11:04:07 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1386 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I adopted my strategy from Ronald Reagan. We win, they lose. If it was good enough for him, it’s good enough for me.

How about the words of Reagan posted right here at FR:

"When I began entering into the give and take of legislative bargaining in Sacramento, a lot of the most radical conservatives who had supported me during the election didn't like it.

"Compromise" was a dirty word to them and they wouldn't face the fact that we couldn't get all of what we wanted today. They wanted all or nothing and they wanted it all at once. If you don't get it all, some said, don't take anything.

"I'd learned while negotiating union contracts that you seldom got everything you asked for. And I agreed with FDR, who said in 1933: 'I have no expectations of making a hit every time I come to bat. What I seek is the highest possible batting average.'

"If you got seventy-five or eighty percent of what you were asking for, I say, you take it and fight for the rest later, and that's what I told these radical conservatives who never got used to it.

So would you vote for a 75% candidate in the general election, or sit on your hands and hold out for 100%? You want to go by what President Reagan said, then read his position about political compromise.

Any response to these words of wisdom from President Reagan?

1,391 posted on 11/27/2009 11:07:15 PM PST by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1322 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Thank you, BykrBayb! I’ve been ultra busy and computer’s been “funny” for a few days.

Any links you send me about these related threads you speak of will be greatly appreciated!

(This seems sort of like the bugzapper thread!!!)

I hope you had a happy Thanksgiving -


1,392 posted on 11/27/2009 11:10:36 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1390 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

There can be no compromise with constitution trampling big government socialist abortion pushers. They are the enemy within.

If you wish to promote RINOs you’ll have to do it somewhere other than FR.


1,393 posted on 11/27/2009 11:12:09 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Join the TEA Party Rebellion!! God save this great Republic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1391 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Then the only successful strategy is to try to educate the voters in those two districts to the supremecy of conservative ideology.

Your posts are excellent... People need to learn that conversion of liberals to conservatives is a process, much like evangelism. You convert people not by beating them over the head, or saying "put up or shut up" or "go away because you aren't 100% exactly as I demand", but by challenging them about their positions, bringing them about one at a time, and living with them.

If we want to shrink the GOP, we can. Of course, we'll end up with a 35% Democrat, 17% GOP, and 17% conservative party break-out, and that will guarantee a virtual lock for Democrats forever.

No, the GOP needs to be brought around to better reflect the conservative position, which means it must be won in the battle of ideas, internal to the GOP. And its message of conservatism needs to be open and freely expressed, not a "this way or the highway". I'll welcome anyone to come and discuss my positions or my faith, and I will welcome them to walk along with me, even if they do not fully believe as I do. Because the more time I can spend with them, the stronger my case becomes.

Ideological purists are the surest way to kill any hope for a non-Democrat rule.

1,394 posted on 11/27/2009 11:14:10 PM PST by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1341 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

You didn’t address the above to me, but since I just read it, I’d say this:

I’m sick of dealing with Republicans who at the most are trying to win maybe a 10% conservative agenda. If that. Really just Democrap Lite. Most of their message, votes and so on is like Democrat puke. The old saying that Dems want to take us to hell fast, and most Republicans will take us there slower, is really accurate.

Me, I want to go in the opposite direction altogether.


1,395 posted on 11/27/2009 11:14:48 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1391 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya
I'm not trying to be difficult but getting a conservative past the primary isn't usually possible and we are left with bad cholces

If you start by planning what you will do after you lose, you will lose.

1,396 posted on 11/27/2009 11:15:37 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (a wild-eyed, exclusionist, birther religio-beast -- Daily Kos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1257 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
That's not true. I voted both for Tom McClintock (running against Arnold) and for Duncan Hunter for Pres. I didn't plan on losing.

Lofty platitudes just don't provide a solution.

1,397 posted on 11/27/2009 11:18:44 PM PST by CAluvdubya (Palin 2012...YOU BETCHA!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1396 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

The fear of Obama is not going to convince me to support anything with an R next to it.

“Republican solidarity” this year is about getting re-elected next year and has nothing to do with authentic conversion to a conservative position.

It really is about less government, lower taxes and more freedom.

They are non-negotiable at this point.

I still remember Rush Limbaugh debating a guy who then worked for George W Bush at the White House and now works for RNC.

Ed Gillespie was challenged about eliminating federal agencies like the Department of Education.

Ed Gillespie said “That’s not going to happen.”

Well, Republicans, it had better start happening for real because enough is enough.

The GOP in the House pushed a 3.1 trillion dollar budget plan this year as opposed to the Democrats 3.5 trillion dollar one.

The real “solidarity” of Republicans in Washington seems to be for big spending government as usual.


1,398 posted on 11/27/2009 11:18:51 PM PST by Nextrush (Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

This reminds me of the Bugzapper Thread too. All the nastiest trolls were zotted on that thread. I stayed up all night watching one of them slowly roasting over JR’s flame. It was kind of like a pig roast.

I spent Thanksgiving with family, so it was good.

How was your Thanksgiving?


1,399 posted on 11/27/2009 11:20:02 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1392 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

John McCain was spouting the “climate change” mantra before he realized we don’t like it and that he needs to get re-elected next year.

McCain spoke “Green” in many places including the Convervative Party conference in the UK.


1,400 posted on 11/27/2009 11:25:09 PM PST by Nextrush (Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,361-1,3801,381-1,4001,401-1,420 ... 2,501-2,502 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson