That's why Holder was such a babbling idiot at the Senate hearing yesterday. He had no clue about any of the legal arguments, rationale, etc. for this move -- though I'm sure he was 100% behind it.
Can the WH remove jurisdiction from the military court? I thought Congress decided this, didn’t they? And since they’re the lawmakers...but I could certainly be wrong.
Inasmuch as he would be in favor of it for the “kickback” money he will get from his “former” law firm who is defending the terrorists. Now,in addition to this fact one could ask—who is paying for KSM’s defense? Might it be the Saudis or Obozos benefactor/rep for the Saudis. This information should be “transparent” to all concerned. So let’s try to find out, now, and get that out there too. It sure ain’t the public defender or pro bono work. How about the Yemeni Honey Co— aka al Qaeda. Or intermediaries handling the ransom money for the Somali ship hijackers?
Holder was indeed a ‘babbling idiot’. Truthfully, how can he be the USAG? I would have expected some sort of references to case law when Lindsay Graham was questioning him.
Lame. Just like his fearless leader, O’Zero.