To: maggief
Excellent talking point. I used to call it a hoax, but I now call it a fraud. Different connotation, with facts to back it up. We need to put a nail in this coffin.
4 posted on
11/21/2009 6:33:47 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
To: ClearCase_guy
>> I now call it a fraud.
Another point: hoaxes don’t have a profit motive, whereas frauds usually involve $$$$$MONEY$$$$$.
That’s what Global Warmism is all about... MONEY fraud of breathtaking proportion never before seen in the history of mankind.
6 posted on
11/21/2009 6:36:47 AM PST by
Nervous Tick
(Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
To: ClearCase_guy
Since the info was gotten illegally, I guess these crooks can’t be prosecuted? Boy wouldn’t that be sweet, the courtroom circus and all. The DBM couldn’t avoid covering it.
7 posted on
11/21/2009 6:38:49 AM PST by
DAC21
To: ClearCase_guy
To slightly misquote Dan Rather, “Fake but Real”.
11 posted on
11/21/2009 6:43:06 AM PST by
muawiyah
(Git Out The Way)
To: ClearCase_guy
I used to call it a hoax, but I now call it a fraud.
True.
It was designed to suck funds from governments, via taxes, into self-interested concerns.
To quote Judge Judy: "Follow the money."
Who got and are getting rich off of this fraud?
The trouble is, who can investigate? Major world governments can't, because they voted for the various funding bills. Look at how many of our own politicians have been 'sold' on this fraud just during the last decade.
Massive amounts of $money have exchanged hands. And government entities have been the brokers.
How many $billions has this fraud cost taxpayers throughout the world?
25 posted on
11/21/2009 6:54:07 AM PST by
TomGuy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson