Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Economy Is Forcing Young Adults Back Home in Big Numbers, Survey Finds
New York Times ^ | November 24, 2009 | Sam Roberts

Posted on 11/24/2009 5:18:38 AM PST by reaganaut1

For more young adults, there is no place like home for the holidays, and for the rest of the year, too. Ten percent of adults younger than 35 told the Pew Research Center that they had moved back in with their parents because of the recession.

They also blamed the economy for other lifestyle decisions. Twelve percent had gotten a roommate to share expenses. Fifteen percent said they had postponed getting married, and 14 percent said they had delayed having a baby.

In the Pew study, 13 percent of parents with grown children said one of their adult sons or daughters had moved back home in the past year. According to Pew, of all grown children who lived with their parents, 2 in 10 were full-time students, one-quarter were unemployed and about one-third said they had lived on their own before returning home.

According to the census, 56 percent of men 18 to 24 years old and 48 percent of women were either still under the same roof as their parents or had moved back home.

A smaller share of 16-to-24-year-olds — 46 percent — is currently employed than at any time since the government began collecting that data in 1948.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: jobs; liberalismalert; livingwithparents; youngadults
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
The Obama economy. Raising the minimum wage, mandating health insurance, and other measures that make hiring more expensive cause more young people to be unemployed or underemployed. The WSJ reports that Suicides are Rising.
1 posted on 11/24/2009 5:18:39 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

My guess is that they won’t come out in droves to vote Obama again!


2 posted on 11/24/2009 5:20:21 AM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

They’ll be offset by the ever-growing, ever-loyal voting bloc of Deceased-Americans.


3 posted on 11/24/2009 5:22:00 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Some are coming back only to find out that their parents sold the house and are now on a world cruise.


4 posted on 11/24/2009 5:22:33 AM PST by shadeaud ("If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten." -- George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud

Serves them right.


5 posted on 11/24/2009 5:24:24 AM PST by Cheryllynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

>> The WSJ reports that Suicides are Rising.

Now there’s a trend that I wish would catch on in Congress and the Bambi-ministration.


6 posted on 11/24/2009 5:26:14 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

For every one that moves back home or otherwise moves in with someone else, that’s one more housing unit (apartment, rented house, or formerly-owned house) now unoccupied.

Keep that in mind whenever you hear claims of “Housing recovery just around the corner!!!!!”.


7 posted on 11/24/2009 5:26:55 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud

Or have sold the house and downsized so much there is no extra room.... don’t tell our kids, but that’s what we’re gonna do ;O)... j/k

And on THAT note, picked up our Airman yesterday from the airport (the one who’s been in Iraq) - oh it is so good to see him!!!! Has to go back to Jersey on Friday, but that’s ok, we have him for the week (yep, happy Mom moment)


8 posted on 11/24/2009 5:27:25 AM PST by Grumpybutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud

I think that this is their generations “Carter Moment”. I remember everyone on my high school was extremely pro Carter, he got a huge percentage of the youth vote. Shortly after we also learned about how important is was to really find out about your candidate before jumping on any bandwagon. That descision haunts me to this day...that is why I didn’t vote Obama.


9 posted on 11/24/2009 5:32:14 AM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

Excellent! I know you will be giving lots of “thanks” for that!


10 posted on 11/24/2009 5:35:51 AM PST by mom4melody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

My younger sister is living with our parents. She has a job using her journalism degree but apparently it doesn’t pay so her choices are a slum apartment, or my parents’ house. They’d rather she live with them. But they aren’t empty nesters by a long stretch, still got half a dozen younger kids in the house.

Me, I got out after college and am glad I didn’t have to move back but I’m also glad my sister has the option.


11 posted on 11/24/2009 5:39:09 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JenB

According to the census, 56 percent of men 18 to 24 years old and 48 percent of women were either still under the same roof as their parents or had moved back home.

A smaller share of 16-to-24-year-olds — 46 percent — is currently employed than at any time since the government began collecting that data in 1948.

I hope that someone explains to them that this is what they voted for.


12 posted on 11/24/2009 5:54:42 AM PST by Cyclone59 (I ROCK, Guitar Hero said so........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

It used to be the norm having several generations in one household. We’re moving backwards.


13 posted on 11/24/2009 6:04:47 AM PST by randita (Chains you can bereave in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud
Some are coming back only to find out that their parents sold the house and are now on a world cruise.

And some met their parents on the road who asked if they could come live with their kids because their 401k's and home equity were destroyed and they can't afford to retire.

14 posted on 11/24/2009 6:06:33 AM PST by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't fly, can't ski, can't drive, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg
I think you're right. I was an enthusiastic Carter voter in 1976. That was the last time I ever voted Democrat.
15 posted on 11/24/2009 6:09:07 AM PST by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59

Well I know for a fact that my sister didn’t vote for him! She may be in that statistic but she isn’t stupid.


16 posted on 11/24/2009 6:09:23 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Excuses excuses. Young adults are moving back home because they don’t have the guts to face challenges independently.


17 posted on 11/24/2009 6:10:52 AM PST by Huck (The Constitution--a big government boondoggle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud
Some are coming back only to find out that their parents sold the house and are now on a world cruise.

I have all three adult kids back living at my house, including a grandson. I also have an aged father-in-law living with me. He's been living in my house since 1986.

I don't know what the point of the article was, but that's what families do. They help out when help is needed so they don't end up on welfare, in government housing, living off food stamps and (un)earned income credits, while receiving government sponsored child care and free post-high school education/training.

18 posted on 11/24/2009 6:11:06 AM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: randita
It used to be the norm having several generations in one household. We’re moving backwards.

No, we're going back to sensible life styles, where the kids work their adult jobs for a number of years while saving money by living at home. That way, they'll have a 20% downpayment for the house they want to buy so they aren't enticed to do a no money down paperless sub-prime mortgage. That doesn't sound backwards, that sounds like progress to me.

19 posted on 11/24/2009 6:15:43 AM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: randita

The big difference is that back then, the oldest people in the house didn’t have the highest standard of living at the expense of the younger workers.


20 posted on 11/24/2009 6:32:31 AM PST by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson